Efficacy of Lung and Inferior Vena Cava Sonography for Fluid Optimization

NCT ID: NCT05400343

Last Updated: 2022-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-15

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in trauma patients. As the primary injury cannot be reversed, management strategies must focus on preventing secondary injury by avoiding hypotension and hypoxia and maintaining appropriate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which is a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF). The goal should be euvolemia and avoidance of hypotension. The assessment of a patient's body fluid status is a challenging task for modern clinicians.

The use of Ultrasonography to assess body fluids has numerous advantages. The concept of using lung ultrasound for monitoring the patient is one of the major innovations that emerged from recent studies. Pulmonary congestion may be semiquantified using lung ultrasound and deciding how the patient tolerates fluid. Inferior vena cava (IVC) sonography and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become widely used as a tool to help clinicians prescribe fluid therapy. Common POCUS applications that serve as guides to fluid administration rely on assessments of the inferior vena cava to estimate preload and lung ultrasound to identify the early presence of extravascular lung water and avoid fluid over resuscitation In this study we will use the measurements of both lung and IVC together to guide fluid dosage in critically ill patients with TBI. We will also use ONSD as a mirror for intra-cranial pressure (ICP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to detect the effectiveness of using IVC and lung ultrasound as bedside tools to ensure euvolemia in patients with traumatic brain injuries

Positive fluid balances have been associated with (angiographic) vasospasm, longer hospital length of stay and poor functional outcomes The assessment of a patient's body fluid status is a challenging task for modern clinicians. Currently, the most accurate method to guide fluid administration decisions uses "dynamic" measures that estimate the change in cardiac output that would occur in response to a fluid bolus. Unfortunately, their use remains limited due to required technical expertise, costly equipment, or applicability in only a subset of patients. Alternatively, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become widely used as a tool to help clinicians prescribe fluid therapy.

International recommendations suggest that the inferior vena cava (IVC) can be assessed to estimate the pressure in the right atrium of non-ventilated patients because of its collapsibility during inspiration. An IVC diameter of \< 21mm with collapsibility of \> 50% during inspiration suggests normal right atrium pressure (between 0 and 5 mmHg), whereas a diameter of \> 21mm with collapsibility of \< 50% suggests high pressure (between 10 and 20mmHg). The dynamic method of IVC evaluation, based on the variation in its diameter with respiration, enables the assessment of the potential benefit of fluid administration as a function of IVC compliance.

Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in TBI patients has been shown to correlate with increased ICP and systemic reviews have supported this observation.

In this study, we will use the measurements of both lung and IVC together to guide fluid dosage in critically ill patients with TBI. We will also use ONSD as a mirror for ICP

The study investigates the effect of using bedside sonography in fluid assessment in a critically ill patient

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Single-blind (participant) study

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard care (control group)

fluid therapy will be guided by conventional ICU policies to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard care (control group)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following 24 hours from admission to the ICU, the standard care will be continued according to conventional ICU protocols

The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment.

Standard ICU Care

Intervention Type OTHER

All patients will receive the usual care for 24 hours according to ICU policies. The main target is to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output. The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment. Lung sounds, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, urine output, Lactate, haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate values

US-guided fluid management (active group)

Fluid therapy will be guided by measurements of lung and IVC sonography

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

US-guided fluid management (active group)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Within 24 hours from admission to the ICU, IVC and lung sonography will be performed every other day and according to their measurements, the volume of fluid therapy will be adjusted.

Standard ICU Care

Intervention Type OTHER

All patients will receive the usual care for 24 hours according to ICU policies. The main target is to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output. The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment. Lung sounds, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, urine output, Lactate, haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate values

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard care (control group)

Following 24 hours from admission to the ICU, the standard care will be continued according to conventional ICU protocols

The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

US-guided fluid management (active group)

Within 24 hours from admission to the ICU, IVC and lung sonography will be performed every other day and according to their measurements, the volume of fluid therapy will be adjusted.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ICU Care

All patients will receive the usual care for 24 hours according to ICU policies. The main target is to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output. The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment. Lung sounds, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, urine output, Lactate, haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate values

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI less than 35 kg/m2
* Diagnosed with traumatic brain injury
* Glasgow coma score ≥ 4

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to get consent
* Presence of Increased intra-abdominal pressure,
* Presence of acute cor pulmonale
* Presence of severe right ventricular dysfunction.
* Pregnancy
* Patients with known pulmonary conditions that interfere with the interpretation of lung ultrasound like pneumectomy; pulmonary fibrosis; persistent pleural effusion
* Stage 5 chronic kidney disease
* indication for emergency renal replacement therapy (RRT)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mostafa M Saied, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Medhat M Messeha, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistant Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, DK, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mostafa M Saied, MD

Role: CONTACT

00201223495380

Medhat M Messeha, MD

Role: CONTACT

00201207788199

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MFM-IRB, MD ∕ 22.01.591

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.