Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2025-08-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prosthetic Socket Interface Design on Socket Comfort, Residual Limb Health, and Function for the Transfemoral Amputee
NCT02773056
An Investigation Into a New Manufacture Technique of Trans-femoral Sockets
NCT04312724
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Manufactured Prosthetic Sockets
NCT01155024
Prosthetic Smart Socket Technology to Improve Patient Interaction, Usability, Comfort, Fit, and Function.
NCT03199222
Computational Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Optimized Patient-Specific Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets
NCT03544853
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective/Hypothesis: Goal of this research is to improve the current socket design optimization process that involves trial and error and relies heavily on the prosthetist's experience and intuition by using a quantitatively informed optimization process. The hypothesis is that modifiable in-socket mechanics, i.e. residual femur motion, skin strain, and pressure within the socket, are related to socket design and patient outcomes, and can be estimated using readily available clinical measurements.
Specific Aims: First aim is to identify the key characteristics of in-socket mechanics that are related to physical function and patient-reported comfort and function. The second aim is to identify readily available clinical measurements that are associated with the in-socket mechanical characteristics that are related to outcomes. The purpose of this aim is to correlate our laboratory findings from Aim 1 with more conventional modalities for clinical assessment.
Research Strategy: Preliminary data demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed research plan and will progress to a pilot clinical trial. The two aims will involve 30 transfemoral amputees. A highspeed biplane radiography system is used to image the residual limb while participants walk on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill both in their current socket and in sockets with purposely altered volume, brim height, cross-sectional geometry, and stiffness. Three-dimensional (3D) skin motion within the socket will be determined by tracking the motion of 40 to 50 small metal beads placed in a grid pattern on the skin of the residual limb before donning the socket. Residual femur motion within the socket will be determined with submillimeter accuracy using a validated tracking process that matches subject-specific bone models obtained from CT to the biplane radiographs. Discrete in-socket pressure will be recorded at four locations using pressure sensing pads. Readily available clinical measurements will be collected as well, including gait analysis, foot loading patterns, ground reaction forces, residual limb tissue stiffness, and hip range of motion hip strength. Each participant will complete clinical questionnaires to qualitatively evaluate comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction after wearing each socket. The different socket modifications are intended to affect the in-socket mechanics of the residual limb, physical function and patient-reported outcomes (Aim 1). These relationships will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Correlation between the research grade measurements and accessible clinical measures (Aim 2) will be evaluated using bivariate correlation analyses. The information gained in Aims 1 and 2 will be used to develop a quantitatively-informed socket optimization process, wherein the clinical measurements associated with in-socket mechanics will be used to inform socket design optimizations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random Order
The sequence of the 9 different interventions (original socket and 8 versions derived from it) is randomized for each participant. The number of participants is smaller than the number of possible permutations. Therefore the enacted ordering is randomly selected from the pool of possible orderings. Participants walk for less than 10 minutes with every socket type while data is being collected.
Trans-femoral prosthetic socket
Unmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis
1. Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original)
2. Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original)
3. moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
4. slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
5. Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original)
6. Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original)
7. CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM))
8. MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Trans-femoral prosthetic socket
Unmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis
1. Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original)
2. Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original)
3. moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
4. slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
5. Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original)
6. Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original)
7. CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM))
8. MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18-80 years of age
* Body weight less than 125 kg
* Able to walk unassisted on a treadmill
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically diagnosed osteoporosis
* Previous high exposure to radiation
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
William Anderst
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William Anderst, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Delatorre Orthotics & Prosthetics
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Anderst W, Fiedler G, Onishi K, McKernan G, Gale T, Paulus P. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06205-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W81XWH2010914
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STUDY20070123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.