Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process

NCT ID: NCT05041998

Last Updated: 2025-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will investigate the effects of specific standardized modifications to trans-femoral prosthetic sockets in a randomized within-subject design. This is in preparation for a subsequently planned clinical trial to validate the findings by implementing them into a fitting method for individual sockets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Lower limb amputees experience chronic health challenges such as residual limb skin problems, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. These problems are exacerbated by high physical activity levels and by poor prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetists believe that limiting residual femur and skin motion will improve force coupling and thereby address these problems. However, there are no data demonstrating how changes in socket design affect residual femur and skin motion, and, by extension, lead to improved patient-reported outcomes.

Objective/Hypothesis: Goal of this research is to improve the current socket design optimization process that involves trial and error and relies heavily on the prosthetist's experience and intuition by using a quantitatively informed optimization process. The hypothesis is that modifiable in-socket mechanics, i.e. residual femur motion, skin strain, and pressure within the socket, are related to socket design and patient outcomes, and can be estimated using readily available clinical measurements.

Specific Aims: First aim is to identify the key characteristics of in-socket mechanics that are related to physical function and patient-reported comfort and function. The second aim is to identify readily available clinical measurements that are associated with the in-socket mechanical characteristics that are related to outcomes. The purpose of this aim is to correlate our laboratory findings from Aim 1 with more conventional modalities for clinical assessment.

Research Strategy: Preliminary data demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed research plan and will progress to a pilot clinical trial. The two aims will involve 30 transfemoral amputees. A highspeed biplane radiography system is used to image the residual limb while participants walk on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill both in their current socket and in sockets with purposely altered volume, brim height, cross-sectional geometry, and stiffness. Three-dimensional (3D) skin motion within the socket will be determined by tracking the motion of 40 to 50 small metal beads placed in a grid pattern on the skin of the residual limb before donning the socket. Residual femur motion within the socket will be determined with submillimeter accuracy using a validated tracking process that matches subject-specific bone models obtained from CT to the biplane radiographs. Discrete in-socket pressure will be recorded at four locations using pressure sensing pads. Readily available clinical measurements will be collected as well, including gait analysis, foot loading patterns, ground reaction forces, residual limb tissue stiffness, and hip range of motion hip strength. Each participant will complete clinical questionnaires to qualitatively evaluate comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction after wearing each socket. The different socket modifications are intended to affect the in-socket mechanics of the residual limb, physical function and patient-reported outcomes (Aim 1). These relationships will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Correlation between the research grade measurements and accessible clinical measures (Aim 2) will be evaluated using bivariate correlation analyses. The information gained in Aims 1 and 2 will be used to develop a quantitatively-informed socket optimization process, wherein the clinical measurements associated with in-socket mechanics will be used to inform socket design optimizations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Artificial Limbs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Participants will perform study activities with nine different versions (including the original unmodified) of their prosthetic socket in a randomized sequence.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

The Research Technician and Engineer will be blinded to the socket modification when processing radiographic data from each trial. The participant will not be told the modification made to each socket, however the nature of the intervention (body worn prosthetic device) makes masking infeasible.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random Order

The sequence of the 9 different interventions (original socket and 8 versions derived from it) is randomized for each participant. The number of participants is smaller than the number of possible permutations. Therefore the enacted ordering is randomly selected from the pool of possible orderings. Participants walk for less than 10 minutes with every socket type while data is being collected.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trans-femoral prosthetic socket

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis

1. Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original)
2. Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original)
3. moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
4. slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
5. Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original)
6. Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original)
7. CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM))
8. MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trans-femoral prosthetic socket

Unmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis

1. Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original)
2. Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original)
3. moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
4. slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
5. Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original)
6. Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original)
7. CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM))
8. MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Transfemoral prosthesis user
* 18-80 years of age
* Body weight less than 125 kg
* Able to walk unassisted on a treadmill

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant females
* Clinically diagnosed osteoporosis
* Previous high exposure to radiation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Defense

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

William Anderst

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William Anderst, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Delatorre Orthotics & Prosthetics

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anderst W, Fiedler G, Onishi K, McKernan G, Gale T, Paulus P. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06205-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35413866 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH2010914

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STUDY20070123

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transfemoral Powered Foot and Physical Therapy Study
NCT03625921 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA