A Test-Drive Strategy for the Prescription of Prosthetic Feet for People With Leg Amputations

NCT ID: NCT03651830

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-24

Study Completion Date

2022-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective/Hypotheses and Specific Aims: The primary aim of this proposal is to determine whether a PFE can be used to predict foot preference and mobility outcomes with corresponding commercial prosthetic feet in people with a unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA). Secondarily, the investigators aim to determine whether a brief trial of commercial prosthetic feet would be able to similarly predict longer-term foot preference and mobility outcomes with those feet.

Study Design: The investigators will use a participant blinded cross-over study with repeated measurements. Participants with TTA will be enrolled at each of the three study sites: two VA sites (Puget Sound and Minneapolis), and one Department of Defense site (Center for the Intrepid). Participants will complete up to 6 visits. After an initial assessment visit, participants will be assigned to the high or low mobility group, and then during visit 2 they will be randomized to use the PFE in three foot modes or the three corresponding actual (commercially available) feet during walking tests in the laboratory. During visit 3 participants will repeat the procedures in the other condition (e.g., PFE if Day 2 included actual feet testing). At the end of visit 3 participants will be fit with one of the actual feet and wear it at home and in the community for approximately two weeks. At visit 4 participants will be fit with the next actual foot and repeat the 2 week use window. The same process will be followed for the final foot at visit 5, and the study foot will be returned at visit 6. Participants' preference, satisfaction and perceived mobility, and functional mobility will be measured and compared across all foot conditions (emulated and actual). After participants complete the procedures detailed above, they may be eligible to be invited to participate in follow-up phone interviews. A subset of participants may also be invited to participate in follow-up biomechanical data collection comparing the PFE foot conditions to the respective actual prosthetic feet during walking. Additionally, a subset of participants may also be invited to participate in follow-up data collection comparing prosthetic foot conditions of different stiffness categories.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives and Rationale: Using a prosthesis allows many who experience lower leg amputation to regain functional abilities, but walking may be more difficult, and a sub-optimal prosthesis can substantially restrict participation in desired activities. Selecting an optimal prosthetic foot is an important aspect of maximizing mobility and the achievement of functional goals for people with lower leg amputation, however there is limited evidence to guide this process. The current prosthetic prescription process relies on clinician experience and typically does not allow people with a leg amputation to easily try out different prosthetic feet. The investigators have developed a customizable robotic prosthetic foot that mimics the mechanical properties of commercially available prosthetic feet without physically changing feet. This 'prosthetic foot emulator' (PFE) can be attached to the prescribed prosthetic socket and worn like a regular prosthetic foot within the laboratory or clinic, providing people with leg amputations the opportunity to quickly 'test-drive' many prosthetic foot designs within a single test session. Trial and error with actual commercial prosthetic feet can be inefficient given the time and expense required for the purchasing and fitting of prosthetic feet. The PFE could provide a means to explore a range of feet in a very short period of time. This study will evaluate the ability of the emulator to accurately reproduce the experience of wearing several commercially available (actual) prosthetic feet. The investigators will test whether brief in-laboratory experiences with emulated or actual feet can accurately predict longer-term foot preference, satisfaction, and walking ability in the community. The investigators will also evaluate the experiences of prosthetic foot prescription practices using qualitative methods from follow-up phone interviews with participants. Finally, the investigators will evaluate biomechanical outcomes during walking between the PFE and actual prosthetic feet to examine the ability of the emulator to accurately reproduce the experience of walking with the actual feet. Results from this study may provide evidence to support a new approach to prosthesis prescription and could resolve longstanding uncertainty in the prescription process for prosthetic feet.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prosthetic Foot Emulator

The Prosthetic Foot Emulator (PFE) is a customizable robotic prosthetic foot that can mimic commercial feet to predict how individual patients will respond to candidate feet. Participants will walk with the PFE using three different modes (emulating three commercial feet) under different walking conditions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prosthetic Foot Emulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will walk in the laboratory with the Prosthetic Foot Emulator (PFE) in three foot modes corresponding to actual study feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected speed, slow speed, fast speed, incline, and up stairs.

Commercially available prosthetic feet

Participants will walk under different walking conditions using three different commercial prosthetic feet.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Commercially available prosthetic feet

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will walk in the laboratory with three different commercially available prosthetic feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected speed, slow speed, fast speed, incline, and up stairs.

Additionally, participants will be fit with one of the actual feet and wear it at home and in the community for approximately two weeks. This will be followed by two-week periods in the community with each of the other two commercially available prosthetic feet.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prosthetic Foot Emulator

Participants will walk in the laboratory with the Prosthetic Foot Emulator (PFE) in three foot modes corresponding to actual study feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected speed, slow speed, fast speed, incline, and up stairs.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Commercially available prosthetic feet

Participants will walk in the laboratory with three different commercially available prosthetic feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected speed, slow speed, fast speed, incline, and up stairs.

Additionally, participants will be fit with one of the actual feet and wear it at home and in the community for approximately two weeks. This will be followed by two-week periods in the community with each of the other two commercially available prosthetic feet.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* has a unilateral (one leg) transtibial (below-knee) amputation
* has used a prosthetic limb for walking for at least six months
* has a comfortably fitting prosthetic socket
* be able to walk with a prosthetic limb sufficiently to participate in the experiment walking trials
* be age 18 to 89 years

Exclusion Criteria

* contralateral limb or upper limb amputation
* are unable to use test feet for any reason (e.g., excessively long residual limb that is not compatible with wearing study prosthetic feet)
* unable to walk under the minimal necessary study walking conditions in order to complete the study procedures without undo stress
* currently pregnant (determined via self-report during screening)
* current surgical, neurological, rheumatologic, or lower limb musculoskeletal problem that significantly impairs ambulation (e.g., current ulcer, terminal illness, lower extremity joint replacement)
* weight greater than 250lbs.
* inadequate cognitive or language function to consent to participate
* currently incarcerated
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Puget Sound Health Care System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brooke Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Morgenroth, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Puget Sound Health Care System and SIBCR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Center for the Intrepid

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

VA Puget Sound Health Care System

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH-16-1-056

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MD13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Criteria for Advanced Prosthetic Foot Prescription
NCT03505983 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Impact of Improving Footwear Options
NCT05601869 RECRUITING NA