An Investigation Into a New Manufacture Technique of Trans-femoral Sockets

NCT ID: NCT04312724

Last Updated: 2020-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-30

Study Completion Date

2020-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigation will be of a single group prospective pre/post design with follow up at 6 weeks (6WFU) and 6 months (6MFU); comparing to outcomes at baseline (BL).

Device(s) being tested: Interchangeably: Direct Socket TF; DS-TF; DS Trans-femoral.

The DS-TF is a trans-femoral (TF) set-up of the currently marketed trans-tibial version. It is not marketed in the USA and has not been registered with the FDA.

The comparator is the current socket the subject is using when enrolled in the study.

Subjects recruited: Minimum 50

Inclusion criteria:

50Kg\< body weight \< 160Kg Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study; Patients who have undergone a transfemoral amputation \> 1 year post amputation Older than 18 years Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol Circular dimension of 40-65 cm at the crotch Residual limb length at least 20 cm from ischium to distal end Currently using a prosthetic liner Locking users that can successfully be fitted with Iceross® Transfemoral Locking, OR Seal-In users that can successfully be fitted with either Iceross Seal-In® X5 TF or Iceross Transfemoral Seal-In®

Exclusion criteria: 50Kg\> body weight \> 160Kg Users with cognitive impairment Patients who have undergone a transfemoral amputation \<1 year post amputation Younger than 18 years Not a prosthetic ambulator, uses only the prosthesis for cosmetic reasons Circular dimension of less than 40 cm or greater than 65 cm at the crotch Residual limb length less than 20 cm from ischium to distal end Currently not using a prosthetic liner

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The test will be a single group prospective pre/post design. Amputees are a small proportion of the general population. The population group specified in the inclusion/exclusion criteria is a further subsample of amputees. For practical reasons, i.e. to achieve statistical power, it is therefore more feasible to use within-subject comparison rather than creating study arms to compare. Furthermore, as mobile amputees generally have and use a prosthetic device for their daily activities, within-comparison is feasible comparing to the subjects' previous device.

All investigational activities will be conducted at prosthetic out-patient clinics.

As stated above the primary endpoint is successful use rate, see Table 2, and the secondary endpoints are listed in the table from B-H in that respective order of significance. See previous chapter on objectives and hypothesis and Table 2 for rationale.

Drop-outs and withdrawals will not be replaced.

Equipment required for each subject:

* Pen/pencil
* Printed out instruments
* Investigational device: Materials for making DS-TF socket o Designated locking or seal-in liner to be fitted with the socket

Additionally, each LPI or LCI will have access to:

* Equipment for DS-TF socket manufacturing
* iPad with the Össur ProApp installed for data collection The equipment used does not require specific monitoring, maintenance or calibration procedures.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate in a cohort the time it takes to manufacture and delivery (lead time) of a definitive prosthesis (definition of finished prosthetic leg is, a prosthesis that is individually tailored and able to be used both indoors and outdoors, with the maximum weight on the patient equivalent to 160 kg). The existing prosthesis is to be evaluated as well as the new socket. The evaluation of function will take place at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months after deliverance.

The following outcome instruments will be used:

• At all three study evaluation points; initial fitting, 6 wees and 6 months:

* OPUS (LEFS, CSD, CSS) https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/orthotics-prosthetics-users-survey
* ProAMP (to test the current function with prosthesis)
* EQ-5D (for life quality)
* Socket Comfort Score (SCS)
* CLASS - socket fit
* Plus-M
* ABC
* TUG

Cost of fitting, to all parties, will be collected and reported. Whatever the outcome of the study will be, it will be very informative for healthcare systems, both payers and providers, and manufacturer of equipment for amputees.

The total time required to implement the full clinical investigation is expected to be approximately 26 months. Each individual subject is expected to participate in the clinical investigation for a minimum of 6 weeks, up to 6 months. The estimated time needed to include the required number (enrolment period) is 20 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Trans-femoral stump mobility pain usability service socket

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical need

Participants enrolled that require a new socket.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Direct Socket TF

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device is Class I, a low-risk product, and is a further development of a well-established technology. Össur Direct Socket (DS) technology has been on the market since 1996 (ICEX first generation) for the manufacture of leg prosthesis. This prosthetic socket for trans-femoral amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TF) has the same basic functional design as the Direct Socket (MSS) for trans-tibial amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TT) that is available on the market today in addition to the newly added silicon brim.

A prosthetic socket is a non-invasive, non-sterile, single user reusable device, which is used as part of prosthetic system. The aspect of the prosthesis that is in direct physical contact with the amputee is usually not the socket, to which a prosthesis is connected to, but the liner that serves as an interface between the amputee and the rest of the prosthesis. An amputee typically wears a prosthesis and thereby utilizes a socket, for up to 18 hours a day.

No clincal need

Participants enrolled that do not require a new socket

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Direct Socket TF

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device is Class I, a low-risk product, and is a further development of a well-established technology. Össur Direct Socket (DS) technology has been on the market since 1996 (ICEX first generation) for the manufacture of leg prosthesis. This prosthetic socket for trans-femoral amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TF) has the same basic functional design as the Direct Socket (MSS) for trans-tibial amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TT) that is available on the market today in addition to the newly added silicon brim.

A prosthetic socket is a non-invasive, non-sterile, single user reusable device, which is used as part of prosthetic system. The aspect of the prosthesis that is in direct physical contact with the amputee is usually not the socket, to which a prosthesis is connected to, but the liner that serves as an interface between the amputee and the rest of the prosthesis. An amputee typically wears a prosthesis and thereby utilizes a socket, for up to 18 hours a day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct Socket TF

The device is Class I, a low-risk product, and is a further development of a well-established technology. Össur Direct Socket (DS) technology has been on the market since 1996 (ICEX first generation) for the manufacture of leg prosthesis. This prosthetic socket for trans-femoral amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TF) has the same basic functional design as the Direct Socket (MSS) for trans-tibial amputees (referred hereby to as DS-TT) that is available on the market today in addition to the newly added silicon brim.

A prosthetic socket is a non-invasive, non-sterile, single user reusable device, which is used as part of prosthetic system. The aspect of the prosthesis that is in direct physical contact with the amputee is usually not the socket, to which a prosthesis is connected to, but the liner that serves as an interface between the amputee and the rest of the prosthesis. An amputee typically wears a prosthesis and thereby utilizes a socket, for up to 18 hours a day.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DS-TF DS Trans-femoral

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study.
* Patients who have undergone a trans-femoral amputation \> 1 year post amputation.
* Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol.
* Circular dimension of 40-65 cm at the crotch.
* Residual limb length at least 20 cm from ischium to distal end.

Exclusion Criteria

* 50Kg \> body weight \> 160Kg
* Users with cognitive impairment
* Not a prosthetic ambulator, uses only the prosthesis for cosmetic reasons
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Össur Iceland ehf

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Justin Pratt, CPO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Össur Iceland ehf

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabama Artificial Limb Specialists

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Alabama Artificial Limb Specialists

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Alabama Artificial Limb Specialists

Opelika, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Van Der Watt Prosthetics & Orthotics

Greenwood, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Tillges Certified Orthotic Prosthetic Inc

Maplewood, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Sampson's Prosthetics Lab

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Sampson's Prosthetics Lab

Schenectady, New York, United States

Site Status

Eastside Orthotics and Prosthetics

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Union Orthotics & Prosthetics Co

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Union Orthotics & Prosthetics Co

East Rochester, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Union Orthotics & Prosthetics Co

Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Union Orthotics & Prosthetics Co

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Union Orthotics & Prosthetics Co

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Victory Orthotics and Prosthetics Inc.

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Victory Orthotics and Prosthetics Inc.

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Victory Orthotics and Prosthetics Inc.

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Virginia Prosthetics and Orthotics

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIP2017122866

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id