Sensitivity of Motor Assessment in MS - a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT ID: NCT04993274
Last Updated: 2021-08-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-02-20
2022-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of fNIRS-based Neurofeedback Training on Balance and Gait in Parkinson's Disease
NCT05800470
Effects of Kinesthetic Stimuli During XBOX Kinect Training on People With Parkinson's Disease
NCT04717271
Efficacy and Safety of F-18 FPCIT PET in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor Patients
NCT00468078
Wearable Movement Sensors for Assessing Motor Impairments and Dyskinesias in Parkinson Disease
NCT01648803
Identification of Motor Symptoms Related to Parkinson's Disease Using Motion Tracking Sensors at Home
NCT03366558
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study converges with prospective observational studies performed at our center. These studies started in 2011 with the objective to define determinants of progression in neuroimmunological disorders (CIS, MS, NMO).
The variables collected for this study were defined according to the study objective and comprise different markers of motor/mobility function, cognitive and affective function, fatigue and health-related quality of life. The primary outcome is a VPC-based assessment of locomotor function (PASS-MS SMSW-MaxS) as the diagnostic test under study. Secondary outcomes serve to cross-validate progression rates or as benchmarks of clinical progression to determine clinical relevance of change. Further, possible effects of cognitive and affective function on the primary outcome can be explored which is of high relevance for the interpretation of changes in the population of MS.
All assessments are performed at inclusion and after 12and 24 months.
Primary outcome:
PASS-MS kinematic parameters with Short Maximum Speed Walk - Speed (SMSW-MaxS) as primary outcome
Secondary outcomes:
* Clinical Examination
* Other kinematic parameters derived from PASS-MS
* Clinical Rating with EDSS and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) consisting of tests of walking capacity (T25FW), hand dexterity (9HPT), cognitive processing speed (SDMT) and visual acuity (Sloan charts)
* Cognitive testing (BRB-N)
* Patient-reported outcomes on global impression of change, MS-related impairment in walking (MSWS-12), hand function, occurrence of fatigue (FSMC), depressive symptoms (BDI-II) and health-related quality of life by MS-specific questionnaire (HAQUAMS)
A change in T25FW speed of at least 20% was found to be clinically meaningful for MS patients (Hobart 2013). In a previous study the investigators found SMSW average walking speed was slower in MS patients (1.6 ± 0.3 m/sec) than in HC (1.8 ± 0.4 m/sec) (Behrens 2014). Therefore, a similar average walking speed was assumed for the population under study at baseline (1.6 m/sec) and a decrease of 0.3 m/sec (corresponding to approximately 20%) as clinically meaningful. Moreover, based on previous reports, investigators assume a standard deviation in the changes of SMSW-MaxS of 0.4 m/sec (Behrens 2014). This results in an expected effect size of 0.75 for the change in SMSW-MaxS between baseline and 24 months follow-up in those with clinically confirmed disability progression. A sample size of N=16 patients will have a power of 80% to detect an effect size of 0.75 with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and a t-test for dependent samples (nQuery Advisor 7.0).
Sample size estimation considered previous evidence on the proportion of patients who will show clinically confirmed disability progression throughout the observation period based on an EDSS change defined as 1 step increase in EDSS ≤ 5.5 and 0.5 step in EDSS \> 5.5 within 24 months. Cutter et al. (1999) reported that 10% of their patients showed EDSS confirmed sustained change within 3 months and 40% showed a change to baseline in 1 year reported in MSFC, which also incorporates the T25FW. The investigators assume that at least 20 % of patients showing a confirmed sustained change in EDSS according to above definition within 24months to be a realistic scenario.
When considering an overall dropout rate of 10-20% (lost to follow-up), this would result in N=16 complete datasets when overall N=100 patients are included.
Patients should not have had an acute relapse up to 3 months before follow-up visit (12 and 24 months). To avoid dropout due to acute relapse the follow-up visit is extended to up to 3 months in case of acute relapse.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PASS-MS
protocol using short motor tasks performed by the subject and recorded by a depth camera, motion analysis by visuo-perceptive computing
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ability to perform PASS-MS short walking test (max. of 5 m distance) with no or only unilateral assistance (EDSS \<6.5)
* written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Other cause of locomotor or balance dysfunction than MS
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roche Pharma AG
INDUSTRY
Friedemann Paul
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Friedemann Paul
Direktor ECRC, Leiter AG Klinische Neuroimmunologie
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Friedemann Paul
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Studienambulanz Neuroimmunologie am Standort NCRC, Campus Mitte,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EA1/240/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.