Development of Digital Services for Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT06733077
Last Updated: 2025-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-20
2026-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Digital Diagnostic Devices for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06663826
Digital Diagnostics and Intervention Services for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06534177
Digital BIOmarkers for the Assessment of Motor Status in Parkinson's Disease Patients with CLInical and ThErapeutic Application
NCT06817772
Utilizing Smart Devices to Identify New Phenotypical Characteristics in Movement Disorders
NCT03638479
Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
NCT05830253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, PD diagnosis is based on history, clinical assessments, and neurological examination.
The most widely used criteria for diagnosis are the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria and instrument (i.e. The MDS-UPDRS). Further information may be gained from people's subjective description of their symptoms and/or via some short walking tests, such as 3-meter Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed as a snapshot in the clinic. However, people's symptoms vary through and between days and subjective descriptions rely on their memory and observations at home. These recollections can be unreliable or lack enough detail (particularly when the person has cognitive impairment). Therefore, current PD diagnosis criteria are highly dependent on the person and on the diagnosing physician. This subjectivity may lead to a variability in the diagnosis. Furthermore, these clinical assessments are unable to accurately track disease progression over time, making it difficult to provide personalized care. Additionally, manual examinations lack precise measurement instruments, resulting in a low precision of observed measurements and the inability to detect early-stage, subclinical signs. An objective diagnosis based on quantitative data rather than subjective interpretation of clinical findings is important. Therefore, an early and accurate diagnosis of PD, as well as accurate disease progression monitoring, are still important challenges in PD.
Several oculo-visual abnormalities have been described in PD. Studies report an abnormal ocular motor function in 75-87.5% of people with PD. These dysfunctions may precede or follow motor symptoms and thus, the evaluation of ocular motor function may provide valuable information regarding early disease detection or disease progression. The most commonly reported ocular motor dysfunctions are impairments in saccades, smooth pursuit, and vergence.
Gait impairments are among the most common and disabling symptoms of PD. Gait impairments include freezing of gait (FOG), an inability to initiate or maintain normal walking patterns, often resulting in a stochastic stop/start gait, and festinating gait (FSG), which is a shortening of stride length with elevated step frequency, resulting in fast, shuffling steps. Both FOG and FSG contribute to an increased risk of falls (and fall-related injuries) in people with PD relative to the wider elderly population. Objective, and continuous remote gait monitoring would be highly important in people with PD, to objectively track gait impairments in real-time, and potentially contribute to objectively track disease progression, which may lead to personalized care for individuals with PD.
In this project, ocular motor, pupil and gait data in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) will be collected in order to develop machine learning models for the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. With this, the investigators aim to advance the state of the art in PD diagnosis and monitoring. By integrating the principles of machine learning with high-quality sensor data, more accurate and earlier diagnosis could potentially be achieved. Ocular motor and pupil data will be collected with the standard clinical examination and with neos, a medical device approved for objective ocular motor and pupil measurement. Gait will be collected using an IMU sensor and GaitQ senti, a consumer device that allows for an objective and continuous remote gait monitoring.
The primary objective of this project is to collect ocular motor, pupil and gait data from people with PD in order to develop and compare machine learning models for diagnosing and monitoring PD.
Secondary objectives are:
Correlate ocular motor, pupil and gait parameters with several clinical parameters, including the MDS-UPDRS.
Collect real-world evidence (RWE) data regarding health economics parameters to address the individual and combined properties, effects, and/or impacts of the deployed health technologies.
By analysing the data collected, we also aim to contribute to the scientific understanding of PD, potentially uncovering new insights into disease patterns, progression, and response to treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Feasibility of using the MachineMD and gaitQ devices
To complete gaitQ and MachineMD digital feasibility assessment and intervention service development
gait with cueing wearable device and neuro-ocular performance
Participants will be invited to participate in the following sequential phases. Participants can participate in Phases as selected. Control participants will not be invited to Phase 4.
Phase 1. Lab testing \[2 hours\] Validation study of digital technology measures MachineMD and gaitQ to criterion metric of UPDRS.
Phase 2. home/community testing \[2 weeks daily\] Determine feasibility of daily measuring in the home of gaitQ to determine usability, acceptability, and day to day variability of measurement metrics and to determine concurrent validation of home metric to lab metrics to determine, reliability, concurrent validity of change, minimal detectable change and criterion validation to lab-based measures.
Phase 3. Lab retesting \[2 hours\] see Phase 1
Phase 4. Home/community intervention \[2 weeks\] Determine the potential for effect of the gaitQ vibration intervention from a 2-week exposure in the home.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
gait with cueing wearable device and neuro-ocular performance
Participants will be invited to participate in the following sequential phases. Participants can participate in Phases as selected. Control participants will not be invited to Phase 4.
Phase 1. Lab testing \[2 hours\] Validation study of digital technology measures MachineMD and gaitQ to criterion metric of UPDRS.
Phase 2. home/community testing \[2 weeks daily\] Determine feasibility of daily measuring in the home of gaitQ to determine usability, acceptability, and day to day variability of measurement metrics and to determine concurrent validation of home metric to lab metrics to determine, reliability, concurrent validity of change, minimal detectable change and criterion validation to lab-based measures.
Phase 3. Lab retesting \[2 hours\] see Phase 1
Phase 4. Home/community intervention \[2 weeks\] Determine the potential for effect of the gaitQ vibration intervention from a 2-week exposure in the home.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to self-report history of daily gait freezing and/or festination for people with PD or gait and/or transfers affected by condition
* Able to walk unsupported or using an aid for at least 5 minutes and satisfactory completion of the Canadian PARQ and if over 69 used to carrying out this level of exercise
* Adult (+18 years old)
* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (Snellen Visual Acuity \> 12/18) or safe to mobilise with support
* Montreal Cognitive assessment score \>21 or ability to follow 2 stage commands
Healthy participants \[Phase 1,2,3\]
* With no long-term conditions affecting movement
* Able to walk unsupported or using an aid for at least 3 minutes and satisfactory completion of the Canadian PARQ and if over 69 used to carrying out this level of exercise
* Adult (+18 years old)
* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (Snellen Visual Acuity \> 12/18) or safe to mobilise with support
* Montreal Cognitive assessment score \>21 or ability to follow 2 stage commands
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment affecting ability to safely participate and follow instructions
* Any injury or disorder that may affect balance (other than Parkinson's or referring primary condition)
* Any skin conditions or broken skin in the calf and behind knee area
* Deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implants or other implant that may interfere with the measurement system
* Medications likely to affect eye sight or use of virtual reality sytstem
Healthy participants
* Any physical or mental condition affecting ability to safely participate in this level of activity and capacity to understand testing as demonstrated by ability to safely follow commands and pass the PARQ by the research team.
* Cognitive impairment affecting ability to safely participate and follow instructions
* Any injury or disorder that may affect balance (other than Parkinson's or referring primary condition)
* Any skin conditions or broken skin in the calf and behind knee area
* Deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implants or other implants that may interfere with the measurement system
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
University Hospital, Zürich
OTHER
machineMD AG
INDUSTRY
GaitQ company
UNKNOWN
University of Exeter
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helen Dawes, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Exeter
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Exeter
Exeter, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10086932
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2023-24-18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.