Development of Digital Diagnostic Devices for Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT06663826
Last Updated: 2025-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-10-01
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Digital Services for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06733077
Measures of Motor Impairment in Early Parkinson's Disease
NCT00291265
Free-living Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Using Smart Objects
NCT05830253
Neuroplasticity in Parkinson's Disease
NCT05286736
Digital Diagnostics and Intervention Services for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06534177
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, PD diagnosis is based on history, clinical assessments, and neurological examination.
The most widely used criteria for diagnosis are the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria and instrument (i.e. The MDS-UPDRS). Further information may be gained from people's subjective description of their symptoms and/or via some short walking tests, such as 3-meter Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed as a snapshot in the clinic. However, people's symptoms vary through and between days and subjective descriptions rely on their memory and observations at home. These recollections can be unreliable or lack enough detail (particularly when the person has cognitive impairment). Therefore, current PD diagnosis criteria are highly dependent on the person and on the diagnosing physician. This subjectivity may lead to a variability in the diagnosis. Furthermore, these clinical assessments are unable to accurately track disease progression over time, making it difficult to provide personalized care. Additionally, manual examinations lack precise measurement instruments, resulting in a low precision of observed measurements and the inability to detect early-stage, subclinical signs. An objective diagnosis based on quantitative data rather than subjective interpretation of clinical findings is important2. Therefore, an early and accurate diagnosis of PD, as well as accurate disease progression monitoring, are still important challenges in PD.
Several oculo-visual abnormalities have been described in PD. Studies report an abnormal ocular motor function in 75-87.5% of people with PD (3,4). These dysfunctions may precede or follow motor symptoms and thus, the evaluation of ocular motor function may provide valuable information regarding early disease detection or disease progression (5). The most commonly reported ocular motor dysfunctions are impairments in saccades, smooth pursuit, and vergence (3,4,6).
Gait impairments are among the most common and disabling symptoms of PD (29). Gait impairments include freezing of gait (FOG), an inability to initiate or maintain normal walking patterns, often resulting in a stochastic stop/start gait, and festinating gait (FSG), which is a shortening of stride length with elevated step frequency, resulting in fast, shuffling steps. Both FOG and FSG contribute to an increased risk of falls (and fall-related injuries) in people with PD relative to the wider elderly population. Objective, and continuous remote gait monitoring would be highly important in people with PD, to objectively track gait impairments in real-time, and potentially contribute to objectively track disease progression, which may lead to personalized care for individuals with PD.
In this project, ocular motor, pupil and gait data in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) will be collected in order to develop machine learning models for the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. With this, the investigators aim to advance the state of the art in PD diagnosis and monitoring. By integrating the principles of machine learning with high-quality sensor data, more accurate and earlier diagnosis could potentially be achieved. Ocular motor and pupil data will be collected with the standard clinical examination and with neos, a medical device approved for objective ocular motor and pupil measurement. Gait will be collected using an IMU sensor and GaitQ senti, a consumer device that allows for an objective and continuous remote gait monitoring.
The primary objective of this project is to collect ocular motor, pupil and gait data from people with PD in order to develop and compare machine learning models for diagnosing and monitoring PD.
Secondary objectives are:
* Correlate ocular motor, pupil and gait parameters with several clinical parameters, including the MDS-UPDRS.
* Collect real-world evidence (RWE) data regarding health economics parameters to address the individual and combined properties, effects, and/or impacts of the deployed health technologies.
* By analysing the data collected, we also aim to contribute to the scientific understanding of PD, potentially uncovering new insights into disease patterns, progression, and response to treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
people with Parkinson's disease
oculomotor and pupillary function assessment
This is an exploratory open-label single-centre research project intended to collect data of PD patients in order to develop machine learning models for helping in the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. Each patient will have an initial visit and then a second visit after two weeks. The estimated duration of the study visit 1 is 3 hours, not taking into account the time for patient information and informed consent. The estimated duration of the study visit 2 is 2 hours. During these two visits, patients will undergo an MDS-UPDRS assessment, a neos examination, a standard manual ocular motor and pupil function examination, and gait assessment simultaneously with GaitQ senti and an IMU sensor placed on their back. In the two weeks separating the two visits, patient's gait will be monitored daily at home with GaitQ senti, where they will perform a daily TUG test comprising of 15 m walk, 5 sit to stand, and 5-minute walk. Healthy individuals data will be included from a previous study.
Atypical parkinsonism
oculomotor and pupillary function assessment
This is an exploratory open-label single-centre research project intended to collect data of PD patients in order to develop machine learning models for helping in the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. Each patient will have an initial visit and then a second visit after two weeks. The estimated duration of the study visit 1 is 3 hours, not taking into account the time for patient information and informed consent. The estimated duration of the study visit 2 is 2 hours. During these two visits, patients will undergo an MDS-UPDRS assessment, a neos examination, a standard manual ocular motor and pupil function examination, and gait assessment simultaneously with GaitQ senti and an IMU sensor placed on their back. In the two weeks separating the two visits, patient's gait will be monitored daily at home with GaitQ senti, where they will perform a daily TUG test comprising of 15 m walk, 5 sit to stand, and 5-minute walk. Healthy individuals data will be included from a previous study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
oculomotor and pupillary function assessment
This is an exploratory open-label single-centre research project intended to collect data of PD patients in order to develop machine learning models for helping in the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. Each patient will have an initial visit and then a second visit after two weeks. The estimated duration of the study visit 1 is 3 hours, not taking into account the time for patient information and informed consent. The estimated duration of the study visit 2 is 2 hours. During these two visits, patients will undergo an MDS-UPDRS assessment, a neos examination, a standard manual ocular motor and pupil function examination, and gait assessment simultaneously with GaitQ senti and an IMU sensor placed on their back. In the two weeks separating the two visits, patient's gait will be monitored daily at home with GaitQ senti, where they will perform a daily TUG test comprising of 15 m walk, 5 sit to stand, and 5-minute walk. Healthy individuals data will be included from a previous study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Refractive error between -6 and +4 diopters, on both eyes
* Informed consent by participant documented per signature
* Able to self-report history of daily gait freezing and/or festination
* Able to walk unsupported or using an aid for at least 5 minutes and if over 69 used to carrying out this level of exercise
Exclusion Criteria
* Current medication/drugs that could potentially influence performance in ocular motor tasks and/or compliance in the judgement of the investigator (e.g. benzodiazepines, alcohol, stimulants, or recreational drugs) - except Parkinson's medications
* Incapacity to understand and comply with the examination (e.g. due to advanced cognitive decline, failure to comply with easy experimental instructions and tasks)
* Any injury or disorder that may affect eye movement measurements or balance (other than Parkinson's or referring primary condition)
* Any skin conditions or broken skin in the calf and behind the knee area
* Lack of access or limited connectivity to WiFi in home setting
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
University Hospital, Zürich
UNKNOWN
University of Exeter
OTHER
gaitQ Limited
UNKNOWN
machineMD AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Konrad Weber, Prof. Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zurich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
109.813 INT-LS
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HRO-002_BIP-PD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.