Enhanced Recovery After Lumber Laminectomy Using Epidural and General Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT04981158
Last Updated: 2023-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-15
2018-04-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Rectus Sheath Block on Post Operative Quality of Recovery
NCT05244746
Effect of Regional Anesthesia on Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgeries
NCT04586257
Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery
NCT03621345
Retrolaminar Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block as Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Posterior Lumbar Discectomy
NCT06725680
Comparison of the Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spina Plane Block and Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery
NCT05845788
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both groups will be compared as regard:
1. Patient recovery in the form of time to extubation, , time to achieving modified aldrete score ≥ 9 , duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and incidence of PACU bypass.
2. Patients' satisfaction, time to Post anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) for determining home readiness ≥ 9 and incidence of hospital re-admission
3. Intra operative hemodynamic stability, blood loss, operative time and surgeon's satisfaction.
4. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements.
Sample size was calculated using Epi Info 6, based on expected time to modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 in group I 13.1± 3.7 in group GA and in group II 7.9 ± 3.2 , confidence interval 95% and power of test 80%, to be 32. Eight patients will be added to compensate for dropout, so the total number of patients will be 40 patients.
All data will be collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc 13 for windows (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). According to the type of data qualitative data will be represented as number and percentage, parametric quantitative data will be represented by mean ± standard deviation (SD), non-parametric data will be presented as median and range and the following tests were used to test differences for significance and association of qualitative variable by Chi square test (X2). Differences between quantitative multiple by student t-test or Mann Whitney test as appropriate. P value was set at \<0.05 for significant results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group, group I
standard general anesthetic (GA) technique
standard general anesthetic technique, control group, group I
patients will undergo standard general anesthesia with classic endotracheal tube
Epidural /GA using TET group, group II
patients will undergo a single shot epidural bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration) followed by a standard general anesthetic technique in which the trachea was intubated using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET)
(Epidural /GA using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET) group, group II
patients will undergo a single shot epidural bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration) followed by a standard general anesthetic technique in which the trachea was intubated using TET, through its side port 2mg/kg , lidocaine 2% will be sprayed immediately after intubation when the patient is in flat supine position then the same dose of lidocaine will be repeated 10 minutes before anesthetic discontinuation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
(Epidural /GA using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET) group, group II
patients will undergo a single shot epidural bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration) followed by a standard general anesthetic technique in which the trachea was intubated using TET, through its side port 2mg/kg , lidocaine 2% will be sprayed immediately after intubation when the patient is in flat supine position then the same dose of lidocaine will be repeated 10 minutes before anesthetic discontinuation.
standard general anesthetic technique, control group, group I
patients will undergo standard general anesthesia with classic endotracheal tube
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* body mass index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m2
* assignment to a single or double level lumbar laminectomy or discectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* local infection at site of catheter insertion
* recurrent disc surgery, emergency surgery
* coagulopathies
* hemoglobin \<8 g/dl
* history of stroke or psychiatric disease
* baseline neurological deficit
* active upper respiratory tract infections
* history of either laryngeal / tracheal surgery or pathology
* uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal dysfunction
* any contraindication for study technique or medications
* being on regular steroids, opioid analgesics or alpha 2 agonists.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zagazig University
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abeer M Elnakera, MD
principle investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
tarek Y Gaafar, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Zagazig University
abeer M elnakera, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zagazig University
abeer H alsawy
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Zagazig University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zagazig University Hospitals
Zagazig, Outside US, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZU-IRB #3225-18-12-2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.