Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models
NCT ID: NCT04955067
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-01
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Deep-learning For Ultrasound Classification of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury
NCT06372873
Deep-learning Enabled Ultrasound Diagnosis of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury
NCT06373029
Diagnostic Study of Lateral Ligament Complex Injury of Ankle
NCT04455386
MRI Appearance of Injured Ligament and Tendon of the Ankle in Different Postures
NCT03049423
Clinical Value of Deep Learning Reconstruction Technology in Ankle MRI
NCT07274423
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Establishment and comparison of various deep learning models: four deep learning models were established and compared in this study, namely VGG19, AlexNet, CapsNet, and GoogleNet. The models using image fitting alone and those combining with clinical physical examination data were compared for each deep learning model. The diagnostic efficiency between models was expressed by the ROC curve, including AUC, F1 score, etc. the ROC curve was further analyzed by t-test, Delong test, and other statistical methods. In this study, the data were divided into a training set (70%, 30% in the training set as the validation set), and the remaining 30% as the test set to evaluate the classification accuracy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Normal control group-Grade 0
Arthroscopic examination of the ankle joint was normal, and the ligament was intact without injury or tear.
Diagnositic test
The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object
Ligament injury -Grade 1
Arthroscopic examination of the ankle joint showed ligament degeneration or injury, but no local or complete tear.
Diagnositic test
The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object
Ligament tear-Grade 2
Arthroscopy of the ankle joint revealed partial or complete loss of ligaments.
Diagnositic test
The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diagnositic test
The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. MR of ankle joint was performed within 3 months before operation and the image quality was good;
3. Arthroscopic operation was performed in our hospital and the operation records were complete.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unclear image, serious artifact or incomplete clinical data.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
huishu Yuan, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking University Third Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2020460
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.