Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models

NCT ID: NCT04955067

Last Updated: 2021-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to study the injury of the anterior talofibular ligament by deep learning method and compare a variety of different deep learning models to establish a deep learning method that can accurately identify and grade the injury of anterior talofibular ligament, and obtain a model with better recognition and grading effect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Recognition and segmentation of anterior talofibular ligament based on DenseNet. Densenet was used to recognize the axial T2-fs image, and the image level was the most typical one. The labelimg program based on Python was used to locate the coordinates of the anterior talofibular ligament and then imported into Python for learning. All the data were divided into a training set (70%, and then 30% of the training set was selected as the verification set). The remaining 30% was used as the test set to evaluate the accuracy of model recognition. After identifying the anterior talofibular ligament, the local clipping and amplification are carried out to remove the redundant information. Finally, input the result to the next step.
2. Establishment and comparison of various deep learning models: four deep learning models were established and compared in this study, namely VGG19, AlexNet, CapsNet, and GoogleNet. The models using image fitting alone and those combining with clinical physical examination data were compared for each deep learning model. The diagnostic efficiency between models was expressed by the ROC curve, including AUC, F1 score, etc. the ROC curve was further analyzed by t-test, Delong test, and other statistical methods. In this study, the data were divided into a training set (70%, 30% in the training set as the validation set), and the remaining 30% as the test set to evaluate the classification accuracy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lateral Ligament, Ankle

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normal control group-Grade 0

Arthroscopic examination of the ankle joint was normal, and the ligament was intact without injury or tear.

Diagnositic test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object

Ligament injury -Grade 1

Arthroscopic examination of the ankle joint showed ligament degeneration or injury, but no local or complete tear.

Diagnositic test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object

Ligament tear-Grade 2

Arthroscopy of the ankle joint revealed partial or complete loss of ligaments.

Diagnositic test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diagnositic test

The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Without any treatment before imaging examination;
2. MR of ankle joint was performed within 3 months before operation and the image quality was good;
3. Arthroscopic operation was performed in our hospital and the operation records were complete.

Exclusion Criteria

1. history of ankle surgery, history of cancer or previous fractures.
2. Unclear image, serious artifact or incomplete clinical data.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

huishu Yuan, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Peking University Third Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

huishu Yuan, MD

Role: CONTACT

15810245738

Ming Ni, MD

Role: CONTACT

13884794867

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Huishu Yuan, Dr

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M2020460

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.