Clinical Application of the Apex of the Deep Cartilage in Evaluating the Femoral Tunnel of the ACL Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT04953546
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
52 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-01
2021-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ADC in Assessing Femoral Tunnel Position
NCT04937517
Anatomic and Biomechanical Investigation on ACL: A Cadaveric Study
NCT04957797
Anterior Tibial Subluxation in the Setting of ACL-injury and After ACL Reconstruction
NCT04956536
Ultrasound Evaluation of Hamstring Tendon Regeneration After ACL Reconstruction and Its Influence
NCT04961736
Study of Single And Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Graft Cross-sectional Dimensions
NCT02834962
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With the apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) as the symbol, the consistency of the two methods in the postoperatively computed tomography (CT) and microscopic evaluation of the position of the femoral tract of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was studied.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study.
Fifty-two patients requiring arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were enrolled in the Sports Medicine Department of Peking University Third Hospital.
Collect patients' basic information and preoperative conditions. During the operation, the patient's knee was bent 90°, and the center point was positioned according to the intact femoral stump. The horizontal distance from the ADC to the anterior bone margin (L1) and the horizontal distance from the center point of the bone tract (L1) were measured by the master, the first aid and the second aid, and the distance from the center point of the bone tract to the lower bone margin (D1) was measured, and the ratio of L1 /L1 was calculated (P1).
The horizontal distance from the ADC to the anterior bone margin (L2) and the horizontal distance from the center of the bone tract (L2) were measured by three investigators on postoperative CT films, and the distance from the center of the bone tract to the lower bone margin (D2) was also measured, and the ratio of L2 /L2 was calculated (P2).
Linear regression, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the consistency between the endoscopic assessment and CT assessment.
Expected results:
P1 and P2, D1 and D2 were positively correlated, and the linear relationship was significant. Bland-Altman diagram shows a good consistency.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACL group
According to the previous clinical diagnosis, volunteers who has suffered the ACL injury.
No Intervention
This is an observation study, with no intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No Intervention
This is an observation study, with no intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With isolated ACL injury (an ACL injury with no need for surgical repairs to other knee structures).
* All participants have no known disorders or diseases other than ACL rupture.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yong Ma, Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking University Third Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2021212
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.