Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures
NCT ID: NCT07023653
Last Updated: 2025-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-15
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Functional Outcome Between BQT and SBHT ACL Reconstruction
NCT04536246
Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02555917
Comparison of the Functional Outcome of Site Peroneus Longus Graft Donors With and Without Distal Stump Suturing of Peroneus Tendon Brevis on ACL Reconstruction Case in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta With 24 Patient as Subject Who Will Divide Into 2 Group.
NCT04431063
Anterior Cruciate Ligament-reconstruction: Quadriceps Tendon or Hamstrings Tendon? A Prospective Trial
NCT02173483
Comparison of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients.
NCT04644497
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All-Inside Technique
Patients With ACL Ruptures will undergo ACL reconstruction surgery with All-inside techniques
All-Inside Techniques
All-inside ACL reconstruction technique avoids creating full-length bone tunnels. Instead, it uses retrograde drilling to form bone sockets, and the graft is secured with adjustable-loop suspensory fixation on both the femur and tibia.
Complete Tibial Tunnel
Patients With ACL Ruptures will undergo ACL reconstruction surgery with complete tibial tunnel techniques
Complete Tibial Tunnel techniques
Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique is a conventional technique for ACL reconstruction which involves the creation of full-length bone tunnels in the tibia for graft passage via an anterograde approach. Graft fixation is typically achieved using a bio-interference screw on the tibial side and a fixed-loop suspensory device on the femoral side
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
All-Inside Techniques
All-inside ACL reconstruction technique avoids creating full-length bone tunnels. Instead, it uses retrograde drilling to form bone sockets, and the graft is secured with adjustable-loop suspensory fixation on both the femur and tibia.
Complete Tibial Tunnel techniques
Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique is a conventional technique for ACL reconstruction which involves the creation of full-length bone tunnels in the tibia for graft passage via an anterograde approach. Graft fixation is typically achieved using a bio-interference screw on the tibial side and a fixed-loop suspensory device on the femoral side
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients within the age range of 18 to 65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a pregnancy condition
* Patients with Severe Osteochondral Defect (ICRS 4)
* Patients with signs of inflamation in knee joint
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andri Maruli Tua Lubis
Prof. Dr. Andri M.T. Lubis, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prof. Dr. dr. Andri M.T. Lubis SpOT (K)
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indonesia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indonesian University Hospital
Depok, , Indonesia
Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Jakarta Pusat, , Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
dr. Adisa Yusuf Reksoprodjo SpOT (K)
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kouloumentas P, Kavroudakis E, Charalampidis E, Kavroudakis D, Triantafyllopoulos GK. Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3592-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05456-9. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Rahardja R, Zhu M, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW. Effect of Graft Choice on Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):63-69. doi: 10.1177/0363546519885148. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
Samitier G, Vinagre G. Hamstring Braid Graft Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Jul 19;8(8):e815-e820. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2019.03.022. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Kennedy JC, Weinberg HW, Wilson AS. The anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament. As determined by clinical and morphological studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Mar;56(2):223-35. No abstract available.
Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975 Jan-Feb;(106):216-31. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197501000-00033.
Tan JL, Chang PC, Mitra AK, Tay BK. Anthropometry of anterior cruciate ligament in Singaporean Chinese. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998 Nov;27(6):776-9.
Pontoh LA, Rahyussalim AJ, Widodo W, Fiolin J, Rhatomy S. Anthropometric study as a predictor of anterior cruciate ligament sizes in Asian Indonesian population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 Jan-Apr;29(1):23094990211000462. doi: 10.1177/23094990211000462.
Brown JA, Brophy RH, Franco J, Marquand A, Solomon TC, Watanabe D, Mandelbaum BR. Avoiding allograft length mismatch during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient height as an indicator of appropriate graft length. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):986-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298584. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
Denti M, Bigoni M, Randelli P, Monteleone M, Cevenini A, Ghezzi A, Schiavone Panni A, Trevisan C. Graft-tunnel mismatch in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Intraoperative and cadaver measurement of the intra-articular graft length and the length of the patellar tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(3):165-8. doi: 10.1007/s001670050093.
Meijer K, Saper M, Joyner P, Liu W, Andrews JR, Roth C. Minimizing Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Blumensaat's Line: A Cadaveric Study. Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2438-2443.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 3.
Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, Hung SC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):916-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1653-3. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Tang SP, Wan KH, Lee RH, Wong KK, Wong KK. Influence of hamstring autograft diameter on graft failure rate in Chinese population after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2020 Aug 12;22:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2020.07.005. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Colombet P, Graveleau N. An Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique With 4-Strand Semitendinosus Grafts, Using Outside-In Tibial Tunnel Drilling and Suspensory Fixation Devices. Arthrosc Tech. 2015 Sep 28;4(5):e507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.05.014. eCollection 2015 Oct.
Takahashi T, Watanabe S, Ito T. A Surgical Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Graft: An All-Inside Transfemoral Approach. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May 29;12(6):e975-e982. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.035. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Jones PE, Schuett DJ. All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Salvage for Small or Attenuated Hamstring Grafts. Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Apr 9;7(5):e453-e457. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.11.007. eCollection 2018 May.
Fritsch B, Figueroa F, Semay B. Graft Preparation Technique to Optimize Hamstring Graft Diameter for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Nov 13;6(6):e2169-e2175. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.011. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Rante SDT, Santoso A, Sibarani T, Utomo DN. All-inside vs. conventional method in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Indones J Biomed Sci. 2022;16(2):47-59.
Lubowitz JH, Schwartzberg R, Smith P. Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.009.
Ashraf Y, Senevirathna SR, Ashraf T. Conventional versus 'all-inside' anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial comparing hamstring strength and functional outcome. Bone Jt Open. 2020 Nov 4;1(11):706-708. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.111.BJO-2020-0012.R1.
Lubowitz JH, Ahmad CS, Anderson K. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011 May;27(5):717-27. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.008.
Lubowitz JH. No-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the transtibial all-inside technique. Arthroscopy. 2006 Aug;22(8):900.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.003.
Morgan CD, Kalmam VR, Grawl DM. Isometry testing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revisited. Arthroscopy. 1995 Dec;11(6):647-59. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90104-3.
Lin R, Zhong Q, Wu X, Cui L, Huang R, Deng Q, Zuo J, Jiang C, Li W. Randomized controlled trial of all-inside and standard single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with functional, MRI-based graft maturity and patient-reported outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 26;23(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05231-x.
Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):41-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511422999. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
Teng Y, Zhang X, Da L, Hu J, Wang H, Han H, Wu M, Zhang S, Xia Y. Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5.
Goyal T, Das L, Paul S, Choudhury AK, Sethy SS. Outcomes of retro-drilled all-inside tibial tunnel vs complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr;32(3):523-532. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03011-2. Epub 2021 May 24.
Connaughton AJ, Geeslin AG, Uggen CW. All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques? J Orthop. 2017 Mar 19;14(2):241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.03.002. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Bosco F, Giustra F, Ghirri A, Cacciola G, Masse A, Capella M. All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: Tips and Tricks. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 6;12(18):5793. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185793.
Evans S, Shaginaw J, Bartolozzi A. Acl reconstruction - it's all about timing. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;9(2):268-73.
Samitier G, Marcano AI, Alentorn-Geli E, Cugat R, Farmer KW, Moser MW. Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Oct;3(4):220-40.
Deviandri R, van der Veen HC, Lubis AMT, Postma MJ, van den Akker-Scheek I. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 29;9(9):23259671211038372. doi: 10.1177/23259671211038372. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Deviandri R, van der Veen HC, Lubis AMT, Utoyo GA, van den Akker-Scheek I, Postma MJ. Burden and Cost of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Reimbursement of Its Treatment in a Developing Country: An Observational Study in Indonesia. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jul 17;14:479-486. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S368840. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-07-0995
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.