Hamstring Muscle Strength After ACL Hamstring Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT05464485
Last Updated: 2022-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
33 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-01
2018-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament-reconstruction: Quadriceps Tendon or Hamstrings Tendon? A Prospective Trial
NCT02173483
Changes in Muscle Morphology Resulting From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT01537588
Reduced Knee Flexion Strength 18 Years After ACL Reconstruction in Hamstring Group Compared to Patellar Tendon Group
NCT05876013
Isoinertial Rehabilitation in Recovering Hamstring Strength Following Surgical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT06063915
Muscle Preservation Hamstring Graft for ACL Reconstruction
NCT03998904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A difference between the AMP and the TLS technique is that the AMP technique uses a double-bundle hamstring graft where the TLS technique uses a single-bundle hamstring graft. The idea is that using a single-bundle hamstring graft causes less hamstring muscle strength deficit. The available literature shows different outcomes of hamstring muscle strength deficit, although, there are no studies found in which the difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit between both techniques directly has been investigated.
Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the hamstring muscle strength deficit after AMP and TLS reconstruction techniques.
The primary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit at 60°/s flexion in patients with an ACL rupture (18-60 years) who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction 12 weeks after surgery.
The secondary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in muscle strength deficit at 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 12 weeks after surgery and 60°/s, 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 20 weeks after surgery in patients who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only
ACL reconstruction with a ST tendon graft received a reconstruction according to the Tape Locking Screw technique (FH Industrie, Quimper, France) with a dedicated interference screw
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon
ACL reconstruction with a ST/G tendon graft received a reconstruction with the anteromedial portal technique with endobutton fixation (Smith \& Nephew, London, UK).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only
ACL reconstruction with a ST tendon graft received a reconstruction according to the Tape Locking Screw technique (FH Industrie, Quimper, France) with a dedicated interference screw
ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon
ACL reconstruction with a ST/G tendon graft received a reconstruction with the anteromedial portal technique with endobutton fixation (Smith \& Nephew, London, UK).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mentally competent to understand the informed consent.
* Patient underwent AMP or TLS ACL reconstruction surgery or will undergo AMP or TLS ACL reconstruction surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Meniscus rupture larger than 25%
* Indication for meniscal repair.
* Injury of the collateral ligaments or posterior cruciate ligament
* History of ACL or meniscal rupture
* Neurological or systemic disorder that inhibit adequate rehabilitation
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Isala
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bart Robben
MD
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
60029.075.16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.