Hamstring Muscle Strength After ACL Hamstring Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT05464485

Last Updated: 2022-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructions using hamstring grafts can be performed using one or two hamstring grafts, the semitendinosus (ST) tendon only, or both the semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon. As most patients strive to return to sport nine months after reconstruction the purpose of this study was to compare the recovery of hamstring muscle strength during these first nine months after reconstruction using the ST or ST/G tendons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques are developing continuously. Studies have shown that anatomical positioning of the femur tunnel is an important predictor for the clinical outcome. This has led to the development of new reconstruction techniques with a more anatomical placement of the femur tunnel: the anteromedial portal (AMP) ACL reconstruction technique and, more recently, the tape locking screw (TLS) ACL reconstruction technique. Multiple retrospective studies have shown that patients have a better short term clinical outcome when the anteromedial portal (AMP) or the tape locking crew (TLS) reconstruction technique is used. At this moment, the most widely used technique is the AMP (performed in approximately 80% of the ACL reconstructions). The TLS technique is widely used in France and the available literature shows good short-term results.

A difference between the AMP and the TLS technique is that the AMP technique uses a double-bundle hamstring graft where the TLS technique uses a single-bundle hamstring graft. The idea is that using a single-bundle hamstring graft causes less hamstring muscle strength deficit. The available literature shows different outcomes of hamstring muscle strength deficit, although, there are no studies found in which the difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit between both techniques directly has been investigated.

Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the hamstring muscle strength deficit after AMP and TLS reconstruction techniques.

The primary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit at 60°/s flexion in patients with an ACL rupture (18-60 years) who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction 12 weeks after surgery.

The secondary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in muscle strength deficit at 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 12 weeks after surgery and 60°/s, 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 20 weeks after surgery in patients who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL reconstruction with a ST tendon graft received a reconstruction according to the Tape Locking Screw technique (FH Industrie, Quimper, France) with a dedicated interference screw

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL reconstruction with a ST/G tendon graft received a reconstruction with the anteromedial portal technique with endobutton fixation (Smith \& Nephew, London, UK).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus (ST) tendon only

ACL reconstruction with a ST tendon graft received a reconstruction according to the Tape Locking Screw technique (FH Industrie, Quimper, France) with a dedicated interference screw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL hamstring reconstructions using semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon

ACL reconstruction with a ST/G tendon graft received a reconstruction with the anteromedial portal technique with endobutton fixation (Smith \& Nephew, London, UK).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient older than 18 years and younger than 60 years old.
* Mentally competent to understand the informed consent.
* Patient underwent AMP or TLS ACL reconstruction surgery or will undergo AMP or TLS ACL reconstruction surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* ACL reconstruction surgery older than 12 weeks.
* Meniscus rupture larger than 25%
* Indication for meniscal repair.
* Injury of the collateral ligaments or posterior cruciate ligament
* History of ACL or meniscal rupture
* Neurological or systemic disorder that inhibit adequate rehabilitation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Isala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bart Robben

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

60029.075.16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.