Comparative Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon)

NCT ID: NCT02832791

Last Updated: 2018-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this randomized study is to compare clinical and functional outcomes of both surgery techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (using quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon) after reconstruction in athletes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. An ACL-deficient knee can lead to recurrent instability, meniscus tears, and osteoarthritis. Patients treated with an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have long term success rates of 80 percent to 95 percent. Graft selection may influence outcomes following ACLR. Despite the popularity of the procedure, the preferred graft remains controversial. In the past, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts have been considered the gold-standard surgical option. However, concerns regarding donor-site morbidity have led to a shift in practice by many surgeons to use quadruple hamstring tendons (HT).Several studies have shown a deficit in the quadriceps and the hamstrings strength after using HT as a graft for ACLR . Recently, there has been an increased interest in the quadriceps tendon as graft option for ACL reconstruction. The benefits of quadriceps tendon autograph include advantageous biomechanical properties, preservation of hamstring anatomy and function, as well as a reduced incidence of donor-site morbidity. To our knowledge there is no randomized controlled trial in the literature comparing QT and HTas autografts for ACLR.

Objective: The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare clinical and functional outcomes after using the QT and HT tendons for ACL reconstruction in athletes.

Methods: 55 athletes patients will be recruited from Martín Gómez Clinic from Granada (Spain) and Nutuality of footballers from Andalusian (Spain). Patients will be randomized in two groups: quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon. Clinical and functional outcomes will be measured before surgery and three and six months after that. All patients will be operated on by the same senior surgeon and both group will received the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Prior to the surgery the participants or their legal representatives must sign the informed consent for participation in this research.

Discussion: The benefits of ACL reconstruction surgery show enough scientific evidence that justifying the emergence of new procedures that improve the outcome of the surgery and the reduction of possible comorbidities. The high prevalence of this disease and the therapeutic success of ACL reconstruction makes that there is an increase of the number of subjects who have received this treatment. However, there is not enough randomized trials that examines the different techniques in terms of clinical and functional outcomes or the risk of comorbidities.

Subjects were placed in the upright position with the hip flexed at 90°. To determine the height of the chair, the lateral femoral condyle was aligned with the rotational axis of the dynamometer. Before each test, the patient was instructed to perform 3 practice repetitions. The highest peak torque value for each velocity was determined, compared to the uninjured side, and described as percent of knee extensor and flexor muscles strength deficits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

QUADRICEPS TENDON

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

QUADRICEPS TENDON

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Once the limb is prepped and draped,it is exsanguinated, and the tourniquet is raised to 250 mm Hg. We will make an arthroscopic examination through an anterolateral viewing portal to corroborate the ACL injury as well as the determination of possible associated lesions. The accessory medial portal is stablished slightly above the joint line (about 2 cm of the medial edge of the patel) that is used as an instrumentation portal. Then,, a high anteromedial portal, is made higher than the previous to see the femoral footprint. Once the associated meniscal or cartilaginous lesions are addressed attention turns to the harvesting of the graft. A 4 cm vertical incision is made starting at the proximal pole of the patella and directed proximally and centered in line with the quadriceps tendon. The subcutaneous tissue is dissected and a 70-80 mm long ,10 mm wide and 7mm depth graft is obtained with the use of a n21 scalpel 2cm of both limbs of the graft are sutured

HAMSTRING TENDON

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING TENDON

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HAMSTRING TENDON

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Once the limb is prepped and draped,it is exsanguinated, and the tourniquet is raised to 250 mm Hg. The procedure begins with an arthroscopic examination through an anterolateral viewing portal to corroborate the ACL injury as well as the determination of possible associated lesions. The accessory medial portal is stablished slightly above the joint line, at about 2 cm of the medial edge of the patellar tendon. This portal is used as an instrumentation portal. A third portal, a high anteromedial portal, is made higher than the previous, this portal will allow visualization of the femoral footprint.

Once the associated meniscal or cartilaginous lesions are addressed attention turns to the harvesting of the graft.

A 4cm oblique incision is made starting 2 cm medial to the tibial tubercle and directed proximally and medially. After dissecting the subcutaneous tissue the Sartorius fascia is incised and both tendons are identified and harvested with the use of a tendon stripper

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

QUADRICEPS TENDON

Once the limb is prepped and draped,it is exsanguinated, and the tourniquet is raised to 250 mm Hg. We will make an arthroscopic examination through an anterolateral viewing portal to corroborate the ACL injury as well as the determination of possible associated lesions. The accessory medial portal is stablished slightly above the joint line (about 2 cm of the medial edge of the patel) that is used as an instrumentation portal. Then,, a high anteromedial portal, is made higher than the previous to see the femoral footprint. Once the associated meniscal or cartilaginous lesions are addressed attention turns to the harvesting of the graft. A 4 cm vertical incision is made starting at the proximal pole of the patella and directed proximally and centered in line with the quadriceps tendon. The subcutaneous tissue is dissected and a 70-80 mm long ,10 mm wide and 7mm depth graft is obtained with the use of a n21 scalpel 2cm of both limbs of the graft are sutured

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

HAMSTRING TENDON

Once the limb is prepped and draped,it is exsanguinated, and the tourniquet is raised to 250 mm Hg. The procedure begins with an arthroscopic examination through an anterolateral viewing portal to corroborate the ACL injury as well as the determination of possible associated lesions. The accessory medial portal is stablished slightly above the joint line, at about 2 cm of the medial edge of the patellar tendon. This portal is used as an instrumentation portal. A third portal, a high anteromedial portal, is made higher than the previous, this portal will allow visualization of the femoral footprint.

Once the associated meniscal or cartilaginous lesions are addressed attention turns to the harvesting of the graft.

A 4cm oblique incision is made starting 2 cm medial to the tibial tubercle and directed proximally and medially. After dissecting the subcutaneous tissue the Sartorius fascia is incised and both tendons are identified and harvested with the use of a tendon stripper

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

quadriceps tendon graft hamstring tendon graft

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ages: \< 40 years old
* Genders eligible for Study: both

Exclusion Criteria

* LCA injury diagnosis base on clinical and radiographic features with less than 6 months of evolution of the lesion at diagnosis time.
* Recreational or federated athletes
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de Granada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Irene Cantarero Villanueva

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Luis Martín-Alguacil

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Martín Gómez Clinic from Granada (Spain) and Nutuality of footballers from Andalusian (Spain)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Facultad Ciencias de la Salud

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P16-R13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.