Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury is very common knee injury. Especially Anterior cruciate ligament complete rupture leads to knee joint instability and degenerative change of the knee. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is performed for resolving these problems and it gives excellent results. For leading to successful result of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, selecting of appropriate femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel is necessary. If selecting inappropriate tibial tunnel location makes pain, synovitis, impingement of transplanted tendon, loss of range of motion, instability, failure of transplantation and risk of arthritis. It is known that selection of inappropriate tibial tunnel location is the most common cause of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure.

Recently many studies reconstructed at anatomical lesion instead of isometric point. And some cadaver studies reported that tibial insertion of anterior cruciate ligament has "C" shape. There are two methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. One is preserving remnant and the other is removing remnant.

This study aims to compare the tibia and femoral tunnel location of remnant preserving and remnant resecting anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction Versus Primary Repair

NCT07318272

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Isokinetic Test

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures

NCT07023653

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

RECRUITING NA

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

NCT05584020

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

RECRUITING NA

Long-term Clinical and Radiographic Results of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Single-bundle Technique and External Tenodesis With Achilles Tendon Allograft.

NCT06868147

ACL LET

RECRUITING

Comparison of Dynamic Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes in Anatomical ACL Reconstruction at AM or Central Position

NCT02074917

Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Complete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate Ligament

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study design is a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Randomly, twenty patients planed to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft by remnant preserving and other twenty patients undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft by resecting anterior cruciate ligament. The clinical outcome is comparative preoperative, postoperative 6weeks, 3months, 6months and 1years. And clinical score consists of Visual Analog Score, lachman test, anterior laxity, Lysholm knee score, international knee documentation committee score. Femoral and tibial tunnel location will be analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography using Bernard quadrant method after surgery.

The present study aimed to determine and compare (1) the accuracy of tibia and femoral tunnel location and (2) postoperative functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between remnant preserving group versus remnant resecting group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remnant preserving

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:

anterior cruciate ligament remnant will be preserved in the operation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Twenty patients planed to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant and other twenty patients undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant.

Remnant resecting

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:

anterior cruciate ligament remnant will be removed in the operation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Twenty patients planed to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant and other twenty patients undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Twenty patients planed to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant and other twenty patients undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by preserving remnant.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE