Comparison of Functional Outcome Between BQT and SBHT ACL Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT04536246
Last Updated: 2020-09-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-01
2017-11-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures
NCT07023653
Reconstruction of the ACL With QT Graft With Bone Plug vs BPTB
NCT06189573
Single and Double Bundle ACL Reconstructions, in Term of Cartilage Damage Due to Remaining Instability After Surgery.
NCT04626999
Comparison of the Functional Outcome of Site Peroneus Longus Graft Donors With and Without Distal Stump Suturing of Peroneus Tendon Brevis on ACL Reconstruction Case in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta With 24 Patient as Subject Who Will Divide Into 2 Group.
NCT04431063
Functional Outcomes Comparison in Patients Using Knee Brace Post ACL Reconstruction With Autograft Bone Quadricep Tendon
NCT05457452
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To obtain a valid and accountable research data, the investigators collected the information based on 2 parameters and then crosschecked the results.
After clinical data was obtained, the investigators translate the results into a statistical data using SPSS ver.24 and simplified the data for national registry and academic purposes.
According to previous studies, and research hypothesis, functional outcome of patient undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction is better in BQT group compared to SBHT group, both in subjective and objective parameters given.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BQT Group
Procedure on this arm = bone quadriceps tendon reconstruction
Bone Quadriceps Tendon (BQT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction
New intervention method deployed in Indonesia to gain better clinical outcome for ACL--deficient patients requiring surgical treatment
SBHT Group
Procedure on this arm = single-bundle hamstring tendon reconstruction
Single-Bundle Hamstring Tendon (SBHT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction
Comparator for New Reconstruction Technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bone Quadriceps Tendon (BQT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction
New intervention method deployed in Indonesia to gain better clinical outcome for ACL--deficient patients requiring surgical treatment
Single-Bundle Hamstring Tendon (SBHT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction
Comparator for New Reconstruction Technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Procedure performed by the same surgeon
* Age of subjects between 15-40 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral ACL ruptures
* Ligamentous laxity
* Prior knee ligamentous surgery
15 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andri Maruli Tua Lubis
Head of Orthopaedic Sports and Arthroscopy Division, Principal Investigator
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cavaignac E, Coulin B, Tscholl P, Nik Mohd Fatmy N, Duthon V, Menetrey J. Is Quadriceps Tendon Autograft a Better Choice Than Hamstring Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of 3.6 Years. Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1326-1332. doi: 10.1177/0363546516688665. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
Lee JK, Lee S, Lee MC. Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Graft. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2323-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650666. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
Haner M, Bierke S, Petersen W. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: Ipsilateral Quadriceps Versus Contralateral Semitendinosus-Gracilis Autografts. Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2308-2317. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 May 18.
Akoto R, Hoeher J. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft and press-fit fixation using an anteromedial portal technique. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 27;13:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-161.
Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan;26(1):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S208-28. doi: 10.1002/acr.20632. No abstract available.
Bekkers JE, de Windt TS, Raijmakers NJ, Dhert WJ, Saris DB. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Nov;17(11):1434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 May 7.
Schulz AP, Lange V, Gille J, Voigt C, Frohlich S, Stuhr M, Jurgens C. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24-36 months. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013 Nov 19;4:243-9. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S49223. eCollection 2013.
Mologne T, Friedman M. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate reconstruction with hamstring tendons: indications, surgical technique, and complications and their treatment. In: Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2006.
Chen V, Hunter R, Woolf J. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. In: Schepsis A, Busconi B, editors. Orthopaedic Surgery Essential - Sports Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Pavlovich R Jr, Goldberg SH, Bach BR Jr. Adolescent ACL injury: treatment considerations. J Knee Surg. 2004 Apr;17(2):79-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248203.
Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2321-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00539.
Shi DL, Yao ZJ. Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar or hamstring tendon: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(23):4056-62.
Peter Layde SLC, Layde P, Guse CE, Schlotthauer AE, Valin SE Van. The Incidence and Etiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Patients under the Age of 18 in the State of Wisconsin. Pediatr Ther [Internet]. 2014;04(02). Available from: https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-incidence-and-etiology-of-anterior-cruciate-ligament-injuries-in-patients-under-the-age-of-in-the-state-of-wisconsin-2161-0665.1000196.php?aid=26065
Collins JE, Katz JN, Donnell-Fink LA, Martin SD, Losina E. Cumulative incidence of ACL reconstruction after ACL injury in adults: role of age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):544-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472042. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Tow BP, Chang PC, Mitra AK, Tay BK, Wong MC. Comparing 2-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patella-tendon or semitendinosus-tendon autografts: a non-randomised prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005 Aug;13(2):139-46. doi: 10.1177/230949900501300206.
Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Webb VJ, Davies A, Pinczewski LA. Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with an ipsilateral patellar tendon autograft. A prospective longitudinal five-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):984-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.10573.
Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Demontis A, Fabbriciani C. Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9(2):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s001670000171.
Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Schneider T, Bruggemann GP, Koebke J. Biomechanical testing of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone grafts: an alternative graft source for press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 May;126(4):265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0048-7. Epub 2005 Sep 17.
Staeubli HU, Bollmann C, Kreutz R, Becker W, Rauschning W. Quantification of intact quadriceps tendon, quadriceps tendon insertion, and suprapatellar fat pad: MR arthrography, anatomy, and cryosections in the sagittal plane. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Sep;173(3):691-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470905.
Lee S, Seong SC, Jo H, Park YK, Lee MC. Outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct;20(8):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.009.
Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1751-67. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279922.
Sofu H, Sahin V, Gursu S, Yildirim T, Issin A, Ordueri M. Use of quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative analysis of clinical results. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2013;24(3):139-43. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2013.31.
van Eck CF, Kropf EJ, Romanowski JR, Lesniak BP, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, Fu FH. Factors that influence the intra-articular rupture pattern of the ACL graft following single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1427-y. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
Ramski DE, Kanj WW, Franklin CC, Baldwin KD, Ganley TJ. Anterior cruciate ligament tears in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of nonoperative versus operative treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2769-76. doi: 10.1177/0363546513510889. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BQT-SBHT-FMUI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.