Functional Outcomes Comparison in Patients Using Knee Brace Post ACL Reconstruction With Autograft Bone Quadricep Tendon
NCT ID: NCT05457452
Last Updated: 2022-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Functional Outcome Between BQT and SBHT ACL Reconstruction
NCT04536246
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures
NCT07023653
Comparison of the Functional Outcome of Site Peroneus Longus Graft Donors With and Without Distal Stump Suturing of Peroneus Tendon Brevis on ACL Reconstruction Case in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta With 24 Patient as Subject Who Will Divide Into 2 Group.
NCT04431063
Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction RCT
NCT05461326
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Bone Tendon Bone Autograft With Versus Without Internal Bracing
NCT05532189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The research will be conducted at the National Central General Hospital dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta Police Hospital and Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Knee Brace
Use of a Knee Brace after ACL Reconstruction, the patient is put on a knee brace by an orthopedic doctor or orthopedic resident after ACL reconstruction
Knee Brace
Installation of an angle-adjustable knee brace, used after ACL reconstruction performed by an orthopedic specialist or orthopedic PPDS with the first week the angle locked at 00, in the second week the angle 0-900, in the third week the angle 0-1200, and the fourth week the angle of flexion full. Braces are used except for physical therapy according to the rehabilitation protocol in the first week.
No Knee Brace
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Knee Brace
Installation of an angle-adjustable knee brace, used after ACL reconstruction performed by an orthopedic specialist or orthopedic PPDS with the first week the angle locked at 00, in the second week the angle 0-900, in the third week the angle 0-1200, and the fourth week the angle of flexion full. Braces are used except for physical therapy according to the rehabilitation protocol in the first week.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with ACL rupture without other ligament ruptures undergoing ACL reconstruction
* Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using Quadricep Tendon Autograft
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with previous history of ACL reconstruction
* Patients with recurrent rupture during the observation period
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Danarto Hari Adhimukti
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Orthpaedic and Traumatology RSCM-FKUI
Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lowe WR, Warth RJ, Davis EP, Bailey L. Functional Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;25(3):239-249. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00710.
Kaeding CC, Leger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Montalvo AM, Schneider DK, Webster KE, Yut L, Galloway MT, Heidt RS Jr, Kaeding CC, Kremcheck TE, Magnussen RA, Parikh SN, Stanfield DT, Wall EJ, Myer GD. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injury Incidence by Sex and Sport Classification. J Athl Train. 2019 May;54(5):472-482. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-407-16. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
Chan CX, Wong KL, Toh SJ, Krishna L. Epidemiology of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries undergoing reconstruction surgery in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Res Sports Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;29(1):12-24. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2018.1492391. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
Dzakiya FNA, Tinduh D, Utomo DN. Risk Estimation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury in East Java Puslatda Pencak Silat Athletes. Surabaya Phys Med Rehabil J. 2021;3:29.
Lubis AM, Dasril DF. Comparison of functional outcome between bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) and single-bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft in arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cases: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 13;60:509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.023. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Rudy, Mustamsir E, Phatama KY. Tensile strength comparison between peroneus longus and hamstring tendons: A biomechanical study. Int J Surg Open [Internet]. 2017;9:41-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2017.10.002
Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Beynnon BD, Engstrom B, Peura G. The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in weightbearing and nonweightbearing knees. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;28(6):815-24. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280060901.
Perrone GS, Webster KE, Imbriaco C, Portilla GM, Vairagade A, Murray MM, Kiapour AM. Risk of Secondary ACL Injury in Adolescents Prescribed Functional Bracing After ACL Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Nov 12;7(11):2325967119879880. doi: 10.1177/2325967119879880. eCollection 2019 Nov.
Melegati G, Tornese D, Bandi M, Volpi P, Schonhuber H, Denti M. The role of the rehabilitation brace in restoring knee extension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Sep;11(5):322-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0386-3. Epub 2003 Jul 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INDO321
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.