Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure During Mechanical Ventilation Recruitment Maneuver
NCT ID: NCT04935008
Last Updated: 2022-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2022-02-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inflammatory Effects of a Lung Recruitment Manoeuvre
NCT01070654
Recruitment Manoeuvres in Critically Ill Patients
NCT05508724
Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients
NCT04459884
Practice of Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients Without ARDS
NCT01868321
Effect of Transition From Mechanical Ventilation to Spontaneous Breathing on Intraocular Pressure in ICU (VENT-IOP)
NCT07188922
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although the recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and reduces mortality, especially in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), adverse side effects are sometimes observed. Most important of these are the risk of barotrauma after positive airway pressure applications, increased intrathoracic pressure and hemodynamic instability, and increased intracranial pressure risk after venous return disorder.
Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of recruitment maneuver on intracranial pressure by measuring optic nerve diameter with ultrasound before and after its application in patients with ARDS with impaired oxygenation and followed up with mechanical ventilator support.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Effect of recruitment maneuver on intracranial pressure
A recruitment maneuver will be performed in patients with decreased oxygen saturation due to atelectasis by applying 30 cm H2O positive pressure support for 30 seconds. The effect of the recruitment maneuver on intracranial pressure will be investigated by measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter with the help of ultrasonography before and after the recruitment maneuver.
The recruitment maneuver
In patients with ARDS, 30 cm H2O positive pressure support and 30 seconds recruitment maneuver will be applied. The effect of the recruitment maneuver on intracranial pressure will be investigated by measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter with the help of ultrasonography before and after the recruitment maneuver. Optic nerve diameter will be evaluated with a linear probe on the eyeball before and after the collection maneuver, taking a value of 3 mm from the eyeball.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The recruitment maneuver
In patients with ARDS, 30 cm H2O positive pressure support and 30 seconds recruitment maneuver will be applied. The effect of the recruitment maneuver on intracranial pressure will be investigated by measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter with the help of ultrasonography before and after the recruitment maneuver. Optic nerve diameter will be evaluated with a linear probe on the eyeball before and after the collection maneuver, taking a value of 3 mm from the eyeball.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients followed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
* Patients on mechanical ventilation support
* Patients diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin criteria
* Patients with oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 92%
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with increased inotropic drug requirement or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg in the last 2 hours
* Patients with intracranial hypertension
* Patients with acute coronary syndrome
* Patients with hypercapnia, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and pneumomediastinum
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ozgur Komurcu
Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
özgür kömürcü, 1
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi
Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cortes I, Penuelas O, Esteban A. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: evaluation and management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Mar;78(3):343-57.
Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):294-323. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9604014. No abstract available.
Gattinoni L, Agostoni A, Pesenti A, Pelizzola A, Rossi GP, Langer M, Vesconi S, Uziel L, Fox U, Longoni F, Kolobow T, Damia G. Treatment of acute respiratory failure with low-frequency positive-pressure ventilation and extracorporeal removal of CO2. Lancet. 1980 Aug 9;2(8189):292-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90237-8.
Lim SC, Adams AB, Simonson DA, Dries DJ, Broccard AF, Hotchkiss JR, Marini JJ. Intercomparison of recruitment maneuver efficacy in three models of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2371-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147445.73344.3a.
Marini JJ. Recruitment by sustained inflation: time for a change. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Oct;37(10):1572-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2329-7. Epub 2011 Aug 20. No abstract available.
Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):347-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602.
Lapinsky SE, Mehta S. Bench-to-bedside review: Recruitment and recruiting maneuvers. Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):60-5. doi: 10.1186/cc2934. Epub 2004 Aug 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/528
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.