Maneuver for Evaluating the Potential Recruitability of the Pulmonary Parenchyme in Patients With ARDS
NCT ID: NCT04387669
Last Updated: 2020-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-04-12
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of a Simple Approach to Estimate Alveolar Recruitability in ARDS Patients
NCT02457741
Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers, Intracerebral Hemodynamic and Oxygenation
NCT02574169
Comparison of Two Methods to Estimate the Lung Recruitment
NCT00759590
Regional Assessment of the Risk of Lung Injury in Ventilated Patients
NCT06486259
How to Predict Lung Recruitment at the Bedside in Patients Affected by Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ALI/ARDS)
NCT00682942
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by a major loss of lung volume due to alveolar flooding, atelectasis and consolidation. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) permit to recruit non-aerated or poorly aerated lung tissue, and thus may improve gas exchange and oxygenation in patients with ARDS. However, ARM may also be harmful by overdistending the previously open lung tissue and can induce hemodynamic instability. The potential effectiveness and benefit of ARM depends on the patient's recruitability. A simple, routinely applicable bedside method to assess recruitability has been described in 2020 and is as efficient as multiple pressure-volume curves. We called it MERP for Potential for lung Recruitability Evaluation Method.
The investigators therefore propose to use this new method that determine lung recruitability as a diagnostic test to determine responder an non responder to ARM, and define a threshold.
Objectives:
The major aim is to determine the threshold of Vrec with the best sensitivity and specificity to define patient responders to alveolar recruitment maneuvers in ARDS.
The secondary objectives are :
* Evaluate the differences in morbi-mortality comparing responders and non responders to ARM
* Calculate the mean time of realization of the MERP+ARM maneuvers
* Estimate the occurence of secondary effects due to ARM (hemodynamic instability, arrhythmia, hypoxemia)
Methods:
This study will enroll at least 42 patients from the three Intensive Care Units at CHU Caen Normandy in 18 months. In all patients a MERP will be performed to determine the recruitable volume (Vrec). It consists to a brutal drop in PEEP level from 15 cmH2O to 5 cmH2O over a single breath maneuver to determine the increased end expiratory volume at the next respiratory cycle. The difference between this volume and the tidal volume represent the " measured recruitable volume " (Vmes). We can therefore calculate the predicted change in lung volume (Vcalc) by the product of respiratory system compliance at low PEEP (5 cmH20) and the change in pressure (10 cmH2O). Finally, the Vrec for each patients is the difference between the Vmes and the Vcalc.
An alveolar recruitment maneuver is then performed following the maximal alveolar recruitment method (driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, with 3 steps of PEEP 20-25-30 cmH2O) followed by a decremental PEEP procedure to determine the best PEEP. 15 minutes a posteriori, a blood gas sample permits to calculate the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
Data Analysis:
The primary endpoint is to determine the threshold of Vrec that permits to identify responders to alveolar recruitment maneuvers defined by an improvement of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio \> 20% 15 minutes after ARM, through ROC curve and Youden index.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Receiving assist/control mechanical ventilation with continuous sedation and neuromuscular blocker
* In supine position during the procedures and measurements
* Patients \> 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant woman
* Patient deprived of freedom or under a legal protective measure
* Hemodynamic instability defined as a mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg or increasing doses of vasopressor drugs
* Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pleural fistula, sub-cutaneous emphysema
* Chronic or recent severe cardiac dysfunction
* Patient with a PEEP \> 15 cmH20 before inclusion
* Patient with no therapeutic perspective; candidate for palliative care exclusively or with end of life decision before inclusion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire - CHU Caen
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen L, Brochard L. Lung volume assessment in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Jun;21(3):259-64. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000193.
Hess DR. Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP Titration. Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1688-704. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04409.
Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura EA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimaraes HP, Romano ER, Regenga MM, Taniguchi LNT, Teixeira C, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Machado FR, Diaz-Quijano FA, Filho MSA, Maia IS, Caser EB, Filho WO, Borges MC, Martins PA, Matsui M, Ospina-Tascon GA, Giancursi TS, Giraldo-Ramirez ND, Vieira SRR, Assef MDGPL, Hasan MS, Szczeklik W, Rios F, Amato MBP, Berwanger O, Ribeiro de Carvalho CR. Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
Chen L, Chen GQ, Shore K, Shklar O, Martins C, Devenyi B, Lindsay P, McPhail H, Lanys A, Soliman I, Tuma M, Kim M, Porretta K, Greco P, Every H, Hayes C, Baker A, Friedrich JO, Brochard L. Implementing a bedside assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2017 Apr 4;21(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1671-8.
Chen L, Del Sorbo L, Grieco DL, Junhasavasdikul D, Rittayamai N, Soliman I, Sklar MC, Rauseo M, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Richard JM, Brochard L. Potential for Lung Recruitment Estimated by the Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan 15;201(2):178-187. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0334OC.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-058
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.