Study of the Economics of Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

NCT ID: NCT00234767

Last Updated: 2008-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

650 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study of the long term outcomes and economic impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS/ALI) patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a commonly used device that provides hemodynamic data to guide care of the critically ill, such as patients with acute lung injury or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS/ALI). Clinicians believe PAC use improves decision-making and patient outcomes but evidence is lacking and recent data suggest the PAC may increase mortality as well as considerably increasing costs. In response, the NHLBI funded a large multicenter trial (Fluid And Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) (N01-HR-46054-46064)) where ARDS/ALI patients were randomized to receive a PAC or the less invasive central venous catheter (CVC) and received a liberal or conservative fluid management protocol in response to data provided by the PAC or CVC. The primary end-point is in-patient mortality.

We are complementing FACTT with a concurrent economic analysis of the PAC. Our aims are to: 1.) compare differences between study arms in long-term survival, quality of life, and quality-adjusted survival; 2.) compare differences between study arms in acute care and long-term costs; 3.) calculate the cost-efficacy of PAC use (i.e., the balance of costs and effects under the controlled environment of the FACTT trial), and; 4.) estimate cost-effectiveness under more "real-world" conditions and produce life-time cost-effectiveness ratios, thereby facilitating comparison of our results to other cost-effectiveness analyses.

We are achieving Aims 1-3 by augmenting FACTT data collection with detailed information on hospital costs, extended survival follow-up for a minimum of one year, and post-discharge patient interviews to determine quality of life and resource use in the first year. We will achieve Aim 4 by constructing a microsimulation model first calibrated by results from FACTT and published data on life-expectancy and costs and then adjusted to reflect the broader patient case-mix and clinical effects of PAC use in routine clinical practice. We are using patient-level data from the King County Lung Injury Project epidemiology study (NHLBI HL-96-014) to adjust case-mix and patient-level data from a large pragmatic trial of PAC use in the United Kingdom to adjust the clinical effects of PAC use.

The results of our adjunct to FACTT will substantially amplify the value of the data being collected and provide, for the first time, robust estimates from randomized data of the economic effects of the widespread application of this important technology.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Acute Lung Injury Lung Diseases

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS Acute Lung Injury ALI Cost-effectiveness Pharmacoeconomics Long-term follow-up

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pulmonary Artery Catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Protocolized Fluid Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Enrolled in the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT)

Exclusion Criteria

* Did not consent to economic substudy and long-term follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Derek C Angus, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clermont G, Kong L, Weissfeld LA, Lave JR, Rubenfeld GD, Roberts MS, Connors AF Jr, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Wheeler AP, Angus DC; NHLBI ARDS Clinical Trials Network. The effect of pulmonary artery catheter use on costs and long-term outcomes of acute lung injury. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022512. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21811626 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ccm.upmc.edu/research/res_crisma.html

CRISMA Laboratory Webpage- CRISMA coordinates the EA-PAC study

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HS011620

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link