The Global En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Registry
NCT ID: NCT04934540
Last Updated: 2024-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transurethral Modified En Bloc Resection For Large Bladder Tumours.
NCT04081246
Transurethral En Bloc Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour
NCT02993211
En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors
NCT04784507
En Bloc Bladder Tumor Resection: Prospective Randomized Study
NCT04712201
First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Endoluminal Robotic System for En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours
NCT06281080
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bladder cancer is classified into non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) according to its depth of invasion. Conceptually, NMIBC is amenable to complete resection by transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) alone, while MIBC requires more aggressive treatment in the form of radical cystectomy. The gold standard in local staging is by histology, and this can be achieved by TURBT. However, conventional TURBT creates charred tissue chips in a piecemeal manner which may hinder pathologists' judgment of the tumour base clearance. Second-look TURBT has been shown to detect residual disease in 33-55% of the patients, and upstaging of disease in 4-45% of the patients following the first TURBT; it has also been shown to improve recurrence-free survival in patients with T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition, tumour fragmentation and reimplantation may lead to early disease recurrence. All these highlighted the limitations of the conventional TURBT procedure.
Transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) represents a novel surgical technique in which the bladder tumour is resected in one piece. Theoretically, ERBT may prevent recurrence by minimizing the risk of tumour reimplantation and ensuring complete resection based on proper histological assessment. Although ERBT has been practised in many centres worldwide, there is a lack of high quality evidence in proving its superiority over conventional TURBT. Also, the optimal indications, best energy modality, the need for routine tumour base biopsy, intravesical chemotherapy, second-look TURBT and the optimal follow-up protocol remain uncertain for this technique. Therefore, there is a need for a well-planned prospective multi-centre study to evaluate the role of ERBT in the management of bladder cancer.
Investigators propose to conduct a prospective, multi-centre, registry study to expedite understanding of ERBT and to establish its role in management of bladder cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients undergoing ERBT
Patients who are diagnosed with bladder tumors and planning for ERBT.
En bloc resection of bladder tumour
En bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) is a novel surgical technique in which the bladder tumour is resected in one piece
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
En bloc resection of bladder tumour
En bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) is a novel surgical technique in which the bladder tumour is resected in one piece
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of bladder tumour undergoing transurethral ERBT
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of other active malignancy
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeremy Yuen Chun TEOH
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeremy YC TEOH, FRCS(Ed) MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
North District Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Joseph KM Li
Role: primary
Jeremy YC Teoh
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Grimm MO, Steinhoff C, Simon X, Spiegelhalder P, Ackermann R, Vogeli TA. Effect of routine repeat transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer: a long-term observational study. J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):433-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070437.14275.e0.
Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U, Altok M, Zorlu F. Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
Jahnson S, Wiklund F, Duchek M, Mestad O, Rintala E, Hellsten S, Malmstrom PU. Results of second-look resection after primary resection of T1 tumour of the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(3):206-10. doi: 10.1080/00365590510007793-1.
Lazica DA, Roth S, Brandt AS, Bottcher S, Mathers MJ, Ubrig B. Second transurethral resection after Ta high-grade bladder tumor: a 4.5-year period at a single university center. Urol Int. 2014;92(2):131-5. doi: 10.1159/000353089. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Vasdev N, Dominguez-Escrig J, Paez E, Johnson MI, Durkan GC, Thorpe AC. The impact of early re-resection in patients with pT1 high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:269. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2012.269. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Simon R, Eltze E, Schafer KL, Burger H, Semjonow A, Hertle L, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Terpe HJ, Bocker W. Cytogenetic analysis of multifocal bladder cancer supports a monoclonal origin and intraepithelial spread of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2001 Jan 1;61(1):355-62.
Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Hernandez V, Kaasinen E, Palou J, Roupret M, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Soukup V, Sylvester RJ, Zigeuner R. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):447-461. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE 2020.369
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.