Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
201 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2022-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Labor podcasts - Seven labor podcasts that can be downloaded for any podcast app
2. Usual care
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pulsatile Pressure Waveform to Confirm Correct Placement of the Epidural in Laboring Patients
NCT02395796
Simulation-Based Training for Epidural Analgesia Placement
NCT07056140
Active Management Of Risk In Pregnancy At Term to Reduce Rate of Cesarean Deliveries
NCT00598260
eDoula Feasibility and Acceptability
NCT06785467
The Efficacy of Early Amniotomy for Induction of Labor
NCT00133016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background Recently, podcasts have been used for both undergraduate and graduate medical education, with studies showing that they are feasible, acceptable, and effective. Learners appear to enjoy podcast learning because they increased efficiency by allowing listeners to multitask, made listeners keep up to date with medical literature, and increased overall knowledge. However, podcast learning has not been as widespread for patient education. There have been some studies that showed that podcast patient education is feasible, and one small study showed increased knowledge scores after listening to podcasts.
To our knowledge, podcast learning has never been studied in the obstetric population. Labor and delivery is usually a time that is fraught with questions from first time mothers, and more education may increase these women's perception of control and satisfaction overall with birth and the postpartum period. The Labor Agentry Scale (LAS)-10 is a validated instrument measuring expectancies and experiences of personal control during childbirth. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is also a validated scale that measures levels of postpartum depression that is commonly used at our institution both immediately postpartum and at the postpartum visit 4-6 weeks after delivery.
Study Design Design Pregnant patients between 28w0d - 36w0d will be randomized to one of the following study arms upon enrollment. Patients will be approached after 20 weeks for consent and randomized after they reach 28 weeks. The study will be done in an intent-to-treat fashion. Due to the nature of the study, blinding will not be possible.
Study Arms 1) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download seven HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum
o Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth, Normal Labor
* LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
* EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
2\. Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions:
* LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
* EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
Study duration Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete the study Length of a subject's participation time in study Project date of the proposed study
Estimated length of time to enroll all subjects and complete study:
Based on previous studies using the LAS-10, average score ranged between 45-53/70, with standard deviations ranging from 6-12. Therefore, we would estimate that the LAS score in the usual care group to be approximately 50. To be able to detect an effect size of 4, with a standard deviation of 9, and to achieve a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05, we would need a sample size of approximately 79 subjects per group. Calculating for a 20% loss to follow-up rate, we would anticipate recruiting 95 subjects per group.
Our city has an average of 16% preterm birth rate. Our hospital averages 1400 nulliparous deliveries/year. We would conservatively estimate approaching 50% of these women in the prenatal period for enrollment. If we assume a 75% consent rate for the RCT, which is standard for our center, we anticipate enrolling 30-36 women per month in our study. We would therefore anticipate it taking 6 months before we reach our target sample size.
We would then require an additional 6 months to compile and analyze the data.
Length of subject's participation:
Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum Women will be followed from time of consent until 7 days postpartum.
Project date of the proposed study:
Proposed to start April 2021 for recruitment and enrollment. We anticipate enrolling all patients by end of September 2021. We would likely be able to conclude the study by April 2022.
Resources necessary for human research protection Subjects will be recruited from looking at antepartum clinic charts and messaged via MPM once they are deemed eligible. This can be one by Dr. Cai and Dr. Srinivas. Both will be trained in the study protocol prior to enrolling subjects.
The research staff will also distribute information regarding the study to the aforementioned prenatal clinics so that written information can be handed out by providers to patients. This will allow for patients to be aware of the study. However, only study personnel will be able to consent and enroll patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Study Arms
1. Labor Podcast Group
2. Usual Teaching
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Labor Podcast Group
1\) Labor Podcast Group - Women randomized to this arm will receive access to a link to download six HUP physician created labor podcasts in addition to usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum
o Podcast topics: Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth
* LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey - Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
* EPDS - Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
Labor Podcast
Listening to podcasts.
Topics include:
Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth
Usual Care
2\. Usual care Women randomized to this arm will receive usual care during labor, delivery, and postpartum with the following exceptions:
* LAS-10 and Birth Satisfaction survey Women will be sent these surveys on postpartum day 2 via method they indicated they desire (either email or text message)
* EPDS Women will receive this survey on postpartum day 7 via method they desire
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Labor Podcast
Listening to podcasts.
Topics include:
Labor Anesthesia, Induction of Labor, Second Stage of Labor, Reasons for Cesarean Section, Postpartum Recovery, Complications of Labor and Birth
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Singleton pregnancy
* English-speaking
* Age 18-50
* Own a smart phone or device capable of downloading podcasts
* Reached at least 36w0d of gestation
* Willing and able to sign consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Complication in pregnancy including:
* Placenta accrete spectrum
* Vasa previa
* Intrauterine fetal demise
* Known major fetal anomaly
* Delivery planned at location other than the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fei Cai, MD
Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sindhu Srinivas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee SC, Huang H, Minard CG, Schackman J, Rajagopalan S. The use of podcast videos for airway skills. Clin Teach. 2019 Dec;16(6):585-588. doi: 10.1111/tct.12984. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
Cai F, Burns RN, Kelly B, Hampton BS. CREOGs Over Coffee: Feasibility of an Ob-Gyn Medical Education Podcast by Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Jun;12(3):340-343. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00644.1.
Young B, Pouw A, Redfern A, Cai F, Chow J. Eyes for Ears-A Medical Education Podcast Feasibility Study. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):342-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.041. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Malecki SL, Quinn KL, Zilbert N, Razak F, Ginsburg S, Verma AA, Melvin L. Understanding the Use and Perceived Impact of a Medical Podcast: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Sep 19;5(2):e12901. doi: 10.2196/12901.
Chin A, Helman A, Chan TM. Podcast Use in Undergraduate Medical Education. Cureus. 2017 Dec 9;9(12):e1930. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1930.
Cai F, McCabe M, Srinivas SK. A randomized trial assessing the impact of educational podcasts on personal control and satisfaction during childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5):592.e1-592.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
848622
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.