Drug Concentration and Volume on Adequate Labor Analgesia With PIEB

NCT ID: NCT03553576

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-21

Study Completion Date

2023-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neuraxial labor analgesia is performed by the administration of a local anesthetic/opioid mixture in the epidural space. The delivery method is a combination of continuous infusion, provider-administered boluses and patient-administered boluses (patient controlled epidural analgesia \[PCEA\]) via epidural catheter. The anesthetic solution administered through the lumbar epidural catheter must spread cephalad in the epidural space to reach the T10 nerve roots and spinal cord, and must spread caudad to reach the caudal nerve roots in the epidural space.

Epidural infusion pumps capable of delivering PIEB of local anesthetic with PCEA have become commercially available and many studies have attempted to assess the optimal parameter settings (including volume of programmed bolus, bolus interval, rate of bolus administration) to provide superior labor analgesia.

Traditionally higher concentration local anesthetic solutions have been associated with increased motor blockade leading to a higher incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. Several local anesthetic solutions with varying drug concentrations are available for labor analgesia and are used clinically in the United States. We plan to perform a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to test the hypothesis that patients whose labor analgesia is maintained using PIEB with low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of a higher local anesthetic concentration solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) will require less supplemental analgesia (manual provider re-doses) than patients whose PIEB is delivered with a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower density local anesthetic solution (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between bolus volume and concentration of local anesthetic during maintenance of labor analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia.

The hypothesis of this study is: patients whose labor analgesia is maintained using PIEB with low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of higher local anesthetic concentration solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) will have a longer duration of adequate analgesia (time to first manual re-dose request) than patients whose PIEB is delivered with a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower concentration local anesthetic solution (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Anesthesia Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two group randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The participant and outcomes assessor will be blinded to the assigned randomization.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low volume bolus

6.25 mL administration at 250 ml per hour of a greater density solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low volume bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of a low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of greater density solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.

High volume bolus

10 mL administration of a lower density local anesthetic (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High volume bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower density local anesthetic (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low volume bolus

Administration of a low-volume bolus (6.25 mL) of greater density solution (0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.

Intervention Type DRUG

High volume bolus

Administration of a high-volume bolus (10 mL) of lower density local anesthetic (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2.0 mcg/mL) at 250 mL per hour given by CADD pump.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years and above
* Nulliparous parturients
* Present to the labor and delivery unit for an induction of labor or who are in spontaneous labor
* Request neuraxial labor analgesia at ≤5 cm cervical dilation

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are not eligible to receive a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique with 25 mcg of intrathecal fentanyl
* Non-English speaking
* Failed initiation of CSE analgesia (VAS pain score \>10 15 minutes after intrathecal dose)
* Need to have the epidural catheter replaced during labor
* Who deliver within 90 minutes of initiation of labor analgesia
* Require re-dose within 90 minutes of initiation of labor analgesia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Feyce M. Peralta, MD, MS

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Feyce Peralta, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prentice Women's Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):904-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16492849 (View on PubMed)

Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Oct;14(4):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16154735 (View on PubMed)

Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):581-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03018402.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15197122 (View on PubMed)

Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):534. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00063. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10439786 (View on PubMed)

Hogan Q. Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):150-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29748.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11915061 (View on PubMed)

Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001 Jul 7;358(9275):19-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05251-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11454372 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00206113

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA
NCT02278601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3
Epidural Analgesia During Labour
NCT03133091 COMPLETED PHASE3