Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2018-05-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drug Concentration and Volume on Adequate Labor Analgesia With PIEB
NCT03553576
PIEB-PCEA Versus CEI-PCEA for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous
NCT01856166
Comparison of PIEB vs CEI for Labor Analgesia
NCT02949271
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. (PCEA-IMG)
NCT02563821
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between PIEB and CEI for Labour Epidural Analgesia
NCT06889285
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups. Either group I or II in Study Part A and group III or IV in Study Part B in a double-blinded design. Each study part will run in parallel and independently.
Each group will have a varying concentration of bupivicaine infusion; continuous or intermittent bolus administration. In addition each group will have continuous or intermittent bolus administration of sufentanil. These concentrations and forms of administration will be blinded to both the patient and study administrator.
Each epidural infusion concentration and continuous or bolus administration will be determined to be a success or failure based on analgesic scores. The investigators' primary outcome will be the minimal local anesthetic concentration of the final participants in each respective group upon study completion.
DATA SAFETY MONITORING PLAN will follow standard of clinical care. Any adverse events will be reported to the PI and necessary adjustments to the protocol will be immediately instituted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Part A Group 1
CEI bupivacaine and CEI sufentanil
Bupivacaine
Continuous or bolus administration
Sufentanil
Continuous or bolus administration
Part A Group 2
PIEB bupivacaine and PIEB sufentanil
Bupivacaine
Continuous or bolus administration
Sufentanil
Continuous or bolus administration
Part B Group 3
CEI bupivacaine and PIEB sufentanil
Bupivacaine
Continuous or bolus administration
Sufentanil
Continuous or bolus administration
Part B Group 4
PIEB bupivacaine and CEI sufentanil
Bupivacaine
Continuous or bolus administration
Sufentanil
Continuous or bolus administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine
Continuous or bolus administration
Sufentanil
Continuous or bolus administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brendan Carvalho
Chief, Division of Obstetric Anesthesia Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, MDCH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
Ginosar Y, Columb MO, Cohen SE, Mirikatani E, Tingle MS, Ratner EF, Angst MS, Riley ET. The site of action of epidural fentanyl infusions in the presence of local anesthetics: a minimum local analgesic concentration infusion study in nulliparous labor. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1439-1445. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081792.84877.A2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
34734
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.