PIEB vs CEI for Labor Analgesia: An MLAC Study

NCT ID: NCT02573597

Last Updated: 2022-10-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Utilizing a 'minimal local analgesic concentration (MLAC) study' design to first determine the relative potency of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) compared to Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI) and secondly to determine the mechanism to explain the potential PIEB efficacy advantage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pregnant women who present to Labor and Delivery for an anticipated vaginal delivery will be identified as potential participants based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and their desire for labor epidural analgesia. Once identified, interested candidates will be fully informed of the study procedures, have all questions answered, and informed consent obtained. Pregnant participants will receive a labor epidural upon the patient's request and dosed per protocol to adequate analgesic level.

Patients will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups. Either group I or II in Study Part A and group III or IV in Study Part B in a double-blinded design. Each study part will run in parallel and independently.

Each group will have a varying concentration of bupivicaine infusion; continuous or intermittent bolus administration. In addition each group will have continuous or intermittent bolus administration of sufentanil. These concentrations and forms of administration will be blinded to both the patient and study administrator.

Each epidural infusion concentration and continuous or bolus administration will be determined to be a success or failure based on analgesic scores. The investigators' primary outcome will be the minimal local anesthetic concentration of the final participants in each respective group upon study completion.

DATA SAFETY MONITORING PLAN will follow standard of clinical care. Any adverse events will be reported to the PI and necessary adjustments to the protocol will be immediately instituted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Part A Group 1

CEI bupivacaine and CEI sufentanil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Part A Group 2

PIEB bupivacaine and PIEB sufentanil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Part B Group 3

CEI bupivacaine and PIEB sufentanil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Part B Group 4

PIEB bupivacaine and CEI sufentanil

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous or bolus administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

Continuous or bolus administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

Continuous or bolus administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

marcaine sufenta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I \& II, Nulliparous and Multiparous, Spontaneous/Induced/Augmented Labor, Early active labor (cervix \<5 cm (if known)), Pain (VPS) \> 3, 18-45 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* \<37 weeks gestation, H/o Cesarean Section, Multiple Gestation, Pre-eclampsia, Narcotics within 3 hours prior to labor epidural placement, Chronic Pain (as defined by chronic opiate consumption), Women who are participating in another study that will impact protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brendan Carvalho

Chief, Division of Obstetric Anesthesia Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, MDCH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23223119 (View on PubMed)

Ginosar Y, Columb MO, Cohen SE, Mirikatani E, Tingle MS, Ratner EF, Angst MS, Riley ET. The site of action of epidural fentanyl infusions in the presence of local anesthetics: a minimum local analgesic concentration infusion study in nulliparous labor. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1439-1445. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081792.84877.A2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14570662 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

34734

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epidural Analgesia During Labour
NCT03133091 COMPLETED PHASE3