Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. (PCEA-IMG)
NCT ID: NCT02563821
Last Updated: 2019-01-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-05
2018-12-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Purpose : However, the superiority of PIEB compared to CEI has not been investigated for third trimester voluntary termination of pregnancy.
We hypothesized that PIEB administration would result in a better degree of satisfaction of the patients compared with CEI for third trimester legally induced abortion analgesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia
NCT01860521
PIEB-PCEA Versus CEI-PCEA for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous
NCT01856166
PIEB vs CEI for Labor Analgesia: An MLAC Study
NCT02573597
Comparison of PIEB vs CEI for Labor Analgesia
NCT02949271
Study PIEB vs PIEB: the Dose is it Variable According to the Patients
NCT03690271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In France, Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with CEI mode is usually used for voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. But recent studies have shown that PIEB mode as compared to CEI mode increases maternal satisfaction during labour. This may be attributed to a more extensive spread of epidural solution when delivered as a bolus rather than continuous infusion.
Few trials have been interested in investigating the best mode of PCEA for legally induced abortion analgesia.
This study includes women who undergo voluntary third semester termination of pregnancy. Patients are randomized to PIEB or CEI for pain analgesia. In this randomized, double-blind study, the investigators assess the degree of satisfaction of the patients (primary outcome), the incidence of motor block, total drug consumption and adverse events (secondary outcomes) between the two study groups.
The different values are collected during the intervention on a specific paper for each patient and the degree of satisfaction is reported on this paper just before the patient leaves the birth room (approximatively 2 hours after the expulsion).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PCEA-DC
Injection of a 2 mL initial epidural loading dose consisting of a blend (10 mL) of levobupivacaine 20 mg, sufentanil 10 µg to assure the absence of motor block and so exclude intrathecal placement of the epidural catheter.
* Injection of the rest of the loading dose (8mL).
* In this group the pump is programmed to deliver a continuous infusion at 10 mL /h consisting of levobupivacaine 0,573 mg/mL, sufentanil 0,37 µg/mL, clonidine 1,38 µg/ mL. Additional 5 mL patient-activated boluses will be allowed with a lockout interval of 10 minutes.
* If the parturient feels she has inadequate analgesia after having activated the PCEA bolus twice in a thirty minutes period, an additional manual bolus of 6 mL of levobupivacaine 2,5 mg/mL will be administered until the Pain Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) is \< 3/10.
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia
Levobupivacaine
sufentanil
clonidine
epidural catheter
PCEA-BIP
Injection of a 2 mL initial epidural loading dose consisting of a blend (10 mL) of levobupivacaine 20 mg, sufentanil 10 µg to assure the absence of motor block and so exclude intrathecal placement of the epidural catheter.
* Injection of the rest of the loadind dose (8 mL)
* In this group the pump is programmed to deliver automated mandatory boluses of 5 mL consisting of levobupivacaine 0,573 mg/mL, sufentanil 0,37 µg/mL, clonidine 1,38 µg/mL every 30 minutes. Additional 5 mL patient-activated boluses will be allowed with a lockout interval of 10 minutes.
* If the parturient feels she has inadequate analgesia after having activated the PCEA bolus twice in a thirty minutes period, an additional manual bolus of 6 mL of levobupivacaine 2,5 mg/mL will be administered until the Pain Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) is \< 3/10 (0 = no pain and 10 = insufferable pain).
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia
Levobupivacaine
sufentanil
clonidine
epidural catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia
Levobupivacaine
sufentanil
clonidine
epidural catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA 1 or 2 (healthy women)
* pregnancy at third trimester
* willingness of voluntary interrupt the pregnancy
* women affiliated to french health social system
* written informed consent from every patient
Exclusion Criteria
* opioids consumption within the last 24 hours
* patient's unwillingness
* inability to comprehend or comply with the procedure
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Limoges
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrick SENGES, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Limoges
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universiy hospital
Limoges, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
I14032 (PCEA-IMG)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.