PIEB Compared With CEI on Breakthrough Pain in Nulliparous Women

NCT ID: NCT06494280

Last Updated: 2025-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-10

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the impact of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia technique on the incidence of breakthrough pain during labor in nulliparous women compared to continuous epidural infusion.

Nulliparous women will randomly be divided during labor into two groups; study group will receive mix of Bupivacaine and fentanyl once (bolus) every 60 minutes; the control group will receive continuously the same dose during an hour, until delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are several pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during labor. Epidural analgesia is considered the most effective modality for intrapartum pain relief.

Maintenance of epidural analgesia is achieved by different techniques; continuous epidural infusion (CEI), intermittent epidural analgesia (IEA), patient control epidural analgesia (PCEA) and combination between the techniques.

Another technique, the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia (PIBEA). The advantage of this technique is that boluses are given all the time at planned intervals, so laboring women do not depend on the medical staff to receive the bolus when there is a breakthrough pain.

This method has been reported to be associated with less motor block, lower incidence of instrumental vaginal deliveries, and less consumption of anesthetic agents when compared to CEI. There are no conclusive data regarding the use of PIBEA in combination with PCEA compared to CEI and PCEA on the effect of pain relief during labor and birth outcomes. The hypothesis of the current trial is that PIBEA and PCEA will decrease the incidence of breakthrough pain, and probably shorten the second stage of labor, lead to fewer instrumental deliveries and higher women's satisfaction compared to CEI and PCEA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breakthrough Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study group

Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving programmed intermittent 10ml bolus of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl every one hour, until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the study group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl every hour until the completion of labor and suturing of the incision. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour.

If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added.

Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

control group

Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving 10ml\\h continuous infusion of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

continuous epidural infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the control group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl as a continuous infusion per one hour, until the delivery is completed, and laceration is sutured. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour.

If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added.

Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the study group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl every hour until the completion of labor and suturing of the incision. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour.

If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added.

Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

continuous epidural infusion

About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the control group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl as a continuous infusion per one hour, until the delivery is completed, and laceration is sutured. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour.

If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added.

Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bupivacaine + Fentanyl Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparous women
* Term pregnancy
* Singleton
* Vertex presentation
* Latent phase (cervical dilatation \<6 cm)
* Epidural analgesia request
* Visual Analogue Scale score \> 40

Exclusion Criteria

* Estimated fetal weight \> 4 kg
* Intra uterine fetal death
* Drug sensitivity
* Anomalous fetus
* Contraindication for epidural analgesia
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Raed Salim, MD

head of obstetrics and gynecology department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Raed Salim, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Holy Family Hospital

Nazareth, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Raed Salim, MD

Role: CONTACT

+972544986960

Asmaa Masri Esmail, MD

Role: CONTACT

+972544986960

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Raed Salim, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e208-25. 2. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018:5;CD000331. 3. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012:3;CD009234. 4. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013;116:133-44. 5. Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NNA, Leong WL, Oh TT, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Han NR, Chan ES, Sia AT. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD011344. 6. Ferrer LE, Romero DJ, Vasquez OI, Matute EC, Van de Velde M. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:915-22. 7. Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, Hunting J, Habib AS. Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural boluses with continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labor analgesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:426-35. 8. Haidl F, Arne Rosseland L, Rorvik AM, Dahl V. Programmed intermittent boluses vs continuous epidural infusion in labor using an adrenaline containing solution: A randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64:1505-12. 9. Riazanova OV, Alexandrovich YS, Guseva YV, Ioscovich AM. A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019;26:25-30. 10. Fan Y, Hou W, Feng S, Mao P, Wang X, Jiang J, Yuan H, Shen X, Feng S, Li P. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus decreases the incidence of intra-partum fever for labor analgesia in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:1551-7 11. Xu J, Zhou J, Xiao H, Pan S, Liu J, Shang Y, Yao S. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion as the background infusion for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2583. 12. Wang XX, Zhang XL, Zhang ZX, Xin ZQ, Guo HJ, Liu HY, Xiao J, Zhang YL, Yuan SZ. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e28742. 13. Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:432-7. 14. Lin Y, Li Q, Liu J, Yang R, Liu J. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1107-12. 15. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14:305-9. 16. Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:301-6. 17. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, Teoh WH, Sia AT. A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1968-72. 18. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg 2011;113:826-31. 19. Carvalho B, George RB, Cobb B, McKenzie C, Riley ET. Implementation of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia. Anesth Analg 2016;123:965-71 20. Diez-Picazo LD, Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Is breakthrough pain better managed by adding programmed intermittent epidural bolus to a background infusion during labor epidural analgesia? A randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:1097-104. 21. Roofthooft E, Barbé A, Schildermans J, Cromheecke S, Devroe S, Fieuws S, Rex S, Wong CA, Van de Velde M. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus vs. patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintenance of labour analgesia: a two-centre, double-blind, randomised study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1635-42. 22. Sultan P, Murphy C, Halpern S, Carvalho B. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:840-54.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

297\2024 HFH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA
NCT02278601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3