Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms
NCT ID: NCT04927520
Last Updated: 2021-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
360 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-05
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, with the rapid development of embolization technology and materials in the past 20 years, the application of endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms has been more and more widely, especially after several large prospective studies such as ISAT and ISUIA, endovascular embolization has more advantages over craniotomy clipping.Whereas, it is still very popular to adopt craniotomy clipping for middle cerebral artery aneurysms, the main reasons for which are relative superficial location, wider aneurysm neck, smaller parent artery and more branching vessels, etc., which make early endovascular embolization treatment not advantageous. With the maturity of stent-assisted embolization technology in recent years, the use of a new generation of stents, and the improvement of perioperative anti-platelet strategies, endovascular embolization has achieved good results in the treatment of middle artery aneurysms. However, these studies were retrospective, single-center studies, subject to a variety of confounding factors, and the reliability of the results is limited.
Therefore, it will be of great clinical significance to carry out a prospective, multi-center clinical study on the treatment strategy of middle cerebral artery aneurysms.
Patients with unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms who had been diagnosed with at least one imaging (CTA/MRA/DSA)were enrolled. The treatment including endovascular embolization and craniotomy clipping was determined according to routine management in the center. After receiving informed consent from the patients, the safety and effectiveness data were obtained to verify whether endovascular embolization was safe and effective. Through further follow-up and data analysis, protective factors and risk factors for the treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms were investigated. Through well-designed clinical studies, safer and more effective treatment methods can be found, and potential factors leading to perioperative complications can be found, ultimately improving the prognosis of patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preoperative Assessment and Individualized Operation Optimization of Acute Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms
NCT02977520
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Flow-diverter in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
NCT06943729
General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Using Flow Diverter
NCT06416657
Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in China.
NCT03462433
Hemodynamic Analysis for Intracranial Aneurysms Recanalization After Endovascular Treatment
NCT02812108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After researcher training and standardized study of the scheme, the formal trial was started. A team of experts will be selected to form an inspection team, which will initiate visits to each organization and conduct the first inspection visit as soon as possible after screening the first subject. Regular monitoring visits are required until the end of the experiment. All the data were collected according to the electronic medical record (CRF) form, and then the aneurysm data (EDC) was managed according to the CRF form, and the accuracy and rigor of the data were checked in time.
This study establishes a management committee, including clinical experts, evidence-based medicine experts, and CRO clinical study supervisors, who are responsible for project design, task formulation, supervision of project implementation, data analysis and formulation of standards and guidelines.
The central laboratory and imaging interpretation center were established to carry out unified standard central storage for clinical specimens. The unified image and laboratory technology platform can be used for the image examination and post-processing technology in the project. Uniform standard interpretation of imaging data was carried out. A unified, standardized and efficient transmission mechanism for clinical specimens, data and data in each center was established.
Establish a data management committee, set up a network data platform and be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the database, conduct real-time supervision on the quality of the input data, ensure the safety, integrity and accuracy of the data, establish and organize the implementation of the platform or offline dual-channel error correction and reminder mechanism. Set and manage the rights of all project participants on the data platform, monitor and record the data entry, modification and retrieval, set and manage the data publication of the open platform. Contact and consult statistical experts to conduct periodic analysis of data results and generate research reports.
Relying on professional CRO company, in the implementation process for the implementation of the progress and quality of the implementation of random inspection supervision. At the same time, set up a data regular self-check mechanism. Establish a mechanism for regular training and evaluation of research participants. During the research progress, regular project coordination meetings were held to timely coordinate and solve problems in the process of the project.
2. Sample size Sample size was calculated according to a calculation formula (α=0.05, bilateral test, 80% assurance). According to the literature and the data of the center, the rate of MRS\<2 at 3 months was 95% for patients with endovascular interventional, and was 85% for those with craniotomy and clipping. The number of samples needed for each group was calculated by the software PASS15 to be at least 141. Considering that the maximum shedding rate of 20% might occur during the clinical follow-up, 180 cases were needed for each group, and 360 subjects were finally decided to be included in the study.
3. Statistical Methods Statistical analysis of planned primary and secondary study endpoints will be conducted in accordance with the intentionality treatment principle. Subgroup analysis According to the needs of the experiment, the subjects can be divided into different centers, male and female, and different age groups for corresponding subgroup analysis. Methods for processing lost data Statistical analysis did not follow the study protocol population definition and other statistical methods were used to deal with lost data (e.g. multiple interpolation).
4. Ethical approval of clinical research projects The study plan was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The study protocol was designed and implemented in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines. In line with the national ethical behavior requirements, applicable to local laws and regulations, in strict compliance with the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki ethical provisions.
5. Informed Consent Process Improve the relevant examinations, check the inclusion and exclusion criteria of patients, and send the detailed information of the study to patients or their legal clients. If the patients or legal clients agree to participate in the study, they need to sign two copies of informed consent. The original consent form should be kept in the patient's study folder and another copy given to the patient. Patients or legal clients have the right to terminate their participation in the study at any time, and their decision will be recorded in the patient's study record.
6. confidentiality The investigators will take every step to respect the privacy of the participants in the study. Only data that does not contain identifying information will be entered into the central research database to ensure the privacy of participants. In the process of monitoring data quality and study protocol compliance, the data monitor will refer to the medical records of the subject's clinical center and record them on the patient information sheet. In the reporting data and results, all personal information and research center information will be hidden to protect the privacy of participants.
7. Adverse events management Adverse events occurred in the process of adverse events refers to the study of the subjects has a harmful effect on the health of all events. Serious Adverse Event Category: Serious Adverse Event refers to any event that occurred during the course of the study that had a serious adverse effect on the health of the subjects. Include: cause the subject to be hospitalized, prolong the length of the subject's hospital stay, cause the subject to be disabled, cause the subject's neurological or physical dysfunction, cause the subject's offspring to be born with a deformity, endanger the subject's life, the subject's death or other events that have a serious adverse effect on the subject's health. Adverse events reported to process all kinds of adverse events: take timely measures to deal with, and recorded in a report on the case. Serious adverse event (SAE) : take timely measures to deal with, and recorded in a report on the case, the researchers decided to withdrawal or by drugs, immediately report ethics committee, the drug clinical trial institution and the sponsor, 24 hours, report to the national and provincial food and drug administration. SAE is required to report adverse events and proximate errors via the Intra-hospital Network Notification System.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endovascular therapy group
Unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms treated with coil embolization
No interventions assigned to this group
Clipping surgery group
Unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms treated with clipping surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Accept endovascular intervention or middle cerebral artery aneurysm clip craniotomy, regardless of whether there is a clinical symptoms;
* Multiple aneurysms, whether usual treatment, but it requires the treatment time interval to \> 6 months;
* The subjects currently has independent life ability, namely the mRS score 3 points or less;
* The patient or family agreed to sign a consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Fusiform, traumatic, bacterial or dissecting aneurysm;
* Ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm associated with intracranial hematoma;
* Intracranial or other parts of the patients with malignant tumors;
* General condition is bad, is expected to survival time less than 1 year or poor body condition, can't tolerate anesthesia or aneurysm surgery patients;
* Involved with other intracranial aneurysm patients clinical research;
* A hospital surgery clip or endovascular treatment of patients at the same time;
* Refused to follow-up of patients.
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Jinhua Central Hospital
OTHER
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
OTHER
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
OTHER
Taizhou Hospital
OTHER
People's Hospital of Quzhou
OTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-174
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.