General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Using Flow Diverter
NCT ID: NCT06416657
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
188 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms
NCT04927520
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Flow-diverter in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
NCT06943729
Hemodynamic Analysis for Intracranial Aneurysms Recanalization After Endovascular Treatment
NCT02812108
Safety , Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Aneurysm Clipping
NCT06819657
Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in China.
NCT03462433
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Local anesthesia group
Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.
Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia
Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.
Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.
General anesthesia group
Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.
Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia
Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.
Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia
Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.
Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with previously untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) clearly diagnosed by DSA, CTA, or MRA;
3. UIA maximum diameter \<15mm;
4. Baseline mRS score ≤2;
5. UIAs planned for treated with PED;
6. Patients voluntarily participated in this study and signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Those who are allergic to any components of the anesthetic drugs;
3. Severe symptoms associated with the target aneurysm at the time of diagnosis, with mRS score ≥3;
4. Pregnant and lactating female patients;
5. Severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT or AST \>three times the normal upper limit) or severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate \<30 mL/min) before randomisation;
6. Patients with metal implants in the body (e.g., cardiac stents, cardiac prosthetic valves, pacemakers, metal joints, steel plates, non-removable metal dentures, etc.);
7. Patients known to suffer from dementia or psychiatric diseases and claustrophobia can not complete the magnetic resonance examination;
8. Patients with other serious diseases combined at the time of diagnosis with an expected survival time of less than 1 year;
9. Patients who are participating in clinical trials of other drugs or devices;
10. Other conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, exist that are unsuitable for enrollment.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
OTHER
Peking University International Hospital
OTHER
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
OTHER
The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
UNKNOWN
Guangxi Hospital Division of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
UNKNOWN
The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
UNKNOWN
The Second Artillery General Hospital
OTHER
Ming Lv
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ming Lv
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kang H, Zhou Y, Luo B, Lv N, Zhang H, Li T, Song D, Zhao Y, Guan S, Maimaitili A, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X, Liu J. Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large Chinese Cohort: Complication Risk Factor Analysis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Apr;18(2):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Rangel-Castilla L, Cress MC, Munich SA, Sonig A, Krishna C, Gu EY, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Feasibility, Safety, and Periprocedural Complications of Pipeline Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Under Conscious Sedation: University at Buffalo Neurosurgery Experience. Neurosurgery. 2015 Sep;11 Suppl 3:426-30. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000864.
Griessenauer CJ, Shallwani H, Adeeb N, Gupta R, Rangel-Castilla L, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Boone MD, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS. Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms with Flow Diversion: A Matched Cohort Study. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.111. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Simonsen CZ, Sorensen LH, Juul N, Johnsen SP, Yoo AJ, Andersen G, Rasmussen M. Anesthetic strategy during endovascular therapy: General anesthesia or conscious sedation? (GOLIATH - General or Local Anesthesia in Intra Arterial Therapy) A single-center randomized trial. Int J Stroke. 2016 Dec;11(9):1045-1052. doi: 10.1177/1747493016660103. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Kilic Y, Bas SS, Aykac O, Ozdemir AO. Nonoperating Room Anesthesia for Interventional Neuroangiographic Procedures: Outcomes of 105 Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104495. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104495. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery. 2012 Aug;71(2):E509-13; discussion E513. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8.
Park MS, Albuquerque FC, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Abla AA, McDougall CG. Critical assessment of complications associated with use of the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Sep;7(9):652-9. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011265. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Chalouhi N, Chitale R, Starke RM, Jabbour P, Tjoumakaris S, Dumont AS, Rosenwasser RH, Gonzalez LF. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Jan;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010612. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, Jovin TG, Levy EI, Liebeskind DS, Yoo AJ, Hsu DP, Rymer MM, Tayal AH, Zaidat OO, Natarajan SK, Nogueira RG, Nanda A, Tian M, Hao Q, Kalia JS, Nguyen TN, Chen M, Gupta R. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1175-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574129. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
McDonald JS, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Nov;7(11):789-94. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011373. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
Rajbhandari S, Matsukawa H, Uchida K, Shirakawa M, Yoshimura S. Clinical Results of Flow Diverter Treatments for Cerebral Aneurysms under Local Anesthesia. Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 13;12(8):1076. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081076.
Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, Nelson PK, Siddiqui A, Jabbour P, Pereira VM, Szikora Istvan I, Zaidat OO, Bettegowda C, Colby GP, Mokin M, Schirmer C, Hellinger FR, Given Ii C, Krings T, Taussky P, Toth G, Fraser JF, Chen M, Priest R, Kan P, Fiorella D, Frei D, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Diaz O, Malek AM, Cawley CM, Puri AS. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):62-66. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Luo B, Kang H, Zhang H, Li T, Liu J, Song D, Zhao Y, Guan S, Maimaitili A, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X. Pipeline Embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Nov 2;13:1756286420967828. doi: 10.1177/1756286420967828. eCollection 2020.
Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, Aggour M, Piotin M, Biondi A, Barreau X, Mounayer C, Papagiannaki C, Lejeune JP, Gauvrit JY, Derelle AL, Chabert E, Costalat V. SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):184-189. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014261. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, Kallmes DF, Shapiro M, Moran CJ, Levy EI, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Siddiqui AH, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Saatci I, Cekirge SH, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Nelson PK. Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw014.
Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Jabbour P, Lopes D, Lylyk P, McDougall CG, Siddiqui A. Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):775-780. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6.
van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):306-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6.
Ujiie H, Sato K, Onda H, Oikawa A, Kagawa M, Takakura K, Kobayashi N. Clinical analysis of incidentally discovered unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 1993 Dec;24(12):1850-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1850.
Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):626-36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0.
Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):928-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052760. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
dragontiger
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.