General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Using Flow Diverter

NCT ID: NCT06416657

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

188 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) in the population is about 2%-7%, and once it ruptures and bleeds, the rate of disability and death is extremely high, with 10%-15% of patients dying suddenly before they can seek medical attention, 35% of first-time bleeders, and 60%-80% of second-time bleeders. Survivors are often disabled. Therefore, there is a broad consensus that UIA with surgical indication should be aggressively intervened. The efficacy and safety of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of UIA has been confirmed by many large clinical trials. Currently, FD placement for UIA is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in most centers, however, some studies have observed that FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) is not as effective as FD placement under general anesthesia and have demonstrated the feasibility of FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) with high technical success rates and low perioperative complication rates and mortality. However, the retrospective design and relatively limited sample size of the above studies may introduce significant bias and affect the confidence of the conclusions. Therefore, the present trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial with the aim of comparing the safety and efficacy of GA and LA in UIA patients undergoing FD placement. The results of this study will help inform future multicenter trials to validate the impact of anesthesia choice on the safety and efficacy in UIA patients undergoing FD placement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Aneurysm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Researchers responsible for outcome assessment are unaware of the allocation of anesthesia modalities, but anesthesiologists and neurosurgeons are aware of the allocation of anesthesia modalities because they need to be involved in the safe administration of general or local anesthesia and related medical care.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local anesthesia group

Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.

Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.

General anesthesia group

Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.

Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Different anesthesia methods, namely local anesthesia and general anesthesia

Patients in the local anesthesia group received only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site without anesthesia drugs such as conscious sedation.

Patients in the general anesthesia group received not only local anesthesia at the femoral artery puncture site, but also fast-induction anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion using isoproterenol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxants.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18 years old and ≤80 years old, gender is not limited;
2. Patients with previously untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) clearly diagnosed by DSA, CTA, or MRA;
3. UIA maximum diameter \<15mm;
4. Baseline mRS score ≤2;
5. UIAs planned for treated with PED;
6. Patients voluntarily participated in this study and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The aneurysms are located distal to the anterior cerebral artery (including the anterior communicating artery), distal to the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery, and distal to the basilar artery;
2. Those who are allergic to any components of the anesthetic drugs;
3. Severe symptoms associated with the target aneurysm at the time of diagnosis, with mRS score ≥3;
4. Pregnant and lactating female patients;
5. Severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT or AST \>three times the normal upper limit) or severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate \<30 mL/min) before randomisation;
6. Patients with metal implants in the body (e.g., cardiac stents, cardiac prosthetic valves, pacemakers, metal joints, steel plates, non-removable metal dentures, etc.);
7. Patients known to suffer from dementia or psychiatric diseases and claustrophobia can not complete the magnetic resonance examination;
8. Patients with other serious diseases combined at the time of diagnosis with an expected survival time of less than 1 year;
9. Patients who are participating in clinical trials of other drugs or devices;
10. Other conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, exist that are unsuitable for enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University International Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Anzhen Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangxi Hospital Division of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Artillery General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ming Lv

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Lv

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Linggen Dong, MD

Role: CONTACT

18844738529

Ming Lv, Ph D.

Role: CONTACT

13701376177

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ming Lv, MD,PhD

Role: primary

13701376177

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kang H, Zhou Y, Luo B, Lv N, Zhang H, Li T, Song D, Zhao Y, Guan S, Maimaitili A, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X, Liu J. Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large Chinese Cohort: Complication Risk Factor Analysis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Apr;18(2):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33447904 (View on PubMed)

Rangel-Castilla L, Cress MC, Munich SA, Sonig A, Krishna C, Gu EY, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Feasibility, Safety, and Periprocedural Complications of Pipeline Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Under Conscious Sedation: University at Buffalo Neurosurgery Experience. Neurosurgery. 2015 Sep;11 Suppl 3:426-30. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000864.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26284351 (View on PubMed)

Griessenauer CJ, Shallwani H, Adeeb N, Gupta R, Rangel-Castilla L, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Boone MD, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS. Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms with Flow Diversion: A Matched Cohort Study. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.111. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28279774 (View on PubMed)

Simonsen CZ, Sorensen LH, Juul N, Johnsen SP, Yoo AJ, Andersen G, Rasmussen M. Anesthetic strategy during endovascular therapy: General anesthesia or conscious sedation? (GOLIATH - General or Local Anesthesia in Intra Arterial Therapy) A single-center randomized trial. Int J Stroke. 2016 Dec;11(9):1045-1052. doi: 10.1177/1747493016660103. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27405859 (View on PubMed)

Kilic Y, Bas SS, Aykac O, Ozdemir AO. Nonoperating Room Anesthesia for Interventional Neuroangiographic Procedures: Outcomes of 105 Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104495. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104495. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31806453 (View on PubMed)

Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery. 2012 Aug;71(2):E509-13; discussion E513. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22710418 (View on PubMed)

Park MS, Albuquerque FC, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Abla AA, McDougall CG. Critical assessment of complications associated with use of the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Sep;7(9):652-9. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011265. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24968879 (View on PubMed)

Chalouhi N, Chitale R, Starke RM, Jabbour P, Tjoumakaris S, Dumont AS, Rosenwasser RH, Gonzalez LF. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Jan;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010612. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23345630 (View on PubMed)

Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, Jovin TG, Levy EI, Liebeskind DS, Yoo AJ, Hsu DP, Rymer MM, Tayal AH, Zaidat OO, Natarajan SK, Nogueira RG, Nanda A, Tian M, Hao Q, Kalia JS, Nguyen TN, Chen M, Gupta R. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1175-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574129. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20395617 (View on PubMed)

McDonald JS, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Nov;7(11):789-94. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011373. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25261440 (View on PubMed)

Rajbhandari S, Matsukawa H, Uchida K, Shirakawa M, Yoshimura S. Clinical Results of Flow Diverter Treatments for Cerebral Aneurysms under Local Anesthesia. Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 13;12(8):1076. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081076.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36009139 (View on PubMed)

Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, Nelson PK, Siddiqui A, Jabbour P, Pereira VM, Szikora Istvan I, Zaidat OO, Bettegowda C, Colby GP, Mokin M, Schirmer C, Hellinger FR, Given Ii C, Krings T, Taussky P, Toth G, Fraser JF, Chen M, Priest R, Kan P, Fiorella D, Frei D, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Diaz O, Malek AM, Cawley CM, Puri AS. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):62-66. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31308197 (View on PubMed)

Luo B, Kang H, Zhang H, Li T, Liu J, Song D, Zhao Y, Guan S, Maimaitili A, Wang Y, Feng W, Wang Y, Wan J, Mao G, Shi H, Yang X. Pipeline Embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Nov 2;13:1756286420967828. doi: 10.1177/1756286420967828. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33224273 (View on PubMed)

Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, Aggour M, Piotin M, Biondi A, Barreau X, Mounayer C, Papagiannaki C, Lejeune JP, Gauvrit JY, Derelle AL, Chabert E, Costalat V. SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):184-189. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014261. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30297539 (View on PubMed)

Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, Kallmes DF, Shapiro M, Moran CJ, Levy EI, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Siddiqui AH, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Saatci I, Cekirge SH, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Nelson PK. Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28362885 (View on PubMed)

Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Jabbour P, Lopes D, Lylyk P, McDougall CG, Siddiqui A. Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):775-780. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27791519 (View on PubMed)

Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12414200 (View on PubMed)

van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):306-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17258671 (View on PubMed)

Ujiie H, Sato K, Onda H, Oikawa A, Kagawa M, Takakura K, Kobayashi N. Clinical analysis of incidentally discovered unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 1993 Dec;24(12):1850-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1850.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8248967 (View on PubMed)

Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):626-36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21641282 (View on PubMed)

Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):928-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052760. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16943405 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dragontiger

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.