tDCS and Cognitive Training in Active Duty Service Members With Mild TBI: A Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT04925453

Last Updated: 2025-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-19

Study Completion Date

2025-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed study will evaluate a new approach to cognitive rehabilitation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) using a brain stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, we will investigate how tDCS combined with cognitive training improves deficits to attention and working memory in Active Duty Service Members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measures of attention-related brain activity, neurocognitive assessments, and self-reported clinical outcomes will be used to determine effects of tDCS vs. sham tDCS when paired with a cognitive training intervention. By doing this study, we hope to find a reliable, noninvasive, and efficient method of treating mild TBI cognitive symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives: The proposed study will evaluate a new approach to cognitive rehabilitation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) using a brain stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, we will investigate how tDCS combined with cognitive training improves deficits to attention and working memory in Active Duty Service Members with a history of mTBI. Measures of attention-related brain activity, neurocognitive assessments, and self-reported clinical outcomes will be used to determine effects of tDCS vs. sham tDCS when paired with a cognitive training intervention. By doing this study, we hope to find a reliable, noninvasive, and efficient method of treating mild TBI cognitive symptoms.

Research Plan and Methods: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo (sham) controlled pilot study. We will recruit 60 Active Duty Service Members who are receiving outpatient services at Naval Medical Center San Diego, with a history of mTBI and reported neurocognitive symptoms related to attention, working memory, and related cognitive processes. Intake will involve a full pre-assessment of symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and an optional MRI scan. Participants will be randomized to either active or sham tDCS. Training/tDCS sessions will occur daily over five consecutive days. Random permuted blocks will be used to ensure exactly equal treatment numbers at certain equally spaced points in the sequence of patient assignment. Post-intervention assessment will include another assessment of symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and an optional MRI scan. Participants will complete assessments of symptoms and neurocognitive performance six-weeks following the post-intervention assessment.

Clinical Relevance to TBICoE/Navy Medicine: Aspects of this study will provide insight into a major research gap highlighted in the mission of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, specifically in identifying/ developing innovative treatments/interventions which promote patient recovery and/or mitigate symptoms after mTBI. Novel, well-tolerated, neuroplasticity-based interventions that can improve attention, concentration, and working memory by targeting the underlying neural dysfunction are needed to improve outcomes and quality of life for Active Duty Service Members affected by neurocognitive weakness and dysfunction following mTBI. If tDCS proves successful in reducing TBI-related symptoms, improving cognition, or enhancing functional recovery, this non-invasive intervention could be implemented within various DoD and VA settings, enhancing recovery, improving quality of life, and bolstering occupational performance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Concussion Brain Trauma Attention Concentration Difficulty Brain Injuries Brain Injuries, Traumatic Neurocognitive Dysfunction Attention Impaired Memory Impairment Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

military health brain stimulation cognitive training cognitive rehabilitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo (sham) controlled pilot study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
The tDCS unit software has a double-blind selection, blinding all study members, care providers, and participants until blinds are broken.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active tDCS

Based on previous studies targeting working memory, focality of current delivery, and comfort and tolerance levels, (Paulo S. Boggio et al., 2006; Hill et al., 2016; Hoy et al., 2013; Teo, Hoy, Daskalakis, \& Fitzgerald, 2011), we will use a 2 mA current administered via two circular carbon rubber core electrodes in saline-soaked surface sponges (25 cm2), placed in a neoprene headcap with marked locations based on the 10-10 EEG system. The anodal stimulating electrode will be at location F3, over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the cathodal electrode at location F4, over right DLPFC. Two reference electrodes, CMS and DRL, will be attached to the EarClip and applied to the earlobe with conductive gel.

Before each training session, the impedance of the electrodes will be checked and verified to be ≤15 KOhm. Additionally, the stimulation will be terminated if the impedance of the electrodes is \> 20 KOhm. The current and impedance will be recorded for every session.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

active tDCS and cognitive training intervention

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6. Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups. Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order. Order of task presentation will be randomized each session. Stimulation sequences will occur in the first 13 minutes (shut off: Minute 13) of the session and the last 13 minutes of the session (turn on: Minute 33). The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects. The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session. At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.

Sham tDCS

For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed at the same positions as for active stimulation (F3 and F4). After an initial ramp-up period of 30 seconds, stimulation fades out over a period of 30 seconds. Additionally, at the end of the sham stimulation period, stimulation will fade in over a period of 30 seconds and then end with a final 30 second ramp-down period. Participants will feel the initial itching sensation associated with tDCS and experience the ramp-down period at the end of the sham stimulation period but will receive no active current during the rest of the sham stimulation period. This method of sham stimulation has been shown to be reliable (Gandiga et al., 2006).

Before each training session, the impedance of the electrodes will be checked and verified to be ≤15 KOhm. Additionally, the stimulation will be terminated if the impedance of the electrodes is \> 20 KOhm. The current and impedance will be recorded for every session.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham tDCS and cognitive training intervention

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6. Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups. Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order. Order of task presentation will be randomized each session. Stimulation sequences will occur in the first and last 13 minutes of the session. For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed at the same positions as for active stimulation, but current will be ramped down immediately after the initial 30s ramp up period. The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects. The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session. At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

active tDCS and cognitive training intervention

Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6. Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups. Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order. Order of task presentation will be randomized each session. Stimulation sequences will occur in the first 13 minutes (shut off: Minute 13) of the session and the last 13 minutes of the session (turn on: Minute 33). The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects. The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session. At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

sham tDCS and cognitive training intervention

Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6. Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups. Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order. Order of task presentation will be randomized each session. Stimulation sequences will occur in the first and last 13 minutes of the session. For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed at the same positions as for active stimulation, but current will be ramped down immediately after the initial 30s ramp up period. The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects. The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session. At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

intervention group active group fake tDCS group placebo group sham group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (1) Have a remote history mild traumatic brain injury as defined by the VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines(The Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group, 2016) that is \>/= 6 months, and report moderate severity neurocognitive symptoms related to attention, concentration, working memory, or memory based on NSI scores and self-report.
* (2) Are between the ages of 18-55.
* (3) Are stable on any medications for at least 2 weeks at the baseline visit (Visit #1).

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) Have a history of seizures or epilepsy.
* (2) Have a history of ECT or cortical energy exposure within the past 12 months, including participation in any other neuromodulation studies.
* (3) Have current stimulant dependence.
* (4) Have a diagnosis of intellectual disability or pervasive developmental disorder (i.e. premorbid IQ less than or equal to 70).
* (5) Have any medical condition or treatment other than mild TBI (e.g. stroke, tumor, HIV, moderate-severe TBI), with significant neurological disorder or insults that, based on the Principal Investigator's judgement, would impact risk.
* (6) Diagnosed with current active psychosis or mania.
* (7) Have metallic cranial plates/screws or implanted device,
* (8) Have eczema on scalp or other scalp lesions or skin disorders that may become irritated by stimulation.
* (9) Pregnant individuals and individuals with ferromagnetic metal in their body that would prohibit them from being safe in the MRI will not be excluded from the overall study, but will be excluded from the optional MRI.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lars Hungerford

Senior Clinical Research Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lars D Hungerford, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Naval Medical Center San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMCSD.2020.0016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id