Remote Stimulation and Training to Advance Recovery From TBI in Seniors
NCT ID: NCT07332299
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-15
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions are:
* Does transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) make cognitive training more effective for improving attention, memory, and decision-making?
* Is this type of home-based program feasible and acceptable for older adults with TBI?
Researchers will compare two groups: one group will receive active tDCS during cognitive training, and the other group will receive sham (placebo) tDCS during cognitive training.
Participants will:
* Complete computer-based cognitive training exercises (BrainHQ) to practice attention, memory, and decision-making.
* Receive either active or sham tDCS during training sessions.
* Complete assessments before and after the program to measure changes in thinking and daily functioning.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
tDCS and Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia
NCT04507815
Combined tDCS and Cognitive Training to Reduce Impulsivity in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT03844607
"Cognitive Rehabilitation With Direct Current Transcranial Stimulation in Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Patients"
NCT06228872
Neuromodulation of Cognition in Older Adults
NCT02137122
Control Network Neuromodulation to Enhance Cognitive Training in Complex Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT05236010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is designed to test a new approach that combines \*\*computer-based cognitive training\*\* with \*\*transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)\*\*, a safe, non-invasive form of brain stimulation. The goal is to determine whether this combined treatment can improve attention, memory, and decision-making in older adults with TBI, and whether the program is practical for participants to complete at home with remote supervision.
About the Interventions
* Cognitive training (BrainHQ): Participants will complete computerized exercises that provide structured practice in skills such as attention, working memory, and decision-making. These exercises adapt to each individual's performance, gradually increasing in difficulty as skills improve.
* tDCS: During some of the training sessions, participants will wear a device with electrodes placed on the scalp. The device delivers a very low level of electrical current (2 milliamps) that helps "tune" brain networks to make them more responsive to training. tDCS is non-invasive, painless for most people, and has been tested safely in thousands of participants in research studies worldwide.
Study Design
This is a randomized controlled trial. All participants will complete the same set of cognitive training exercises, but they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
* Active group: Receives active tDCS during training.
* Sham group: Receives sham (placebo) tDCS during training. Sham stimulation mimics the feeling of tDCS at the start of the session but does not deliver active current.
This design allows researchers to determine whether adding tDCS produces greater improvements than cognitive training alone.
Study Procedures
Participants will:
1. Complete baseline assessments of cognitive function, daily living skills, and quality of life.
2. Take part in multiple sessions of computer-based cognitive training at home, while supervised remotely through secure telehealth connections.
3. Receive either active or sham tDCS during the training sessions.
4. Complete follow-up assessments after the intervention to measure changes in thinking, decision-making, and daily functioning.
Key Questions
The study is designed to answer three main questions:
1. Does tDCS enhance the effects of cognitive training? Specifically, do participants who receive active tDCS show greater gains in attention, memory, and decision-making compared to those who receive sham stimulation?
2. Is the program feasible and acceptable? Can older adults with TBI successfully complete the home-based training and stimulation sessions, and do they find the program easy to use and worthwhile?
3. Do improvements transfer to everyday life? Beyond test scores, does the program help participants function better in their daily lives, maintain independence, and improve quality of life?
Importance of the Study
Older adults with TBI are at particularly high risk for poor outcomes, but they are often underrepresented in research. This study is innovative in several ways:
* It focuses specifically on older adults with TBI, a group that has historically been overlooked in clinical trials.
* It uses a home-based and remotely supervised model, which increases accessibility for people living in rural areas, those with mobility limitations, or those who cannot easily attend clinic visits.
* It builds on strong preliminary evidence from prior studies in Veterans and other populations showing that combining brain stimulation with cognitive training can reduce impulsivity and improve cognitive control.
* It addresses a critical gap in treatment by testing a scalable rehabilitation approach that could be delivered widely if proven effective.
Potential Impact
If successful, this research could provide the foundation for a new, effective treatment option for older adults with TBI. The intervention is low-risk, non-invasive, and can be delivered in the home setting with minimal equipment. It could help participants improve cognitive functioning, maintain independence longer, and enhance quality of life. At a broader level, the study could reduce the burden of TBI-related cognitive decline on families, caregivers, and healthcare systems.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active tDCS with cognitive training
Participants will receive 10 sessions of cognitive training concurrent with transcranial direct current stimulation (45 minutes of cognitive training with tDCS applied for first 20 minutes of session; tDCS: 2mA, 30s ramp up/down, anode at F3, cathode at F4).
Active tDCS and Cognitive Training Intervention
Forty-five minutes of cognitive training concurrent with 2 mAmps of anodal stimulation applied to the left frontal cortex for the first 20 minutes of the session.
Sham tDCS with cognitive training
Participants will receive 10 sessions of cognitive training concurrent with sham transcranial direct current stimulation (45 minutes of cognitive training with sham tDCS: 2mA current will be ramped down immediately after the initial 30s ramp up period and then at 20 minutes ramped up and down as done at the beginning, anode at F3, cathode at F4).
Sham tDCS and Cognitive Training Intervention
Forty-five minutes of cognitive training concurrent with sham tDCS (30 secs ramp up/ramp down of current at beginning and end of session).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active tDCS and Cognitive Training Intervention
Forty-five minutes of cognitive training concurrent with 2 mAmps of anodal stimulation applied to the left frontal cortex for the first 20 minutes of the session.
Sham tDCS and Cognitive Training Intervention
Forty-five minutes of cognitive training concurrent with sham tDCS (30 secs ramp up/ramp down of current at beginning and end of session).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. History of mild TBI (as defined by the DOD/VA criteria used in conjunction with the OSU TBI-ID) sustained at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
3. Self-reported or medically documented attention and/or concentration difficulties.
4. Stable dose of all prescription and non-prescription medications that may impact cognition or brain chemistry (except for PRN medication) for at least 3 weeks prior to the baseline session (Visit 1), in the medical opinion of the principal investigator.
5. Capable and willing to provide voluntary informed consent, in the medical opinion of the principal investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Moderate to severe cognitive impairment with MoCA score (assessed upon enrollment) less than 15.
3. Prior treatment with ECT or neuromodulation in the last 12 months.
4. Current severe alcohol or substance use disorder with evidence of withdrawal or tolerance within the past 6 months, based on psychiatric history and/or a review of available medical records.
5. Psychosis or mania within 30 days of enrollment, as determined by the principal investigator, based on psychiatric history and/or a review of available medical records.
6. Contraindications for tDCS (e.g., metallic cranial plates/screws or implanted device, eczema or skin lesions on scalp near electrode site, etc.).
7. No or limited internet connection in their home.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Center for Veterans Research and Education
OTHER
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Casey Gilmore, PhD
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SCI-TBI-2025-00025
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1893132
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.