"Cognitive Rehabilitation With Direct Current Transcranial Stimulation in Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Patients"
NCT ID: NCT06228872
Last Updated: 2024-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-05
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does daily self-administered tDCS therapy, when combined with computerized cognitive training (CCT), improve cognitive function in TBI patients? Is CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation more effective than CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation in enhancing immediate and one-month post-treatment cognitive function? Does CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation lead to better functionality immediately and one month after treatment compared to CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation? Does CCT+tDCS with anodic stimulation have a positive impact on mood improvement immediately and one month after treatment compared to CCT+tDCS with simulated stimulation? Participants in the study will engage in CCT through a smartphone or tablet application and self-administer tDCS therapy for 20 minutes each day for a duration of one month. The tDCS therapy will involve applying a 2 mA anodic current to the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex (PFDL). Prior to the intervention, patients or their caregivers will receive training on the proper and safe usage of the tDCS device. Cognitive function, mood, and functionality will be evaluated before and after the intervention using appropriate measurement scales.
The outcomes of this clinical trial have the potential to identify an effective and accessible therapeutic approach to enhance cognitive function in individuals with moderate to severe TBI. The combination of tDCS therapy with CCT offers an appealing and feasible treatment strategy for these patients, particularly when conducted in a home setting. The findings from this study will guide future clinical trials in the field of cognitive rehabilitation for TBI patients. Researchers will compare active tDCS with sham tDCS to determine if there are differences in the primary outcomes mentioned.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Computer-based Training for the Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation
NCT03382626
Combined tDCS and Cognitive Training to Reduce Impulsivity in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT03844607
Remote Stimulation and Training to Advance Recovery From TBI in Seniors
NCT07332299
Combined tDCS and Cognitive Training in Alzheimer's
NCT06861231
Analysis of TCLT in TBI Patients: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02393079
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methodology: A prospective, controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial is proposed. The intervention will consist of (i) CCT delivered through a smartphone or tablet application and (ii) the application of 2 mA tDCS therapy (20 minutes of anodic current for the experimental group and 60 seconds for the control group) to the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex (PFDL) daily for one month, self-administered by the patient. Prior to the intervention, a training session will be conducted to instruct the patient (or caregiver) on the correct and safe use of the device. The primary outcomes will be cognitive function, mood, and functionality, measured before and after the intervention using appropriate scales.
Discussion: The results of this clinical trial could contribute to the identification of an effective and accessible therapeutic method to improve cognitive function in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. The combination of tDCS therapy with CCT may offer an attractive and feasible therapeutic strategy for these patients, particularly when performed at home. The findings of this study may be useful in guiding future clinical trials in the field of cognitive rehabilitation in TBI patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Participant: They will be unaware of receiving active tDCS therapy or sham intervention. A remote-controlled mobile app will facilitate this.
Investigator: They will be masked, not knowing the assigned interventions. This minimizes bias in data collection and analysis.
Outcomes Assessor: They will be masked to assigned interventions, ensuring objective and unbiased outcome assessment.
Implementing masking ensures that participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors remain unaware of the intervention received, maintaining trial integrity and validity.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
Participants will receive Computerized Cognitive Training and anodal tDCS daily for one month. Stimulation will consist of 20 min of anodal 2mA tDCS stimulation over the DLPFC, followed by 15 min of computerized cognitive training.
Cognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus Anodic transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Computerized Cognitive Training (15 min) + Anodal tDCS over DLPFC (20 min) daily for 1 month
Control Group
Participants will receive Computerized Cognitive Training and sham tDCS daily for one month. Sham stimulation will consist of 60 seconds of anodal 2mA tDCS stimulation over the DLPFC, followed by 19 mins of no current delivery. The same 15 min of computerized cognitive training will be provided after the end of the Sham Stimulation.
Cognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Computerized Cognitive Training (15 min) + Sham tDCS over DLPFC (20 min) daily for 1 month
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus Anodic transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Computerized Cognitive Training (15 min) + Anodal tDCS over DLPFC (20 min) daily for 1 month
Cognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Computerized Cognitive Training (15 min) + Sham tDCS over DLPFC (20 min) daily for 1 month
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) according to classification 58 (see Table 3) with a duration of 6 to 12 months.
* Minimum of 8 years of education (completed basic education with literacy skills).
* Meeting diagnostic criteria (see Table 3) for mild or major cognitive impairment according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).
* Capacity to make decisions and understand relevant information regarding participation in a clinical trial, assessed using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) 60.
* Inclusion of patients with chronic TBI (defined for this study as more than 6 months of duration) based on the proposed mechanism of chronic TBI involving decreased cerebral neuroplasticity, leading to long-term cognitive dysfunction and functional limitations 62. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has shown effectiveness in enhancing neuroplasticity in various neurological and psychiatric conditions 63.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of epileptic seizures.
* Pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders.
* Presence of metallic objects in the body such as aneurysm implants, hemostatic clips, implanted electrodes, and electrical devices like pacemakers.
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mutual de Seguridad Hospital Clinico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose M Matamala Capponi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associated Professor of the University of Chile
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Mutual de Seguridad
Santiago, Metropolitan Region, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Deidda G, Bozarth IF, Cancedda L. Modulation of GABAergic transmission in development and neurodevelopmental disorders: investigating physiology and pathology to gain therapeutic perspectives. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 May 22;8:119. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00119. eCollection 2014.
Fernandez E, Bringas ML, Salazar S, Rodriguez D, Garcia ME, Torres M. Clinical impact of RehaCom software for cognitive rehabilitation of patients with acquired brain injury. MEDICC Rev. 2012 Oct;14(4):32-5. doi: 10.37757/MR2012V14.N4.8.
Kang EK, Kim DY, Paik NJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex improves attention in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Apr;44(4):346-50. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0947.
Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.
Dikmen S, Machamer J, Fann JR, Temkin NR. Rates of symptom reporting following traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 May;16(3):401-11. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000196. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Jaeggi SM, Seewer R, Nirkko AC, Eckstein D, Schroth G, Groner R, Gutbrod K. Does excessive memory load attenuate activation in the prefrontal cortex? Load-dependent processing in single and dual tasks: functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):210-25. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00098-3.
Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Mar 17;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-8.
Lesniak M, Polanowska K, Seniow J, Czlonkowska A. Effects of repeated anodal tDCS coupled with cognitive training for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):E20-9. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318292a4c2.
Sozda CN, Muir JJ, Springer US, Partovi D, Cole MA. Differential learning and memory performance in OEF/OIF veterans for verbal and visual material. Neuropsychology. 2014 May;28(3):347-352. doi: 10.1037/neu0000043. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
Stagg CJ, Best JG, Stephenson MC, O'Shea J, Wylezinska M, Kincses ZT, Morris PG, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 22;29(16):5202-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-08.2009.
Jak AJ, Seelye AM, Jurick SM. Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013 Mar;23(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040588. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
Russo C, Souza Carneiro MI, Bolognini N, Fregni F. Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke. Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):215-222. doi: 10.1111/ner.12574. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Ulam F, Shelton C, Richards L, Davis L, Hunter B, Fregni F, Higgins K. Cumulative effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on EEG oscillations and attention/working memory during subacute neurorehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Mar;126(3):486-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Sacco K, Galetto V, Dimitri D, Geda E, Perotti F, Zettin M, Geminiani GC. Concomitant Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Computer-Assisted Training for the Rehabilitation of Attention in Traumatic Brain Injured Patients: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Results. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 31;10:57. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00057. eCollection 2016.
Quinn DK, Upston J, Jones T, Brandt E, Story-Remer J, Fratzke V, Wilson JK, Rieger R, Hunter MA, Gill D, Richardson JD, Campbell R, Clark VP, Yeo RA, Shuttleworth CW, Mayer AR. Cerebral Perfusion Effects of Cognitive Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild-Moderate TBI. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 7;11:545174. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.545174. eCollection 2020.
Eilam-Stock T, George A, Charvet LE. Cognitive Telerehabilitation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Cognitive and Emotional Functioning Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):442-453. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa059.
Fawcett J. Molecular control of brain plasticity and repair. Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:501-9. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17534-9.
Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Bernabeu M, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive brain stimulation in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):274-92. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318217df55.
Li S, Zaninotto AL, Neville IS, Paiva WS, Nunn D, Fregni F. Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Jun 30;11:1573-86. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S65816. eCollection 2015.
Capizzi A, Woo J, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Traumatic Brain Injury: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Medical Management. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):213-238. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.001.
McInnes K, Friesen CL, MacKenzie DE, Westwood DA, Boe SG. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 11;12(4):e0174847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174847. eCollection 2017.
Motes MA, Spence JS, Yeatman K, Jones PM, Lutrell M, O'Hair R, Shakal S, DeLaRosa BL, To W, Vanneste S, Kraut MA, Hart J , Jr. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve Verbal Retrieval Deficits in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):170-177. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6331. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Resolution number 340
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.