Implant Placement Using a Newly Designed Single Drill Versus Conventional Sequential Drills

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-12

Study Completion Date

2021-04-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

dental implants are usually placed by sequential set of drills which could increase the time of the surgery and could raise the temperature of the osteotomy preparation so a new drill was designed to place the implants fast and easy way

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Artificial Intelligence Assisted Socket Shield With Computer Guided Implant Placement

NCT06299449

Implant Complication Dental Implant Failed

COMPLETED NA

The Vestibular Socket Therapy : A Novel Concept for Immediate Implant Placement in Defective Fresh Extraction Sites

NCT03987646

Immediate Implants

COMPLETED NA

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol

NCT06307691

Implant Complication

RECRUITING NA

Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density

NCT05512273

Implant Osteotomy

COMPLETED NA

Influence of Abutment Angulation on Implant Failure in Immediately Placed and Restored Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Computer Aided Surgical Guides: RCT

NCT03243695

Immediate Dental Implants

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental implant success is evident nowadays with the predictable functional and aesthetic results obtained . Simplified techniques and approaches are preferred for the convenience of both the patients and operators . Current research is focusing on decreasing the number of instruments used, shortening of the operation time and performing flapless approaches for implant placement whenever possible. This is done to reduce the postoperative complaints, such as pain, swelling and bleeding; thus decreasing the need for analgesics and minimising the occurrence of morbidity .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single drill

one drill to place the implants 3.25mm diameter stainless steel drill was used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

drill

Intervention Type OTHER

single 3.25 mm stainless steel drill

sequential drills

For the control group, four drills (2.2mm, 2.75mm, 3.25mm and 4mm diameter),

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

drill

Intervention Type OTHER

single 3.25 mm stainless steel drill

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

drill

single 3.25 mm stainless steel drill

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* implant recipient sites free from any pathological conditions.
* Patients who were cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious were selected.
* non smoker patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable to undergo minor oral surgical procedures
* patients with a history of drug abuse or catabolic drugs were not included.
* Patients with a history of psychiatric disorder and those with unrealistic expectations about the aesthetic outcome of implant therapy were also excluded.
* Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space, on centric occlusion, to accommodate the available restorative components .
* Uncontrolled diabetic patients
* Patient who had any systemic condition that may contraindicate implant therapy (impaired wound healing - bleeding disorders
* patients who had any habits that might jeopardise the osseointegration process, such as heavy smoking and alcoholism.
* Patients with para-functional habits that produce overload on the implant, such as bruxism and clenching were excluded.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes