Perfetti Method on Upper Extremity Spasticity of Stroke Patient
NCT ID: NCT04869748
Last Updated: 2021-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-15
2019-07-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Perfetti Method in Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients
NCT01374152
Effects of Perfetti's Method on Cognition, Dexterity and Sensory Motor Function of the Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients
NCT05167006
Impact of Muscular Fatigability on Spastic Co-contractions After Stroke Patients
NCT03342820
Muscular Strengthening for Paretic Knee Flexor and Extensor by Conventional Physiotherapy on Chronic Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
NCT00570570
Prognosis and Diagnosis of Spasticity in Acute-post Stroke Patients
NCT05179473
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* After approval by Human Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, stroke patients with spasticity of upper extremity at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodhi Hospital were recruited.
* Participants were assigned to experimental group and control group by researcher using computer randomization.
* Outcome assessor was blinded to the allocations.
* Demographic data including gender, ages, type of stroke, hemiparesis side, time since stroke, duration of upper limb spasticity, Brunnstrom stage of upper extremity, joint proprioception of elbow joint, Barthel index, spasticity impact score, and current treatment (conventional physical therapy, antispastic medication, botulinum toxin/ Phenol injection) were collected. A simplified questionnaire was used to determine spasticity impact score.
* All therapy sessions were conducted by the same PMR residence, who was trained by an experienced occupational therapist for 1 session and further practiced under supervision for 10 sessions.
* The primary outcome was the improvement of the angle of muscle reaction (R1 angle) in Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS).
* The secondary outcomes were the number of participants with improvement of quality of muscle action in MTS ≥1 and the number of participants with improvement of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≥1.
* Sample size was calculated using delta change of R1 angle of MTS in 10 subjects pilot study, with alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.1. The total number of sample size is 7 subjects per group, 14 subjects in total.
* In Experimental group, each participant received a 15-minute session of Perfetti method on affected elbow flexor. Participant was blindfolded, while lying flat in a quiet and comfortable room. Participants were asked to concentrate on the position of their elbows. Protocol has 4 steps of training as shown in Table 1, starting from 2 positions of elbow and ending with 5 positions. After therapist passively moved elbow joint to a position, participant guessed the position of his/her elbow. If the answers were correct consecutively for 10 times, the therapist increased the number of positions according to the protocol.
* In control group, each participant received gentle passive stretching of elbow flexor and maintained in full elbow extension position for 15 minutes.
* For statistical analysis, program SPSS version 21 was used to calculate mean and standard deviation (mean±SD) for continuous variables, and percent and median for categorical variables. Paired T-test and independent T-test were used to compared result in the same group and between groups, respectively. Results were considered significant when p \<0.05. The difference in quality of muscle reaction of MTS and MAS was deemed meaningful if the reduction was ≥ 1 level.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
experimental group
After recruitment, signed inform consent and allocation, researcher collected demographic data of each participant. First outcome assessment was done before session. Participants received a 15-minute session of Perfetti method on affected elbow flexor.Immediate after session, last outcome assessment was collected.
Perfetti method
* Participant was blindfolded, while lying flat in a quiet and comfortable room.
* Participants received a 15-minute session of Perfetti method on affected elbow flexor.
* Participants were asked to concentrate on the position of their elbows.
* Protocol has 4 steps of training starting from 2 positions; full flexion and full extension 3 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 90 degree and full extension 4 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 110-140 degree, elbow flexion 45-60 degree and full extension 5 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 110-140 degree, elbow flexion 90 degree, elbow flexion 45-60 degree and full extension of elbow.
* After therapist passively moved elbow joint to a position, participant guessed the position of his/her elbow. If the answers were correct consecutively for 10 times, the therapist increased the number of positions according to the protocol.
control group
After recruitment, signed inform consent and allocation, researcher collected demographic data of each participant. First outcome assessment was done before session. Participants received a 15-minute session of Passive stretching on affected elbow flexor.Immediate after session, last outcome assessment was collected.
passive stretching
* Participant was blindfolded, while lying flat in a quiet and comfortable room.
* Each participant received gentle passive stretching of elbow flexor and maintained in full elbow extension position for 15 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perfetti method
* Participant was blindfolded, while lying flat in a quiet and comfortable room.
* Participants received a 15-minute session of Perfetti method on affected elbow flexor.
* Participants were asked to concentrate on the position of their elbows.
* Protocol has 4 steps of training starting from 2 positions; full flexion and full extension 3 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 90 degree and full extension 4 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 110-140 degree, elbow flexion 45-60 degree and full extension 5 positions; full flexion, elbow flexion 110-140 degree, elbow flexion 90 degree, elbow flexion 45-60 degree and full extension of elbow.
* After therapist passively moved elbow joint to a position, participant guessed the position of his/her elbow. If the answers were correct consecutively for 10 times, the therapist increased the number of positions according to the protocol.
passive stretching
* Participant was blindfolded, while lying flat in a quiet and comfortable room.
* Each participant received gentle passive stretching of elbow flexor and maintained in full elbow extension position for 15 minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. having spastic elbow flexors MAS ≥ 2
3. full range of motion (ROM) of elbow from 0-150 degree
4. Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) score ≥ 23
5. having had problem from spasticity
6. age ≥ 18 years old
7. given written informed consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
2. previous soft tissue release of involved elbow flexor
3. having wound or inflammation on treatment area
4. unstable medical condition
5. other conditions affecting tone of elbow flexor, e.g. nerve injury
6. not willing to participate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pimchanok Tuakta, MD, PMR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of rehabilitation medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ramathibodi Hospital
Bangkok, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MURA2018/441
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.