Use of Surface Electromyography as a Tools to Predict Upper Extremity Recovery Function After Stroke
NCT ID: NCT06574737
Last Updated: 2024-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-01
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Based on the framework and premises above, the hypothesis is formulated as follows: H0 : surface electromyography parameters cannot predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients H1: surface electromyography parameters can predicts upper extremity motor function recovery in stroke patients
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Mirror Therapy on Lower Extremity Motor Control and Gait in Patients With Stroke
NCT01574079
Muscular Changes in the First 12 Weeks After Stroke.
NCT06320561
Muscular Strengthening for Paretic Knee Flexor and Extensor by Conventional Physiotherapy on Chronic Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
NCT00570570
Comparing Unimanual and Bimanual Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery Post Stroke
NCT02780440
Impact of a Focal Muscle Vibration Protocol in Front of the the Anterior Tibial Muscle in the Subacute Post-stroke Period on Motor Recovery in Hemiplegic Patients.
NCT04737018
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion criteria:
1. Patients who are hospitalized with upper extremity weakness due to stroke on the same side which confirmed with computed tomography scan or structural magnetic resonance imaging, in the acute phase
2. Men and women aged more than 18 years old
3. Willing to participate
Exclusion criteria:
1. Cognitive impairment (MoCA-Ina score less than 26)
2. Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
3. Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
4. Patients with pacemaker
5. Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
6. Diagnosis of other neurological disease or disorders in addition to stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, neuropathy or radiculopathy)
7. Get treated in isolation room
8. Hypersensitivity to gel electrodes
Drop out criteria:
1. Unable to do 2 or more follow up session
2. Withdrawn by themselves
Confounding factor:
1. Stroke location
2. Stroke size
3. Spasticity
4. Rehabilitation program
5. Compliance rehabilitation
6. Stroke risk factor
Sampling Technique The method of sampling based on consecutive samplings, that is, all stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the duration of the study.
Based on the formula above, the minimum sample size for this research is adequate, so the minimum sample size is 30 samples.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Men and women aged more than 18 years old
3. Willing to participate
Exclusion Criteria
2. Impaired consciousness (GCS score less than 15)
3. Unstable medical conditions at time of hospitalization
4. Patients with pacemaker
5. Having other injury or dysfunction in the impaired side of upper extremity that caused restrictions on the range of joint movement and muscle weakness, such as fractures, periarthritis, or moderate-severe pain
6. Diagnosis of other neurological disease or disorders in addition to stroke (e.g., traumatic brain injury, neuropathy or radiculopathy)
7. Get treated in isolation room
8. Hypersensitivity to gel electrodes
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitas Padjadjaran
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Berthy Al Mungiza
Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fan J, Li X, Yu X, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Fang Y, Zong M, Suo C, Man Q, Xiong L. Global Burden, Risk Factor Analysis, and Prediction Study of Ischemic Stroke, 1990-2030. Neurology. 2023 Jul 11;101(2):e137-e150. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207387. Epub 2023 May 17.
Venketasubramanian N, Yudiarto FL, Tugasworo D. Stroke Burden and Stroke Services in Indonesia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2022;12(1):53-57. doi: 10.1159/000524161. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):107-12. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.107.
Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279.
Feldner HA, Papazian C, Peters KM, Creutzfeldt CJ, Steele KM. Clinical Use of Surface Electromyography to Track Acute Upper Extremity Muscle Recovery after Stroke: A Descriptive Case Study of a Single Patient. Appl Syst Innov. 2021 Jun;4(2):32. doi: 10.3390/asi4020032. Epub 2021 May 10.
Steele KM, Papazian C, Feldner HA. Muscle Activity After Stroke: Perspectives on Deploying Surface Electromyography in Acute Care. Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 23;11:576757. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576757. eCollection 2020.
Alt Murphy M, Al-Shallawi A, Sunnerhagen KS, Pandyan A. Early prediction of upper limb functioning after stroke using clinical bedside assessments: a prospective longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26585-1.
Papazian C, Baicoianu NA, Peters KM, Feldner HA, Steele KM. Electromyography Recordings Detect Muscle Activity Before Observable Contractions in Acute Stroke Care. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jun 5;3(3):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100136. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Stinear CM, Smith MC, Byblow WD. Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3314-3322. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025696. Epub 2019 Oct 15. No abstract available.
Manzur-Valdivia H, Alvarez-Ruf J. Surface Electromyography in Clinical Practice. A Perspective From a Developing Country. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 15;11:578829. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.578829. eCollection 2020.
Ueda S, Aoki H, Yasuda Y, Nishiyama A, Hayashi Y, Honaga K, Tanuma A, Takakura T, Kurosu A, Hatori K, Hayashi A, Fujiwara T. The MMT of Elbow Flexion and the AFE Predict Impairment and Disability at 3 Weeks in Patients With Acute Stroke. Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 30;13:831800. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831800. eCollection 2022.
Lv W, Liu K, Zhou P, Huang F, Lu Z. Surface EMG analysis of weakness distribution in upper limb muscles post-stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1135564. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1135564. eCollection 2023.
Raghavan P. Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):599-610. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Li S. Stroke Recovery Is a Journey: Prediction and Potentials of Motor Recovery after a Stroke from a Practical Perspective. Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;13(10):2061. doi: 10.3390/life13102061.
Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Jun 16;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6. eCollection 2020.
Pregnolato G, Rimini D, Baldan F, Maistrello L, Salvalaggio S, Celadon N, Ariano P, Pirri CF, Turolla A. Clinical Features to Predict the Use of a sEMG Wearable Device (REMO(R)) for Hand Motor Training of Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065082.
Salvalaggio S, Boccuni L, Turolla A. Patient's assessment and prediction of recovery after stroke: a roadmap for clinicians. Arch Physiother. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00167-4.
Roman NA, Miclaus RS, Nicolau C, Sechel G. Customized Manual Muscle Testing for Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assessment. Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 28;12(4):457. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040457.
Kostka J, Niwald M, Guligowska A, Kostka T, Miller E. Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke. Brain Behav. 2019 Apr;9(4):e01243. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1243. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Pandian S, Arya KN. Stroke-related motor outcome measures: do they quantify the neurophysiological aspects of upper extremity recovery? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Jul;18(3):412-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
McManus L, De Vito G, Lowery MM. Analysis and Biophysics of Surface EMG for Physiotherapists and Kinesiologists: Toward a Common Language With Rehabilitation Engineers. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 15;11:576729. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576729. eCollection 2020.
Hogrel JY. Clinical applications of surface electromyography in neuromuscular disorders. Neurophysiol Clin. 2005 Jul;35(2-3):59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2005.03.001.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IKFR-202408.01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.