Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-01
2020-10-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. Are there differences in mobility immediately following STS and stepping training with or without using external feedback in ambulatory patients with stroke?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stepping Training Using Feedback in Stroke
NCT02916797
Effects of Multi-direction Stepping and Weight Shifting Exercises in Stroke Patients
NCT05285241
Effectiveness of Paretic Lower Limb Loading During Over-ground Training Among Stroke Survivors
NCT05097391
Development of an Intelligent Balance Training System Providing Weight-bearing Feedback in Stroke Patients
NCT04841161
Effects of Trunk Exercise on Trunk Control and Balance in Persons With Stroke
NCT04434443
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary outcomes were WB ability on the affected limb and WB symmetry. Secondary outcomes were walking speed and balance ability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
WB Training with external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand with external feedback for 10 minute and then, WB during stepping training with external feedback for 10 minutes. After training, subjects will walk overground for 10 minutes.
WB Training with external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand and stepping with external feedback, follow by overground walking.
WB Training without external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand without external feedback for 10 minute and then, WB during stepping training without external feedback for 10 minutes. After training, subjects will walk overground for 10 minutes.
WB Training without external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand and stepping without external feedback, follow by overground walking.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
WB Training with external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand and stepping with external feedback, follow by overground walking.
WB Training without external feedback
WB during sit-to-stand and stepping without external feedback, follow by overground walking.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age at least 40 years to 74 years
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5- 29.9 kg/m\^2
* Ability of independent walking over at least 10 meters with or without a walking device
* Ability to rise from a chair with or without using their arms
* Ability to follow a command used in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Auditory or visual deficits that are unable to be corrected by a hearing aid, glasses or contact lens
* Musculoskeletal pain with a pain scale more than 5 out of 10 on a visual analog scale (VAS)
* Deformity in the limbs or spine that affect ambulatory ability
* Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) more 2 score
* Unstable cardiovascular, orthopedics, musculoskeletal, or neurological disease other than stroke.
40 Years
74 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Khon Kaen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sugalya Amatachaya
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sugalya Amatachaya
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of physical therapy, Faculty of Associated medical sciences, Khon Kaen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Associated Medical Science
Nai Muang, KhonKaen, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boukadida A, Piotte F, Dehail P, Nadeau S. Determinants of sit-to-stand tasks in individuals with hemiparesis post stroke: A review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Jun;58(3):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 23.
Lomaglio MJ, Eng JJ. Muscle strength and weight-bearing symmetry relate to sit-to-stand performance in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture. 2005 Oct;22(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.08.002.
Park GD, Choi JU, Kim YM. The effects of multidirectional stepping training on balance, gait ability, and falls efficacy following stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):82-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.82. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
Tsaklis PV, Grooten WJ, Franzen E. Effects of weight-shift training on balance control and weight distribution in chronic stroke: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):23-31. doi: 10.1310/tsr1901-23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSD60I0015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.