Resistance Training and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT06933147

Last Updated: 2025-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-15

Study Completion Date

2025-04-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study explored two common rehabilitation strategies-Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Resistance Training (RT)-to help stroke survivors improve movement and function in their weaker arm. Stroke can often lead to reduced mobility in one arm, which affects a person's independence and quality of life. This randomized clinical trial involved 64 patients between the ages of 40 to 60 who had experienced a stroke and were in the sub-acute phase of recovery. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received CIMT and the other received RT. The CIMT group had their unaffected arm restrained for 6 hours per day and completed 3 hours of supervised exercises using the affected arm. The RT group participated in structured strength training using weights to target shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles. Both groups were treated five days a week for 12 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers assessed participants using three tools: the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for arm function, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor recovery, and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) for overall well-being. These assessments were conducted at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate and compare the effects of two rehabilitation techniques-Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Resistance Training (RT)-on motor recovery and quality of life in patients recovering from sub-acute stroke. Stroke survivors commonly experience upper limb impairments that hinder their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). Traditional therapy approaches often focus on general mobility, but targeted interventions like CIMT and RT have shown promise in enhancing specific motor functions and promoting neuroplasticity. A total of 64 stroke patients, aged 40-60 years, who had mild to moderate upper limb impairment were included. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group A received CIMT, which involved constraining the unaffected arm for 6 hours daily and performing 3 hours of functional task-oriented training with the affected limb. Group B underwent RT, a progressive strengthening protocol that included concentric contractions of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist using weighted cuffs adjusted according to each patient's one-repetition maximum (1RM). Both groups received standard physiotherapy and were given home exercise programs. Patients were assessed using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) at four intervals: baseline, 4th week, 8th week, and 12th week. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. The study was ethically approved, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. It adhered to the ethical guidelines of the University of Lahore. Patients were assured of confidentiality, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw at any point. No adverse effects were reported from either intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) Group

Participants in this group received Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) for 12 weeks. The unaffected upper limb was constrained for 6 hours per day using a mitt, and patients completed 3-hour daily sessions of task-specific functional training with the affected limb, 5 days per week. Exercises included grasping, stretching, pushing, button pressing, and fine motor tasks designed to improve upper limb function and daily activity performance. A home exercise plan was also provided.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention involved constraining the unaffected upper limb for 6 hours per day and performing 3-hour intermittent daily sessions of functional task practice with the affected limb for 12 weeks, 5 days per week. Exercises included stretching, grasping, dexterity tasks, and functional activities like self-feeding and button pressing. The program used shaping techniques to increase task difficulty and improve motor recovery. A home exercise program was also prescribed for daily practice.

Resistance Training (RT) Group

Participants in this group underwent Resistance Training (RT) focused on the affected upper extremity for 12 weeks. Exercises targeted shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles using weight cuffs (½-1 kg) based on 1RM assessment. Each session included 3 sets of 8 reps for 4 different exercises, 5 days a week. The training started with 50% 1RM intensity for 4 weeks and progressed to 70% over the next 8 weeks. Sessions lasted 60 minutes and included rest intervals. A structured home exercise program was also provided.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resistance Training (RT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention consisted of structured progressive resistance exercises targeting the affected upper limb muscles (shoulder, elbow, wrist) using weight cuffs (½-1 kg). Sessions were 60 minutes/day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks. Intensity progressed from 50% to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) based on individual capacity. Exercises were performed in 3 sets of 8 repetitions for each muscle group, with 2-minute rest intervals. A home program included additional wrist and hand strengthening tasks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)

This intervention involved constraining the unaffected upper limb for 6 hours per day and performing 3-hour intermittent daily sessions of functional task practice with the affected limb for 12 weeks, 5 days per week. Exercises included stretching, grasping, dexterity tasks, and functional activities like self-feeding and button pressing. The program used shaping techniques to increase task difficulty and improve motor recovery. A home exercise program was also prescribed for daily practice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Resistance Training (RT)

This intervention consisted of structured progressive resistance exercises targeting the affected upper limb muscles (shoulder, elbow, wrist) using weight cuffs (½-1 kg). Sessions were 60 minutes/day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks. Intensity progressed from 50% to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) based on individual capacity. Exercises were performed in 3 sets of 8 repetitions for each muscle group, with 2-minute rest intervals. A home program included additional wrist and hand strengthening tasks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient having age between 40-60 years
* Both gender were included
* Patient diagnosed with hemiparesis having grade 1 or 2 using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
* Participant able to sit independently for 60 min
* Patients experiencing functional limitations in upper limb motor function

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants with severe aphasia, severe shoulder pain affecting therapy or any comorbid condition that could limit UE function, visual or hearing impairment
* Uncontrolled pain or spasticity in the affected arm
* History of shoulder instability or major orthopedic surgery in the affected arm
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lahore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hafiza Zoha Musharaf

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital

Lahore, , Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gracies JM, Pradines M, Ghedira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, Gault-Colas C, Audureau E, Hutin E, Baude M, Bayle N; Neurorestore Study Group. Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30871480 (View on PubMed)

Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27447365 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Rec-UOL-/502/08/24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.