Assessment of Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Non-osseous Lateral Ankle Instability in Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT ID: NCT04834479
Last Updated: 2021-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
54 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-04-03
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dynamic Ultrasound in Evaluation of Tendo-ligamentous Ankle Injury
NCT03621150
Changes in Dynamic q Angle in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT06188416
MRI Appearance of Injured Ligament and Tendon of the Ankle in Different Postures
NCT03049423
Bipedal vs. Unipedal Exercises in Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT06244511
Association Between Chronic Ankle Instability and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
NCT04555083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Common diagnostic tools used to identify ankle instability include clinical testing (like Anterior Drawer Test), imaging and arthroscopy. Arthroscopic examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered the two most accurate methods of diagnosing injuries to lateral collateral ligaments. \[7\] In a retrospective study conducted by Joshy et al., in which 24 patients underwent arthroscopy and MRI of the ankle, MRI was found to have both high specificity (100%) and high sensitivity (100%) for ATFL disruption. \[8-10\] Ultrasound has been proven able to detect soft tissue injuries, and has even become the gold standard for the detection of injuries to the patellar and Achilles tendons. \[2, 11\] However, the use of ultrasound and its' ability to accurately diagnose CAI is still under debate.
When imaging the ankle, ultrasound should be able to detect synovial lesions, ligamentous injury, and distinguish soft tissue from osseous impingement.\[8\] Dynamic ultrasound should be also used to discover dislocation of the peroneal tendons, or intra-sheath dislocation, which is indicated by an intact retinaculum with subluxation of the peroneal tendons within the groove.\[11\] Aim of the work: The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the assessment of non-osseous lateral ankle instability in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Patients and Methods:
fifty four patients complaining of acute or chronic lateral ankle instability will be included in this study.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients complaining of acute or chronic lateral ankle instability.
Exclusion criteria:
* Previous ankle surgery
* Interventional intra-articular procedures (previous arthroscope, injections)
* Systemic inflammatory disorders (collagen diseases)
* Diagnosed osseous lesions.
Methods:
All patients will be subjected to:
Thorough history taking and clinical provisional diagnosis. Plain X-ray of the affected ankle in AP and lateral views to exclude any osseous lesions.
Real-time high resolution ultrasonography of the affected ankle joint MRI for the affected ankle joint.
Ultrasound Technique:
The ultrasonographic examination of the ankle begins with the patient in supine position. Longitudinal scanning of the ankle was first performed to get an overall view of the tibio-talar joint and to detect joint effusion. Thereafter, slight inversion of the foot is performed while the patient in the same position to examine the lateral collateral ligaments and peroneal tendons. The Anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) is first examined in oblique transverse plane from the tip of lateral malleolus, antero-medially and slightly downward, till the talus. Then, the Calcaneo Fibular ligament (CFL) is examined in oblique longitudinal plane from the lateral malleolar tip downward and slightly backward to the lateral surface of the calcaneus.
Regarding the peroneal tendons, they are examined from their supra-malleolar musculo-tendinous junction, and then just behind the lateral malleolus till their infra-malleolar course in both longitudinal and transverse planes.
MRI examination All patients will have MRI imaging of the affected ankle(s) on a high field-strength scanners.
Positioning:
Every patient lies supine with the ankle and foot in neutral position and plantar flexion of 20-30 degrees for reducing the "magic angle" artifact. No movement allowed during examination by supporting the ankle using pads.
Protocol:
The patients are examined by different pulse sequences including T1, T2, proton density, gradient echo and STIR. The examinations will be done in different planes.
Our usual protocol of examination is Sagittal T1WIs, Axial T1WIs T2WIs and proton density images, coronal T1WIs as well as Sagittal or coronal STIR.
Other parameters applied include slice thickness ranged from 3 to 5 mm, matrix 256/192 or 512/224, number of excitation 2 to 3 and field of view ranged from 12 to 16 cm, better kept \<14 cm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ankle US and Ankle MRI
Ankle US and Ankle MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Interventional intra-articular procedures (previous arthroscope, injections)
* Systemic inflammatory disorders (collagen diseases)
* Diagnosed osseous lesion
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marina Raafat Fouad
MRFouad
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mariana Raafat
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mariana Raafat Fouad
Asyut, , Egypt
Mariana Raafat Fouad
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wikstrom EA, Hubbard-Turner T, McKeon PO. Understanding and treating lateral ankle sprains and their consequences: a constraints-based approach. Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):385-93. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0043-z.
Radwan A, Bakowski J, Dew S, Greenwald B, Hyde E, Webber N. EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSING CHRONIC LATERAL ANKLE INSTABILITY:A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;11(2):164-74.
Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Bossard DS, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Doherty C, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, Remus A, Verhagen E, Vicenzino BT, Wikstrom EA, Gribble PA. Clinical assessment of acute lateral ankle sprain injuries (ROAST): 2019 consensus statement and recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;52(20):1304-1310. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098885. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
Houston MN, Van Lunen BL, Hoch MC. Health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):758-63. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.54.
van Ochten JM, van Middelkoop M, Meuffels D, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Chronic complaints after ankle sprains: a systematic review on effectiveness of treatments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;44(11):862-71, C1-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5221. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Croy T, Saliba SA, Saliba E, Anderson MW, Hertel J. Differences in lateral ankle laxity measured via stress ultrasonography in individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle sprain copers, and healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jul;42(7):593-600. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3923. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
Polzer H, Kanz KG, Prall WC, Haasters F, Ockert B, Mutschler W, Grote S. Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012 Jan 2;4(1):e5. doi: 10.4081/or.2012.e5. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Joshy S, Abdulkadir U, Chaganti S, Sullivan B, Hariharan K. Accuracy of MRI scan in the diagnosis of ligamentous and chondral pathology in the ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Jun;16(2):78-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
Jung HG, Kim NR, Kim TH, Eom JS, Lee DO. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Stress Radiography in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Jun;38(6):621-626. doi: 10.1177/1071100717693207. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Morvan A, Klouche S, Thes A, Hardy P, Bauer T. Reliability and validity of preoperative MRI for surgical decision making in chronic lateral ankle instability. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 May;28(4):713-719. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2116-4. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17100620
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.