Association Between Chronic Ankle Instability and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
NCT ID: NCT04555083
Last Updated: 2021-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-03
2020-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Flexibility Deficit in Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT04083391
Changes in Dynamic q Angle in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT06188416
Radiological and Clinical Measures as Predictors of Dynamic Postural Control Deficits in Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT07051018
Relationship of Dynamic Knee Valgus With Foot Posture, Pain, and Balance in Chronic Ankle Instability.
NCT07121725
Assessment of Torso Musculature and Hamstring Flexibility in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT06925191
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two-sided confidence interval 95%, power 80%, ratio of controls to cases 1, percent of control exposed 4.5% , odds ratio 32%. The sample size calculations required for this study was 28 participants (14 in each group).
Data distributions was checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test and for equality of variance using Box's test. Box and whiskers plots were used for detecting the outliers. Descriptive statistics calculated for demographic data. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard errors of measurement (SEM) were calculated to estimate the intratester reliability and precision of measurement for the static pelvic rotation
The outcomes of these study were:
1. Association between CAI and SIJD represents through odd's ratio (primary outcome)
2. Pelvic torsion difference between CAI and control Calculated by Mann- Whitney test (secondary outcome)
3. Correlations between pelvic torsion with perceived ankle instability and number of giving way episodes calculated Pearson correlation coefficient(secondary outcome) Effect size analysis was calculated to determine the clinical significant difference. Statistical analysis was conducted using the statistical package for social studies (SPSS) for windows, version 24 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The normative data presented as Mean ± standard deviation (SD) while non-normative data presented as median. Significance was set at p \< 0.05 and total study power was set 80%
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAI group
Case group is CAI group that recruit patients complain of ankle insatiability and giving way mainly
No interventions assigned to this group
control group
control group recruits participants with non injured ankle, matched with case group in gender and dominant limb
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. CAI group has a self-report of a past history of unilateral ankle inversion injury since at least more than 1 year before the study onset
3. Required a period of protected weight bearing and/or immobilization at least one day
4. The patient reported a tendency to give way or repeatedly turn over during functional activity
5. At least 2 giving way episodes during the year before the study onset and/or recurrent ankle sprain
6. Perceived that the ankle was chronically weaker, more painful, and/or less functional than other non-injured ankle or than before first injury.
7. Positive anterior drawer test and /or talar tilt test
Exclusion Criteria
2. Leg length difference more than 0.5 cm
3. History of autoimmune diseases, complains of ankylosing spondylitis and morning stiffness
4. Participation in physical therapy regimen within a year before enrolling in the study
5. Bilateral ankle sprain injury
6. Ankle sprain within 3 months of participation
7. If they had only midline or symmetrical pain above the level of L5 or radicular pain with neurological deficits (sensory or motor deficits)
8. History of spinal surgery, infection, tumors, fracture of the spine, pelvis or lower extremities within 2 years before enrolling in the study.
9. Hospitalization for severe trauma or car accident
10. Pregnant women
11. Any neurological and orthopedics diseases could affect the conditions
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dalia Mohammad Mohammad Mosaad
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dalia mossad, professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
professor at faculty of physical therapy Cairo university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Afaf Tahoon
Dokki, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T.REC/012/002302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.