Evaluation of the Utility of Preanestes@s, a Web Based Application for Preoperative Assessment

NCT ID: NCT04787783

Last Updated: 2024-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2254 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-12

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this prospective two-arm study, the investigators will evaluate the incidence of suboptimal preoperative assessments when the participants are evaluated through a web based application (Preanestes@s) versus the traditional outpatient interview.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preanestes@s is a web based application conceived to lead patients through the preoperative period. The application includes a patient interface which offers general and individualized information on the perioperative process, with the possibility of generating a dynamic interaction between patients and medical staff. Patient interface incorporates a web based preoperative questionnaire that once fully completed automatically indicates which preoperative tests are necessary and addresses patients to a virtual (non face to face) consultation or to traditional outpatient assessment. Both virtual and outpatient assessment are performed by an anesthesiologist. The web based questionnaire automatically assigns patients an ASA (from the American Society of Anesthesia Physical Status Classification) grade; this being a determining variable, although not the only one, when directing patients to the virtual or face-to-face consultation.The questionnaire therefore serves both for collection of clinical information and as a patient classification tool as well.

Virtual assessment is performed by evaluating both the filled web based questionnaire together with patient´s electronic records. Face to face assessment is performed in the traditional way by means of a clinical interview together with the consultation of patient's previous electronic records.

The virtual assessment is reserved for participants without significant comorbidity, which would correspond to patients classified as grade ASA 1-2; this means without diseases or with diseases that do not significantly compromise the integrity of the patient: well-controlled hypertension, active smoking without major lung disease, non-morbid obesity, etc. Patients with significant comorbidity (grade ASA ≥ 3), are referred to a face-to-face consultation.

This study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee -Comité de Ética e Investigación de Huelva-and signed by its Secretary María Dolores Santos Rubio, date 18.12.2019, and corresponds to the Phase 2 of the study "Evaluation of the utility and quality of the clinical information obtained through Preanestes@s, a web based application for preoperative assessment. Comparison of the virtual preanesthetic visit and the outpatient face-to-face visit.". Phase 2 is independent of Phase 1, entitled "Evaluation of the Quality of Preoperative Information Obtained Through Preanestes@s, a Web Based Application: Paired Comparison of a Web Based Questionnaire, a Virtual Non Face to Face Assessment and Outpatient Visit", registered in Clinical Trials with number of reference NCT04259268. Primary completion of Phase 1 have been concluded with date February 19, 2021, and preliminary analysis of data is currently being conducted by investigators.

In this study, the objective of the investigators is to assess whether the use of a web based application for the preoperative assessment allows an adequate completion of the preoperative process when compared to traditional face to face outpatient interview. The quality of the information recorded by this web based application has been previously tested by the investigators showing promising results in terms of security and accuracy.

The investigators have designed a prospective two-arm study to compare the performance of the two modalities of preoperative assessment: web based versus face to face outpatient visit.

The investigators will base their evaluation of performance on previously published criteria: the Andalusian Regional Government Health Council defines a "suboptimal preoperative assessment" (SOPA) as one that potentially generates "inadequate preparation of the patient that may affect the expected results". Specific criteria defining SOPA are detailed in the Outcomes Measures section of the present document.

Allocation of participants to each study arm will be consecutive and based on daily distribution of the clinics: participants submitted to one of two surgeries of any of the following (Orthopedics, General Surgery, ENT) will be allocated to either web based preoperative assessment or traditional face to face outpatient visit. Written informed consent will be obtained of all participants prior to their recruitment.

Statistical analysis Data collection and subsequent analysis will be performed by the investigators team. Qualitative variables will be represented through the absolute and marginal frequencies. The investigators will analyze the incidence of SOPA in both groups, using Chi square to study the difference between the proportions in the case of normal distribution, or, failing that, the Mann-Whitney U. In the same way, the investigators will study the differences for each of the defining criteria of SOPA.

Sample Size Following the model of Kinley et al in the study comparing the quality of the pre-anesthesia record carried out by anesthesia trainees versus trained nurses, the investigators will use the variable "incomplete studies that could have affected perioperative management" for the calculation of the sample size. This variable would be equivalent to the variable SOPA in present work. Based on Kinley data, the investigators will use an incomplete study rate of 15%, a figure that coincides with the standard "inadequate assessment" in the Guide for the Perioperative Process published by the Andalusian Regional Government Health Council, which establishes a maximum "acceptable" rate of inadequate completion of the preoperative protocols in 15%. In this study of equivalence between the two formats, the investigators will assume equivalence if a maximum difference of 25% between both formats is observed, which represents a differential of 3.75% over the initial 15%. Thus, for a two-sided calculation and assuming an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.2 (80% power), it would be necessary to include 1,127 participants per group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mobile Applications Internet-Based Intervention Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Preoperative Period

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Web based assessment

Participants will be leaded through preoperative period on a web based application. Participants will be addressed to either virtual or traditional face to face outpatient consultation on the basis of the information registered in the web based preoperative questionnaire that the application incorporates. Virtual assessment will be the performed by evaluating both the filled web based questionnaire together with participants´ electronic records. Face to face assessment will be performed in the traditional way by means of an interview with the participant together with the consultation of participant´s previous electronic records.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Web based preoperative assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Preoperative assessment conducted through a web based application

Traditional face to face assessment

Participants will be leaded through preoperative period following traditional institutional standards of care.

Face to face assessment will be performed in the traditional way by means of an interview with the participant together with the consultation of participant´s previous electronic records.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Web based preoperative assessment

Preoperative assessment conducted through a web based application

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Preanestes@s

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants undergoing day surgery in our institution: Hospital Duques del Infantado, from Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
* surgical specialities included: ENT, general surgery, orthopedics

Exclusion Criteria

* Urgent procedures, patients without the ability to understand informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manuel de la Matta, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

Seville, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Manuel de la Matta, MD

Role: CONTACT

0034 647493362

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Manuel de la Matta, MD

Role: primary

00 34 647 49 33 62

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, Hinkelbein J, Afshari A, Bettelli G, Bock M, Chew MS, Coburn M, De Robertis E, Drinhaus H, Feldheiser A, Geldner G, Lahner D, Macas A, Neuhaus C, Rauch S, Santos-Ampuero MA, Solca M, Tanha N, Traskaite V, Wagner G, Wappler F. Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;35(6):407-465. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000817.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29708905 (View on PubMed)

Pajuelo-Gallego A. Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía. Bloque Quirúrgico: proceso de soporte. 2004. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/saludyfamilias/areas/calidad-investigacion-conocimiento/gestion-conocimiento/paginas/pai-bloque-quirurgico.html

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Zaballos M, Lopez-Alvarez S, Argente P, Lopez A; Grupo de Trabajo de Pruebas Preoperatorias. Preoperative tests recommendations in adult patients for ambulatory surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2015 Jan;62(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 18. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25146773 (View on PubMed)

Blanco Vargas D, Faura Messa A, Izquierdo Tugas E, Santa-Olalla Bergua M, Noguera Sopena MM, Manoso Noriego M. [Online versus non-standard face to face preoperative assessment: cost effectiveness]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Aug-Sep;59(7):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.05.039. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22784647 (View on PubMed)

Goodhart IM, Andrzejowski JC, Jones GL, Berthoud M, Dennis A, Mills GH, Radley SC. Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative): Development and validation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):221-228. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000545.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27798453 (View on PubMed)

National Guideline Centre (UK). Preoperative Tests (Update): Routine Preoperative Tests for Elective Surgery. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Apr. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK355755/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27077168 (View on PubMed)

Lozada MJ, Nguyen JT, Abouleish A, Prough D, Przkora R. Patient preference for the pre-anesthesia evaluation: Telephone versus in-office assessment. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.040. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27185698 (View on PubMed)

Kinley H, Czoski-Murray C, George S, McCabe C, Primrose J, Reilly C, Wood R, Nicolson P, Healy C, Read S, Norman J, Janke E, Alhameed H, Fernandes N, Thomas E. Effectiveness of appropriately trained nurses in preoperative assessment: randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1323.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12468478 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Preanestes@s. Phase2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.