Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
402 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-03
2021-01-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of a Smart Device Application for Home-based Prehabilitation
NCT05363150
Efficacy of Preoperative Prehabilitation With a Home-based Supervised Exercise Program Against an Unsupervised Exercise Program for Frail Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery
NCT04892368
The Evaluation of MyPreOp, an Online Preoperative Assessment Tool
NCT02724189
Web-based Home Multimodal Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Major Surgeries
NCT05324345
Remote Monitoring of Surgical Patients Through VALIDIC
NCT05486962
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The need for efficient and cost-saving processes are driving healthcare practice. Computer-assisted history-taking systems have been shown to assist clinicians in the accurate eliciting of information from patients. Increasing evidence supports the use of such systems to triage patients and determine the timing of specialist-led anaesthetic review. Low-risk patients could be evaluated by an anaesthetist on the day of surgery while high-risk patients could be channeled into appropriate pathways for evaluation and optimisation prior to day of elective surgery.
This study is planned to be conducted in several phases:
In the first phase, the investigators aim to re-design and convert the current paper-based, nurse-administered health screening questionnaire into a reliable patient self-administered digitized tool - Pre-Anaesthesia CompuTerized Health-assessment (PATCH). The feasibility of introducing a digital pre-anaesthesia health assessment screening tool will first be assessed by conducting two discrete anonymized surveys on healthcare providers and elective surgical patients to explore their needs, attitudes and acceptability towards having a digitized tool. Next, a new paper-based preanaesthesia health screening questionnaire will be designed after extensive literature review of published, validated preanaesthesia screening questionnaires and a focus group evaluation by clinicians of the anaesthesia department.
Using the draft self-administered paper questionnaire, a pilot study of about 100 patients would be conducted after obtaining written informed consent. Feedback would be sought through a short structured interview that focuses on patient's perception of language, relevance of content and ease of completion. Patients would then be processed, as per standard of care, through a nurse-led interview using the paper-based tool. Validity of each assessment question is determined by percentage agreement method. Percentage agreement of 95% or higher is considered as good criterion validity. Analysis would also include measurement of identical, contradictory and non-contradictory response rates.
In the second phase, the paper-based questionnaire will be converted to a digitized tool on an iOS platform and accessible via a tablet, called Pre-Aneshtesia CompuTerized Health assessment (PATCH). PATCH and its server would be developed using a JavaScript framework. Patient responses using self-administration of PATCH would be validated against the responses obtained by a nurse using the same platform. After written informed consent, participating patients (n=250) will complete the health screening questionnaires on a tablet without help, after which a nurse who is blinded to the patient's responses, would conduct the health screening using the same platform . Responses for each screening question will be compared for agreement and percentage agreement of 95% or higher will be considered good criterion validity.
In the final phase, a two-arm, non-blinded randomized trial would be conducted at the Preadmission Service after written informed consent, comparing duration of nurse assessment in patients who have completed the self-administration of preanaesthesia health assessment using a tablet vs those undergoing standard care nurse-led interview. Based on an expected difference in means of 3 minutes and standard deviation of 3.5 minutes at 80% power and a level of significance of 5%, the total sample size for power of analysis is 44. To account for drop-outs, the investigators aim to recruit 52 patients in this phase. Duration of nurse assessment ("service time") will be measured by the "1Q 1Payment" system and is defined from the moment the nurse clicks on the queue system to call for the patient, to completion of the nurse assessment.
Primary aim(s):
To convert a paper-based preanaesthesia health screening questionnaire into an electronic tool, with at least 95% concordance of responses from patients
To compare the duration of nurse assessment at the Preadmission Service in patients randomized to self-administration of digital preanaesthesia health assessment vs those undergoing standard nurse interview
Primary hypotheses:
The conversion of a paper-based preanaesthesia health screening questionnaire can be converted into an electronic tool, with at least 95% concordance of responses from patients.
Self-administration of a digital preanaesthesia health assessment tool does not prolong nurse assessment at the Preadmission Service, compared with standard care nurse interview.
As a secondary aim, the patients' perceptions and experience in using PATCH will be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic health screening
Self-administered electronic health screening on tablet
Self-administered electronic health screening
Health assessment using an electronic device
Paper-based health screening
Routine-care nurse-administered, paper-based health screening
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self-administered electronic health screening
Health assessment using an electronic device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English-literate
* Able to use an iPad / tablet device
* Of any nationality
Exclusion Criteria
* Visually impaired
* Not English-literate
* Unable or refuses to use an iPad / tablet device
21 Years
90 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, National Technological University, Singapore
UNKNOWN
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eileen Lew
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PATCH01/11/17
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.