Anticipation of the Difficult Airway: the Preoperative Airway Assessment Form

NCT ID: NCT01037374

Last Updated: 2014-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

89 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see if our experimental preoperative airway assessment form is a better indicator of difficult airway as compared to the anesthesia record that is presently used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Predicting difficult airway continues to be problematic for even the most seasoned of anesthesiologists. In our study, the resident class will be our sample population. The residents will be randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group will be utilizing the new preoperative airway assessment form and the control group will be utilizing the standard anesthesia record. Simultaneously, a subset of our anesthesia experts will also be assessing patients preoperatively. The five areas of difficult airway management will be considered: difficult mask ventilation, difficult supraglottic airway, difficult laryngoscopy, difficult intubation, and difficult surgical airway.

According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the incidence of intubation has remained stable throughout the 1980s and 1990s despite attempts to predict its occurrence. Many of these cases were considered to be preventable; therefore, a better prediction of and preparation for difficult airway management may lead to a reduction in adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endotracheal Intubation Risk Assessment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Difficult Airway Assessment Form

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preoperative assessment form

Intervention Type OTHER

(based on the american society of anesthesiologists)components of the form include: neck measurements; neck mobility; mallampati; wilson's test; pre-existing conditions; and predictions of difficult mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, laryngoscopy, intubation, and surgical airway.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preoperative assessment form

(based on the american society of anesthesiologists)components of the form include: neck measurements; neck mobility; mallampati; wilson's test; pre-existing conditions; and predictions of difficult mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, laryngoscopy, intubation, and surgical airway.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CA-1, CA-2, and CA-3 anesthesiology residents starting from July 2008-July 2010

Exclusion Criteria

* the same anesthesiology residents who are working with patients 17 and younger, patients who are already intubated, and patients undergoing emergent surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carin A. Hagberg

Professor - Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carin A Hagberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center, Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Memorial Hermann Hospital, Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.uthouston.edu

university of texas at houston home page

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07-0144

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.