Airway Changes in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures in the Prone and Trendelenburg Positions

NCT ID: NCT02738788

Last Updated: 2025-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2026-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to track the intraoperative changes that occur in the airways of patients undergoing 1) laparoscopic surgeries in the Trendelenburg position, and 2) spinal surgeries in the prone position, as well as the regression of these changes postoperatively. These surgeries are known to cause edema and swelling of the soft tissues of the head and neck, temporarily worsening airway anatomy, but there is little data quantifying these changes, and no studies have investigated the time course required for the airway to return to its baseline after extubation. This would be important clinical information given that airway management is always a major concern perioperatively. The investigators will test hypotheses by evaluating patients' airways preoperatively, immediately post-extubation, and at regular intervals thereafter using the Modified Mallampati Score class (MMS), in which a patient's airway is scored from class 1 to 4 (in which 4 indicates the highest likelihood of a difficult intubation) based on the visibility of the soft palate, uvula, and faucial pillars inside the oral cavity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: One of the primary methods to assess airway dimension changes is the Modified Mallampati Score (MMS). MMS has been a valuable tool in assessing difficulty of intubation in previous studies as it is a simple, reproducible, and reliable preoperative and preanesthetic assessment of oral volume. MMS is evaluated by asking the patient to open their mouth and protrude their tongue without phonation. A score on a scale of 1-4 is assigned based on identifiable intraoral anatomic structures. MMS scores of 3 and 4 are strongly associated with difficult laryngoscopy and intubation.

Extensive observational research in the obstetric population has demonstrated that airway changes, including increasing MMS and decreasing oropharyngeal volume, occur during labor. It has been found that 63% of parturients experienced an increase in MMS over the course of their labor, with the fraction of patients scoring 3 or 4 peaking at 51.7%, compared with only 10.3% early in labor. Notably, of those patients that reached a class 4, 21% remained at that classification 48 hours postpartum. It has been found that 18% of patients whose airway class worsened during labor had not returned to their prelabor class 36-48 hours after delivery.

These obstetric findings have prompted a limited number of studies investigating airway changes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study will focus on surgeries in the prone and Trendelenburg positions, as they would intuitively predispose patients to edema and fluid retention in the head and neck. MMS increased in 78% of patients, with 29% increasing by two or more classes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. Furthermore, although laparoscopic surgery has been shown to increase lung and chest wall mechanical impedance, which leads to increases in abdominal and intrathoracic pressure, as well as an increase in central venous pressure with subsequent increases in intraocular pressure, no studies have been performed to specifically track resultant airway changes. Lastly, to investigators' knowledge no studies have investigated the postoperative resolution of airway changes after either type of procedure.

Rationale: There is evidence, both investigational and anecdotal, that airway changes may occur during certain surgeries or procedures, and that patient positioning may play a large role in precipitating them. However, research on this phenomenon in the surgical population, unlike the obstetric population, is sparse. Similarly, investigations into the time required for airway changes to regress back to baseline has been included in a number of obstetric airway studies, but not in any surgical ones. Lastly, it has been suggested that other surgical factors, such as fluid balance or procedure duration, may alter the degree of airway changes, but results from the few recent studies on the topic have been unclear. Thus, this study seeks to further investigate the influence of prone and Trendelenburg positioning, as well as surgical variables, on perioperative airway changes, and quantify the time required for patients' airways to return to their preoperative state.

Based on clinical observation, the primary hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference between mean scoring class change between 2 study groups from preoperative baseline to initial postoperative assessment. Investigators hypothesize that T-burg surgery patients will have a mean change of 2 classes compared to a mean change of only one class for prone spine surgery patients.

The secondary hypothesis is that airway changes occurring in patients undergoing prone procedures will resolve significantly sooner than (3 - 4 hours) than those of patients undergoing Trendelenburg surgeries (\> 4 hours).

Thirdly investigators will investigate the effects of demographic, physiological, and surgical \& anesthetic variables on postoperative MMS changes and their resolution.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intubation

The patient's airway will be visually assessed and photographed while the patient is resting comfortable in bed with the head up at 30-45 degrees and classified into one of 4 MMS categories. Digital photographs will be taken and the stored image prepared by the investigators in such a way that the patient cannot be individually identified (mouth only).

Neck circumference will be measured at the level of the thyroid cartilage using a tape measure, with temporary ink marks on the skin to allow for subsequent measurements at the same point.

After the patient has been extubated and recovered in the PACU for 30 minutes, their airway will be re-assessed and documented. These evaluations will be repeated at 2, 3, and 4 hours, as well as the next morning.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery in the prone position or laparoscopic or surgery in the Trendelenburg position.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a preoperative MMS of 4, existing oropharyngeal pathology, or the inability to fully open their mouth, or severely limited neck mobility
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tufts Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 11705

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.