Airway Changes in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures in the Prone and Trendelenburg Positions
NCT ID: NCT02738788
Last Updated: 2025-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
180 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-05-31
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Detachment of the Breathing Circuit on the Rate of DLT Malposition After Postural Change
NCT06182371
Effects of Postural Adjustment on Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Prone Spine Surgery Under General Anesthesia
NCT05749978
Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) in Prone Position During Spine Surgery
NCT04024410
Application of Tracheal Intubation in Lateral Position in Thoracic Surgery
NCT05482230
Effect of Periodic Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers on Intraoperative Atelectasis in Adult Patients Undergoing Prone Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT07325812
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extensive observational research in the obstetric population has demonstrated that airway changes, including increasing MMS and decreasing oropharyngeal volume, occur during labor. It has been found that 63% of parturients experienced an increase in MMS over the course of their labor, with the fraction of patients scoring 3 or 4 peaking at 51.7%, compared with only 10.3% early in labor. Notably, of those patients that reached a class 4, 21% remained at that classification 48 hours postpartum. It has been found that 18% of patients whose airway class worsened during labor had not returned to their prelabor class 36-48 hours after delivery.
These obstetric findings have prompted a limited number of studies investigating airway changes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study will focus on surgeries in the prone and Trendelenburg positions, as they would intuitively predispose patients to edema and fluid retention in the head and neck. MMS increased in 78% of patients, with 29% increasing by two or more classes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. Furthermore, although laparoscopic surgery has been shown to increase lung and chest wall mechanical impedance, which leads to increases in abdominal and intrathoracic pressure, as well as an increase in central venous pressure with subsequent increases in intraocular pressure, no studies have been performed to specifically track resultant airway changes. Lastly, to investigators' knowledge no studies have investigated the postoperative resolution of airway changes after either type of procedure.
Rationale: There is evidence, both investigational and anecdotal, that airway changes may occur during certain surgeries or procedures, and that patient positioning may play a large role in precipitating them. However, research on this phenomenon in the surgical population, unlike the obstetric population, is sparse. Similarly, investigations into the time required for airway changes to regress back to baseline has been included in a number of obstetric airway studies, but not in any surgical ones. Lastly, it has been suggested that other surgical factors, such as fluid balance or procedure duration, may alter the degree of airway changes, but results from the few recent studies on the topic have been unclear. Thus, this study seeks to further investigate the influence of prone and Trendelenburg positioning, as well as surgical variables, on perioperative airway changes, and quantify the time required for patients' airways to return to their preoperative state.
Based on clinical observation, the primary hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference between mean scoring class change between 2 study groups from preoperative baseline to initial postoperative assessment. Investigators hypothesize that T-burg surgery patients will have a mean change of 2 classes compared to a mean change of only one class for prone spine surgery patients.
The secondary hypothesis is that airway changes occurring in patients undergoing prone procedures will resolve significantly sooner than (3 - 4 hours) than those of patients undergoing Trendelenburg surgeries (\> 4 hours).
Thirdly investigators will investigate the effects of demographic, physiological, and surgical \& anesthetic variables on postoperative MMS changes and their resolution.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intubation
The patient's airway will be visually assessed and photographed while the patient is resting comfortable in bed with the head up at 30-45 degrees and classified into one of 4 MMS categories. Digital photographs will be taken and the stored image prepared by the investigators in such a way that the patient cannot be individually identified (mouth only).
Neck circumference will be measured at the level of the thyroid cartilage using a tape measure, with temporary ink marks on the skin to allow for subsequent measurements at the same point.
After the patient has been extubated and recovered in the PACU for 30 minutes, their airway will be re-assessed and documented. These evaluations will be repeated at 2, 3, and 4 hours, as well as the next morning.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tufts Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 11705
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.