An Anesthesia-Centered Bundle to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: The PRIME-AIR Study

NCT ID: NCT04108130

Last Updated: 2025-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

794 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-29

Study Completion Date

2023-07-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. National estimates suggest 1,062,000 PPCs per year, with 46,200 deaths, and 4.8 million additional days of hospitalization. The objective of the study is to develop and implement perioperative strategies to eliminate PPCs in abdominal surgery, the field with the largest absolute number of PPCs. We will conduct a randomized controlled pragmatic trial in 750 studied participants. The effectiveness of an individualized perioperative anesthesia-centered bundle will be compared to the usual anesthetic care in patients receiving open abdominal surgery. At the end of this project, the investigators expect to change clinical practice by establishing a new and clinically feasible anesthesia-centered strategy to reduce perioperative lung morbidity. The research will be conducted across 14 US academic centers, and will be funded by the National Institute of Health.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. National estimates suggest 1,062,000 PPCs per year, with 46,200 deaths, and 4.8 million additional days of hospitalization. Abdominal surgery is the field with the largest absolute number of PPCs. The long-term goal is to develop and implement perioperative strategies to eliminate PPCs. Whereas PPCs are as significant and lethal as cardiac complications, research in the field has received much less attention, and strategies to minimize PPCs are regrettably limited. Recently, the investigators and others have suggested a crucial role of anesthesia related interventions such as ventilatory strategies, and administration and reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents in reducing PPCs. These findings are consistent with the beneficial effects of lung protective ventilation during the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While surgical patients differ substantially from ARDS patients as most have no or limited lung injury at the start of surgery, intraoperative anesthetic and abdominal surgery interventions result in lung derecruitment and predispose to or produce direct and indirect, potentially multiple-hit, lung injury. Thus, effective anesthetic strategies aiming at early lung protection in this group of patients are greatly needed. Indeed, the current lack of evidence results in wide and unexplained variability in anesthetic practices creating a major public health issue as some practices within usual care appear to be suboptimal and even potentially injurious. The investigators hypothesize that an anesthesia-centered bundle, based on recent findings and focused on perioperative lung protection, will minimize multiple and synergistic factors responsible for the multiple-hit perioperative pulmonary dysfunction and result in decreased incidence and severity of PPCs. Founded on strong preliminary data, we will leverage a network of US academic centers to study this hypothesis in two aims: Aim 1. To compare the number and severity of PPCs in participants receiving an individualized perioperative anesthesia-centered bundle to those in participants receiving usual anesthetic care during open abdominal surgery. For this, the investigators propose to conduct a prospective multicenter randomized controlled pragmatic trial with a blinded assessor in a total of 750 studied participants. The bundle will consist of optimal mechanical ventilation comprising individualized positive end-expiratory pressure to maximize respiratory system compliance and minimize driving pressures, individualized use of neuromuscular blocking agents and their reversal, and postoperative lung expansion and early mobilization; Aim 2. To assess the effect of the proposed bundle on plasma levels of lung injury biomarkers. The investigators theorize that our intervention will minimize overinflation and atelectasis reducing plasma levels of biomarkers of lung inflammatory, epithelial, and endothelial injury. Such mechanistic insights will facilitate bundle dissemination and support adoption as it has for lung protective ventilation for ARDS. At the end of this project, the investigators expect to change clinical practice by establishing a new and clinically feasible anesthesia-centered strategy to reduce perioperative lung morbidity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

Participants in this arm will receive usual anesthetic and postoperative care as provided in each site.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention

This arm will receive the bundle of interventions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preoperative Education

Intervention Type OTHER

Brochure and video about relevance of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative mobilization and use of incentive spirometry.

Intraoperative PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) Individualization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PEEP will be set by maximizing respiratory system compliance along a decremental PEEP titration following an incremental recruitment maneuver.

Individualization of Neuromuscular Blockade

Intervention Type OTHER

Administration of neuromuscular blocking agents and their reversal will be done based on established protocol.

Postoperative Incentive Spirometry

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be encouraged to adhere to incentive spirometry to be started 2 hours after surgery and maintained until participant freely ambulates. Supervision will be provided 3 times/day for continuous education and management of barriers to optimal performance.

Postoperative Ambulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be encouraged to adhere to prescription of early ambulation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preoperative Education

Brochure and video about relevance of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative mobilization and use of incentive spirometry.

Intervention Type OTHER

Intraoperative PEEP (Positive End-Expiratory Pressure) Individualization

PEEP will be set by maximizing respiratory system compliance along a decremental PEEP titration following an incremental recruitment maneuver.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Individualization of Neuromuscular Blockade

Administration of neuromuscular blocking agents and their reversal will be done based on established protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

Postoperative Incentive Spirometry

Participants will be encouraged to adhere to incentive spirometry to be started 2 hours after surgery and maintained until participant freely ambulates. Supervision will be provided 3 times/day for continuous education and management of barriers to optimal performance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Postoperative Ambulation

Participants will be encouraged to adhere to prescription of early ambulation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (\>=18 years) scheduled for elective surgery with expected duration \>=2 hours
* Open abdominal surgery including: gastric, biliary, pancreatic, hepatic, major bowel, ovarian, renal tract, bladder, prostatic, radical hysterectomy, and pelvic exenteration
* Intermediate or high risk of PPCs defined by an ARISCAT (Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia Score) risk score\>=26

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability or refusal to provide consent
* Inability or significant difficulty to perform any study interventions, including incentive spirometry, ambulation and/or maintaining follow-up contact with study personnel for up to 90 days after the date of surgery.
* Participation in any interventional research study within 30 days of the time of the study.
* Previous surgery within 30 days prior to this study.
* Pregnancy
* Emergency surgery
* Severe obesity (above Class I, BMI\>=35 kg/m2)
* Significant lung disease: any diagnosed or treated respiratory condition that (a) requires home oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (except nocturnal treatment of sleep apnea without supplemental oxygen), (b) severely limits exercise tolerance to \<4 metabolic equivalents (METs) (e.g., patients unable to do light housework, walk flat at 4 miles/h or climb one flight of stairs), (c) required previous lung surgery, or (d) includes presence of severe pulmonary emphysema or bullae
* Significant heart disease: cardiac conditions that limit exercise tolerance to \<4 METs
* Renal failure: peritoneal or hemodialysis requirement or preoperative creatinine \>=2 mg/dL
* Neuromuscular disease that impairs ability to ventilate without assistance
* Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score \>9, Appendix I)
* Sepsis
* Malignancy or other irreversible condition for which 6-month mortality is estimated \>=20%
* Bone marrow transplant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcos F Vidal Melo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California - San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research and Education, Inc.

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Univerisity of Massachusetts Amherst Center

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Hospital

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

PROVE Network Investigators for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology; Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug 9;384(9942):495-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60416-5. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24894577 (View on PubMed)

Writing Committee for the PROBESE Collaborative Group of the PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet) for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology; Bluth T, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M; PROBESE Collaborative Group; Bluth T, Bobek I, Canet JC, Cinnella G, de Baerdemaeker L, Gama de Abreu M, Gregoretti C, Hedenstierna G, Hemmes SNT, Hiesmayr M, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Laffey J, Licker MJ, Markstaller K, Matot I, Mills GH, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Putensen C, Rossaint R, Schmitt J, Schultz MJ, Senturk M, Serpa Neto A, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Vidal Melo MF, Wrigge H. Effect of Intraoperative High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With Recruitment Maneuvers vs Low PEEP on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2292-2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7505.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31157366 (View on PubMed)

Williams EC, Motta-Ribeiro GC, Vidal Melo MF. Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation? Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):155-163. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002731.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31094753 (View on PubMed)

Ladha K, Vidal Melo MF, McLean DJ, Wanderer JP, Grabitz SD, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study. BMJ. 2015 Jul 14;351:h3646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3646.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26174419 (View on PubMed)

Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Epstein RH, Kor DJ, Bartz RR, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Vidal Melo MF, Blum JM. Temporal trends and current practice patterns for intraoperative ventilation at U.S. academic medical centers: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Mar 28;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0010-3. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25852301 (View on PubMed)

de Jong MAC, Ladha KS, Vidal Melo MF, Staehr-Rye AK, Bittner EA, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Differential Effects of Intraoperative Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on Respiratory Outcome in Major Abdominal Surgery Versus Craniotomy. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):362-369. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001499.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26496082 (View on PubMed)

Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B, Verzilli D, Leone M, De Jong A, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S; IMPROVE Study Group. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):428-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23902482 (View on PubMed)

Ferrando C, Soro M, Unzueta C, Suarez-Sipmann F, Canet J, Librero J, Pozo N, Peiro S, Llombart A, Leon I, India I, Aldecoa C, Diaz-Cambronero O, Pestana D, Redondo FJ, Garutti I, Balust J, Garcia JI, Ibanez M, Granell M, Rodriguez A, Gallego L, de la Matta M, Gonzalez R, Brunelli A, Garcia J, Rovira L, Barrios F, Torres V, Hernandez S, Gracia E, Gine M, Garcia M, Garcia N, Miguel L, Sanchez S, Pineiro P, Pujol R, Garcia-Del-Valle S, Valdivia J, Hernandez MJ, Padron O, Colas A, Puig J, Azparren G, Tusman G, Villar J, Belda J; Individualized PeRioperative Open-lung VEntilation (iPROVE) Network. Individualised perioperative open-lung approach versus standard protective ventilation in abdominal surgery (iPROVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Mar;6(3):193-203. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30024-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29371130 (View on PubMed)

Brandao JC, Lessa MA, Motta-Ribeiro G, Hashimoto S, Paula LF, Torsani V, Le L, Bao X, Eikermann M, Dahl DM, Deng H, Tabatabaei S, Amato MBP, Vidal Melo MF. Global and Regional Respiratory Mechanics During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Study. Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1564-1573. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004289.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31743177 (View on PubMed)

Fernandez-Bustamante A, Parker RA, Frendl G, Lee JW, Nagrebetsky A, Grecu L, Amar D, Tanaka P, Sprung J, Gupta RA, Subramanian B, Giquel J, Eikermann M, Musch G, Nadler JW, Gama de Abreu M, Bartels K, Grover M, Chen LL, Sparling J, Douin DJ, Weingarten T, Wagener G, Thompson BT, Vidal Melo MF; Perioperative Research Network (PRN) Investigators. Perioperative lung expansion and pulmonary outcomes after open abdominal surgery versus usual care in the USA (PRIME-AIR): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2025 May;13(5):447-459. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00040-2. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40020692 (View on PubMed)

Fernandez-Bustamante A, Parker RA, Sprung J, Eikermann M, Gama de Abreu M, Ferrando C, Thompson BT, Vidal Melo MF. An anesthesia-centered bundle to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications: The PRIME-AIR study protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283748. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37023031 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HL140177

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

5UH3HL140177-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AAAT9106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Air Leak Detection and Treatment
NCT05854654 RECRUITING NA