Initial Positioning of Left Sided Double Lumen Endobronchial Tubes Using Peak Inspiratory Pressures Difference Between Two Lungs

NCT ID: NCT01533012

Last Updated: 2019-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-01

Study Completion Date

2012-10-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate a performance of initial positioning of left sided double lumen endobronchial tubes using peak inspiratory pressures difference between two lungs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

If both lungs have relatively equal volumes and the double lumen tube is in a satisfactory position, peak inspiratory pressure between two lungs is similar or equal when each lumen is sequentially clamped while ventilating each lung with the same tidal volume. We are going to investigate a performance of this method by fiberoptic bronchoscopy view and depth of double lumen tube, and compare with an conventional auscultation method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pressure difference

Peak inspiratory pressures difference between two lungs

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pressure difference

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peak inspiratory pressures difference between two lungs

FOB evaluation

FOB evaluation for the optimal position of tubes

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pressure difference

Peak inspiratory pressures difference between two lungs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status class I, II
* Use of double lumen tube
* Normal preoperative pulmonary function study

Exclusion Criteria

* COPD
* Restrictive lung disease
* CAOD
* Unstable hemodynamic status
* Peak inspiratory pressure \> 30 mm Hg (Two lung ventilation)
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine , Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim SH, Choi YS, Shin S, Cho JS, Nam DJ, Oh YJ. Positioning of double-lumen tubes based on the minimum peak inspiratory pressure difference between the right and left lungs in short patients: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Mar;31(3):137-42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328364c3a7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24047768 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2011-0619

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.