Insertion Depth of Left-sided Double-lumen Tube: a New Predictive Formula

NCT ID: NCT04329416

Last Updated: 2020-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-07

Study Completion Date

2020-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The authors developed a formula for predicting the accurate depth of DLT insertion into the appropriate bronchus based on height as follows \[The predicted insertion depth of left DLT (cm) equals 0.249 × (BH)0.916\] \[R\]. That pilot study showed comparable correlations between five formulae \[Brodsky et al, Bahk and Oh R, Takita et al, Chow et al, Lin\]. However, that formula developed has not been validated yet.

We hypothesized that previously published formula would predict the accurate depth of left-sided DLT insertion. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of this formula to estimate the optimum insertion depth of the DLT using a flexible bronchoscope and decrease the incidence of DLT displacement into the appropriate bronchus, the need for bronchoscopic adjustment, and complications including soreness of throat and mucosal injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Accurate placement of the double-lumen tube \[DLT\], the commonly used tool to provide one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery, is a real challenge for the thoracic anesthesiologists. Optimal DLT depth, defined as the blue endobronchial cuff below the carina, would decrease the incidence of obstructing the trachea and the contralateral bronchus (Brodsky). Additionally, deep insertion of the bronchial cuff of the DLT would obstruct the upper lobe bronchus (Brodsky). The careful adjustment of the depth and optimal positioning of the DLT using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope need a skilled anesthesiologist to reduce the time to DLT intubation. (Charles D. Boucek et al)

There are several methods have been described to predict the proper depth of DLT insertion. Chow et al. documented the validity of the developed formula based on the clavicular-to-carinal distance of trachea and height in 78% of patients studied. Brodsky et al. demonstrated that a height-and-gender-based formula could predict the depth of DLT insertion. Liu et al. reported an accurate depth of DLT insertion in 90% of patients studied measuring the distance between the vocal cord and carina according to the chest CT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Surgery One Lung Ventilation Left-sided Double Lumen Tube

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A prospective observational single-center open-label study
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Predicted depth of insertion

The predicted insertion depth of the DLT was calculated using the formula \[0.249 x (BH) 0.916\] before induction of anesthesia using an application on the smartphone

Group Type OTHER

Predicted depth of insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

A left-sided double-lumen tube was introduced beyond the vocal cords when the train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve revealed 1 or 2 twitches, the stylet was removed, the double-lumen tube was rotated 90° counterclockwise and then advanced blindly to the predicted depth of insertion.

Optimized depth of insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

The optimal position of the double-lumen tube, defined as the inflated endobronchial cuff is placed in the left main bronchus just below the carina without herniation, which was confirmed using a flexible bronchoscope in both supine and lateral decubitus positions.

Adjustment of depth of insertion

Intervention Type OTHER

If the endobronchial cuff was placed too deeply or too proximal, subsequently, the double-lumen tube was withdrawn or advanced, respectively, using the flexible bronchoscope until the optimum position of the double-lumen tube was achieved.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Predicted depth of insertion

A left-sided double-lumen tube was introduced beyond the vocal cords when the train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve revealed 1 or 2 twitches, the stylet was removed, the double-lumen tube was rotated 90° counterclockwise and then advanced blindly to the predicted depth of insertion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Optimized depth of insertion

The optimal position of the double-lumen tube, defined as the inflated endobronchial cuff is placed in the left main bronchus just below the carina without herniation, which was confirmed using a flexible bronchoscope in both supine and lateral decubitus positions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Adjustment of depth of insertion

If the endobronchial cuff was placed too deeply or too proximal, subsequently, the double-lumen tube was withdrawn or advanced, respectively, using the flexible bronchoscope until the optimum position of the double-lumen tube was achieved.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Underwent thoracic surgery
* Using a left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

* Anticipated or known difficult airway
* Refuse to sign the consent
* Withdraw the consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Saud University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abdelazeem A Eldawlatly, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University

Mohamed R El Tahan, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia & Surgical Intensive Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (formerly, University of Dammam), Dammam, Saudi Arabia,

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King Saud University

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E-18-3064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.