Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-30
2022-06-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Timely fluid resuscitation, initiated as soon as possible after major burn injury, is the main tenet of acute burn care. Lack of adequate resuscitation in major burn injuries leads to kidney injury, progression of burn injury, sepsis, burn shock, and death. The current standard of care for major burn resuscitation is intravenous fluid resuscitation. In Nepal, however, adequately trained and equipped hospitals for treatment of burn care are not available (for a variety of reasons). Additionally, there is not a systematic emergency medical transport system available for provision of medical care and resuscitation during transport. Enteral-based resuscitation with substances like the WHO Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) is recommended by burn experts and the professional burn societies when resources and access to intravenous fluid resuscitation are not available in resource-constrained settings such as rural areas, low- and middle-income countries, and military battlefield scenarios. Studies have previously demonstrated the efficacy and safety of enteral-based resuscitation in controlled, high-resource settings, however there have not been real-world effectiveness trials in austere settings. Therefore, the investigators seek to ultimately address the problem of pre-hospital and pre-burn center admission resuscitation by studying the feasibility and effectiveness of enteral resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) in preventing burn shock.
This study examines enteral (oral)-based resuscitation with ORS and IV Fluids versus only IV Fluids for the treatment of major burn injuries. The intervention portion of the study will entail randomization of patients presenting with acute burn injuries of 20-40% total body surface area (TBSA) to an enteral-based resuscitation versus the standard of care IV fluid resuscitation. The intervention will continue through the 24-72 hours of the acute resuscitation period.
This is a feasibility study, primarily to develop and establish the research infrastructure and practices at the study site for future pilot study and eventually randomized-controlled trial research on this intervention. The primary outcomes will be measures of feasibility such as the adherence rate to the resuscitation protocols. Further, there will be a qualitative component to the study with focus group interviews of the bedside healthcare providers (doctors and nurses) who are caring for the enrolled patients, in order to understand the challenges and facilitators of enteral resuscitation. Qualitative analysis will be done to understand the major themes of challenges and facilitators to enteral resuscitation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Emergency Call on Drowning
NCT06310486
Point-of-care-ultrasound in Swiss Air Rescue Rega
NCT06602856
AFrican Resuscitation Ultrasound In Critically-ill Adults
NCT02794909
Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Management of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema
NCT04288219
Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department
NCT05649891
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Enteral-based Protocolized Resuscitation
Administration of Enteral-based Resuscitation using Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) either by mouth of via naso-enteric access for moderate sized burn injuries (20-40% TBSA) per resuscitation protocol for burn-injured patients. Resuscitation will be administered in the acute resuscitation phase of burn injury (24-72 hours post injury). Patients will receive supplemental Intravenous Fluid (IV Fluid) resuscitation using Lactated Ringer's solution as needed per protocol.
Oral Rehydration Solution
Feasibility study of Enteral-based resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) vs standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation for moderate-sized burn injuries in Nepal
Lactated Ringer
Standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation
Intravenous Fluid Protocolized Resuscitation
Administration of Intravenous Fluid using Lactated Ringer's solution per standard of care resuscitation protocol for patients with moderate sized burn injuries (20-40% TBSA).
Lactated Ringer
Standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral Rehydration Solution
Feasibility study of Enteral-based resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) vs standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation for moderate-sized burn injuries in Nepal
Lactated Ringer
Standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults aged ≥18 years who present with moderate-sized burn injuries \[20 - 40% total body surface areas (TBSA)\] to the Nepal Cleft and Burn Center within 24 hours of injury.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients in overt shock (defined as serum lactate \>2.5, or hypotension and altered mental status).
* Pregnant patients, psychiatrically unstable patients will be excluded.
* Patients with oropharyngeal defects and/or previously known diagnoses leading to high risk of aspiration, and/or precluding safe nasal-enteric access will be excluded.
* Patients will history of chronic nausea and/or vomiting, including those with a diagnosis of gastroparesis due to diabetes mellitus will be excluded.
* Patients with a Baux score of over 100 (age + TBSA), patients with declared palliative intent on admission, and patients for whom clinicians have high level of clinical concern based on clinical judgement will also be excluded.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kajal Mehta, MD MPH
Global Health Research Fellow, School of Medicine: Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kajal Mehta, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nepal Cleft and Burn Center at Kirtipur Hospital
Ki̇̄rtipur, Bagmati, Nepal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00010934
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.