B-lines Lung Ultrasound Guided ED Management of Acute Heart Failure Pilot Trial
NCT ID: NCT03136198
Last Updated: 2024-06-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-10
2019-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IVC and Lung Ultrasound B-lines Guided Decongestion in Critically Ill ESKD Patients With Heart Failure
NCT06373575
Bedside Ultrasound-guided Volume Management and Discharge Timing for Patients With Heart Failure During Hospitalization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07046169
B-line by Lung US in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
NCT04322851
Volume Responsiveness By Ultrasound Of Carotid Blood Flow In Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
NCT05271227
Does Ultrasound Assessment for Extravascular Lung Water and IVC Measurement Affect Outcomes in Inpatient Heart Failure Management?
NCT04436718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: To demonstrate the effectiveness of a targeted decongestion strategy - LUS guided, protocol-driven ED AHF management - will result in improved 30-day outcomes vs. usual care. This aim will be tested using a randomized, controlled, unblinded, pragmatic, multi-center, simple trial design.
The pilot trial may determine that ED management alone is insufficient to impact the outcome. Thus, the investigators may need to modify their subsequent trial design to include targeted therapy throughout hospitalization. However, the pilot study will demonstrate whether targeted therapy effectively reduces B-lines.
PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT Over one million hospitalizations for AHF occur every year in the US. Within 30 days after hospitalization, over 25% of AHF patients will be dead or re-hospitalized.4 Up to 67% of patients will be re-hospitalized and 36% will be dead by one year. For patients aged 65 years and older, AHF is the most common and most expensive reason for hospitalization. Despite major reductions in morbidity and mortality for chronic HF, considerably less progress has been seen in AHF.
Congestion is the primary reason why AHF patients present to the ED seeking medical care. Congestion is manifest by signs and symptoms of heart failure (HF); dyspnea, orthopnea, edema, and weight gain. Yet, how to best assess, grade, and manage congestion is not well established.
Freedom from congestion is associated with improved outcomes; Yet many patients leave the hospital inadequately decongested. The absence of robust, reliable methods to assess congestion is a primary reason why it is not well-assessed. A recent consensus statement published in 2010 highlights this fact: "…no method to assess congestion…has been validated." The investigators would argue many ED AHF patients are poorly assessed prior to treatment. In addition, they are poorly re-assessed prior to hospitalization to gauge the success or failure of initial management. While physical exam is currently the cornerstone of congestion assessment, it lacks sensitivity and inter-rater reliability.
The investigators challenge the current paradigm of relying on insensitive methods of congestion to guide therapy. Furthermore, they argue the lack of a robust evidence base for ED management of congestion contributes to poor outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LUS-guided strategy-of-care
Patients randomized to the LUS strategy of care arm will be treated according to protocol. This protocol only involves therapies used in everyday AHF clinical practice.
LUS-guided strategy-of-care
For patients randomized to the strategy-of-care arm, the LUS guided protocol will be initiated and continued until there is a decrease in B-lines to ≤ 15 or 6 hours of care has been delivered, whichever comes first.
Treatment protocol:
1. IV furosemide (unless already given): 2x single oral dose if on chronic therapy or 20-40 mg if diuretic naive.
2. Optional therapies: non-invasive ventilation, vasodilators (SL, topical, or IV)
3. Reassessment every 2 hours
Intravenous Loop Diuretic
IV loop diuretic
Vasodilator
IV, topical, or SL Vasodilator
Non invasive Ventilation (NIV)
Face, mouth, or nasal mask applied to provide positive pressure ventilation
Usual care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm will also undergo lung ultrasound assessments. However, these results will not be revealed to the care team. Patients will receive treatment per usual, standard care.
Usual Care
Patients will receive usual AHF care
Intravenous Loop Diuretic
IV loop diuretic
Vasodilator
IV, topical, or SL Vasodilator
Non invasive Ventilation (NIV)
Face, mouth, or nasal mask applied to provide positive pressure ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LUS-guided strategy-of-care
For patients randomized to the strategy-of-care arm, the LUS guided protocol will be initiated and continued until there is a decrease in B-lines to ≤ 15 or 6 hours of care has been delivered, whichever comes first.
Treatment protocol:
1. IV furosemide (unless already given): 2x single oral dose if on chronic therapy or 20-40 mg if diuretic naive.
2. Optional therapies: non-invasive ventilation, vasodilators (SL, topical, or IV)
3. Reassessment every 2 hours
Usual Care
Patients will receive usual AHF care
Intravenous Loop Diuretic
IV loop diuretic
Vasodilator
IV, topical, or SL Vasodilator
Non invasive Ventilation (NIV)
Face, mouth, or nasal mask applied to provide positive pressure ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presents with shortness of breath at rest or with minimal exertion
* Clinical diagnosis of AHF and presence of \> 15 total bilateral B-lines distributed in at least 4 zones on initial LUS
* Hx of chronic HF and any one of the following:
* Chest radiograph consistent with AHF
* Jugular venous distension
* Pulmonary rales on auscultation
* Lower extremity edema
Exclusion Criteria
* Shock of any kind. Any requirement for vasopressors or inotropes.
* Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 100 or \>175 mmHg
* Need for immediate intubation
* Acute Coronary Syndrome- Presentation consistent with myocardial ischemia AND either new ST-segment elevation/depression
* Fever \>101.5 ºF or chest radiograph or clinical picture of pneumonia
* End stage HF: transplant list, ventricular assist device
* Anemia requiring transfusion
* Known interstitial lung disease
* Suspected acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
* Pregnant or recently pregnant within the last 6 months
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Inova Fairfax Hospital
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Case Western Reserve University
OTHER
Wayne State University
OTHER
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
PETER S PANG
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter S Pang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eskenazi Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
IU Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Detroit Receiving Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
INOVA Health System
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pang PS, Russell FM, Ehrman R, Ferre R, Gargani L, Levy PD, Noble V, Lane KA, Li X, Collins SP. Lung Ultrasound-Guided Emergency Department Management of Acute Heart Failure (BLUSHED-AHF): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Sep;9(9):638-648. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
Russell FM, Ehrman RR, Ferre R, Gargani L, Noble V, Rupp J, Collins SP, Hunter B, Lane KA, Levy P, Li X, O'Connor C, Pang PS. Design and rationale of the B-lines lung ultrasound guided emergency department management of acute heart failure (BLUSHED-AHF) pilot trial. Heart Lung. 2019 May-Jun;48(3):186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.