Utility of Serial BNP Levels in Emergency Department CHF

NCT ID: NCT00534066

Last Updated: 2007-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-09-30

Study Completion Date

2006-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine if a series of BNP blood tests performed on patients who present to the Emergency Department with congestive heart failure (CHF) can predict which patients may have adverse outcomes. If the BNP is shown to be predictive of bad outcomes in certain patients, those patients might receive more intensive therapy early to prevent such outcomes. This was a prospective trial enrolling patients who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with heart failure. Subjects had a blood test for BNP, which is elevated in the presence of heart failure, collected twelve hours after their initial clinical BNP was obtained in the ED. Demographics, history, length of hospital stay, and other approved data were collected. At 30 days and 6 months after discharge, a follow up call was made to determine if the subject had required additional emergency care, had been admitted to a hospital, or had died during that period of time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BNP is a 32-amino acid peptide secreted almost exclusively by the ventricles under conditions of ventricular wall strain.Multiple studies have examined the utility of BNP as a marker of decompensated heart failure, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Several studies have examined the use of a single BNP measure to predict adverse outcomes in CHF patients. Typical study designs have utilized CHF specialty clinics or patients admitted for congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation as the study population. Very few studies have utilized BNP in the acute care setting; these studies have also used BNP as a single measure. As the serum half-life of BNP is approximately 22 minutes,BNP levels will respond to measures decreasing ventricular wall strain, such that a decreasing BNP level should be diagnostic of improved CHF. It is our hypothesis that Emergency Department patients with acute CHF exacerbation and a decreasing serum BNP level after 12 hours of therapy will demonstrate an improved outcome when compared to patients whose BNP does not decrease.

Our goal is to establish the utility of serial BNP levels during the intensive initial management of acute CHF. One and six month follow-up patient outcomes will be collected and compared against the serial BNP measurements while the patient was in the acute phase of treatment. It is our hypothesis that serial brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels compared at 0 and 12 hours for research purposes will be predictive of a combined endpoint of death, readmission, or repeat Emergency Department visit for recurrent CHF in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with an acute exacerbation of CHF.

To date, no data has been published regarding the utility of serial BNP measurements in the observation unit management of CHF. Our study proposes to compare outcomes in patients managed in the Clinical Decision Unit (CDU), a six bed observation unit in our Emergency Department, against patients admitted for CHF exacerbation. The primary outcome of the study will be the combined endpoint of death, readmission, or repeat Emergency Department visit for recurrent CHF at 30 days and 6 months. For inpatients, and those patients admitted from the CDU to the inpatient service, additional outcome measures will be adverse outcomes (intubation, balloon pump, death, etc) during the index hospitalization. As the clinicians managing the patient will not have access to the 12 hour BNP level, the measurement of BNP itself will not be a source of bias. Our secondary hypothesis is that the occurrence of the combined endpoint will be independent of treatment location (CDU vs inpatient) as opposed to responder vs. non-responder status.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congestive Heart Failure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

DEFINED_POPULATION

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Admitted

Patients presenting to the ED with acute exacerbation of CHF who require admission to the hospital directly from the ED

No interventions assigned to this group

Observational

Patients who present to the ED for acute exacerbation of CHF who are transferred to the Observation Unit from the ED for up to 24 hours.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age18 or older
* primary diagnosis of CHF in the Emergency Department
* admission to the hospital or transfer to the Observation Unit

Exclusion Criteria

* minors, prisoners,pregnant women,unable to provide consent
* unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction in the ED
* dialysis dependent patients
* use of nesiritide as a therapy in the ED
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian C Hiestand, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2002H0262

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id