The Effects of Sımulatıon Used in Vagınal Chıldbırth on Malpractıce Tendency And Perceptıons of Care Behavıors
NCT ID: NCT04656574
Last Updated: 2020-12-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-26
2017-09-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
H1b: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have an effect on midwifery students' perceptions of care behaviors.
H0a: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have not an effect on malpractice trends of midwifery students.
H0b: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have not an effect on midwifery students' perceptions of care behaviors.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study universe comprised 79 students who took the course about vaginal delivery (which is included in the midwifery curriculum) provided using simulation-based training and 90 students taking this course for the first time. The study included 120 participants, including 60 randomly selected students who agreed to participate in the study, were enrolled in midwifery, and took the course explaining vaginal delivery for the first time and 60 randomly selected students who received this education using simulation-based training.
The simulation training included the activities that midwives should do during the birth and management of vaginal delivery. Bone pelvis, fetal head, fetus, cervical dilatation-effacement, fetal descensus, maternal-neonatal birthing simulators and chicken breast model for episiotomy were used by the researchers to monitor, manage, and provide care for the progress of labor. The students in the control group received theoretical training about management and care of vaginal delivery. In addition, the researchers demonstrated them how to monitor and manage the delivery process and provide care.
Data collection tools included a personal information form, medical malpractice tendency scale in nursing, and caring assessment questionnaire.
Statistical analyses were made using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) Statistics 22 software. The findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics (average, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine normal distribution of the data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
Experimental group received the course explaining vaginal delivery for the first timethat used simulation-based training.
Simulation-based training
The simulation training included the activities that midwives should do during the birth and management of vaginal delivery with episiotomy. The students received theoretical training, and to reinforce it, they were asked to mold a fetal head from a potato, make a cardboard cervix showing dilatation measurements during vaginal delivery, and make a fetal position identification model taking the occiput as a reference point.
Control Group
Control group received the course explaining vaginal delivery for the first time
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simulation-based training
The simulation training included the activities that midwives should do during the birth and management of vaginal delivery with episiotomy. The students received theoretical training, and to reinforce it, they were asked to mold a fetal head from a potato, make a cardboard cervix showing dilatation measurements during vaginal delivery, and make a fetal position identification model taking the occiput as a reference point.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Older than 18 years,
* To Voluntary to participate,
* To know how to read, write and speak in Turkish,
* To do model work
* Fully completed the data collection forms
* To continue the all course
Exclusion Criteria
* Younger than 18 years,
* Refuse to participate
* Not knowing how to read, write and speak Turkish,
* Not to do model work
* Not to fill the questionnaire
* Not to continue the course
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aysegul Durmaz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aysegul Durmaz
Asst. Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aysegul Durmaz
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KSBU
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kutahya Health Science University
Kütahya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Kutahya Health Science University
Kütahya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dearnley CA, Meddings FS. Student self-assessment and its impact on learning - a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2007 May;27(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
Valen K, Holm AL, Jensen KT, Grov EK. Nursing students' perception on transferring experiences in palliative care simulation to practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jun;77:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
Lendahls L, Oscarsson MG. Midwifery students' experiences of simulation- and skills training. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
Doody O, Condon M. Using a simulated environment to support students learning clinical skills. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Nov;13(6):561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
Posmontier B, Montgomery K, Smith Glasgow ME, Montgomery OC, Morse K. Transdisciplinary teamwork simulation in obstetrics-gynecology health care education. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Mar;51(3):176-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120127-02. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
Miles DA. Simulation Learning and Transfer in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Grounded Theory Study. J Nurs Educ. 2018 Jun 1;57(6):347-353. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180522-05.
Cantrell ML, Meyer SL, Mosack V. Effects of Simulation on Nursing Student Stress: An Integrative Review. J Nurs Educ. 2017 Mar 1;56(3):139-144. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170222-04.
Landeen J, Pierazzo J, Akhtar-Danesh N, Baxter P, van Eijk S, Evers C. Exploring Student and Faculty Perceptions of Clinical Simulation: A Q-Sort Study. J Nurs Educ. 2015 Sep;54(9):485-91. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150814-02.
Guler H, Cetin P, Yurtsal ZB, Cesur B, Bekar M, Ucar T, Evcili F, Cetin A. Effect of episiotomy training with beef tongue and sponge simulators on the self-confidence building of midwifery students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 May;30:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sim. Malp. Percep.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id