Nursing Students & Positive Birth Perception & Simulation

NCT ID: NCT06241443

Last Updated: 2024-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-20

Study Completion Date

2023-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aimed to investigate the impact of simulation-based training on nursing students' perception of positive birth and natural birthing approaches.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aimed to determine whether simulation-based training could improve the perception of positive birth and natural birthing approaches among fourth-year nursing students. The study used a randomized controlled quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test. The intervention group received hybrid simulation, while the other received video-modeling training. The study used several tools to assess the impact of the training, including the Demographic Information Form, Natural Birth Approach Questionnaire, Student Satisfaction and Confidence in Learning Scale, Satisfaction with Education Methods Questionnaire, and Natural Birth Approach Clinical Skills Guide.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Childbirth Problems

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled quasi-experiment
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The students who participated in the research were unaware of their assigned group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hybrid simulation

These students participated in a natural birth approach scenario with a hybrid simulation (n=28).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hybrid simulation

Intervention Type OTHER

During the hybrid simulation, a student and a standardized patient participated. The patient wore a wearable pregnancy model. Before the start of the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario, a pre-briefing session was conducted. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded on video, and each simulation lasted approximately 30 minutes. After the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was given. Scales were used to evaluate the implementation of the practices.

video-modeling group

The students in this group participated in a video modeling education (n=28).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

video-modeling

Intervention Type OTHER

The students in the group had the opportunity to learn through an educational video that followed the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario." Afterward, they put their knowledge into practice and were evaluated using the Birth Approach Clinical Skills Guide. A feedback session followed the practice session. Finally, they were assessed using scales to measure their performance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hybrid simulation

During the hybrid simulation, a student and a standardized patient participated. The patient wore a wearable pregnancy model. Before the start of the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario, a pre-briefing session was conducted. The student's performance during the simulation was recorded on video, and each simulation lasted approximately 30 minutes. After the simulation, a debriefing session was held with the student, and feedback was given. Scales were used to evaluate the implementation of the practices.

Intervention Type OTHER

video-modeling

The students in the group had the opportunity to learn through an educational video that followed the "Natural Birth Approach Scenario." Afterward, they put their knowledge into practice and were evaluated using the Birth Approach Clinical Skills Guide. A feedback session followed the practice session. Finally, they were assessed using scales to measure their performance.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The voluntarily agree to participate in the study Not having experience with simulation Being a 4th year nursing undergraduate student not working as a nurse

Exclusion Criteria

* During the study, participants must complete all forms, attend all theoretical training, and remain in the study until completion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ege University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

sümeyye bakır

doctoral student/research assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

sümeyye bakır, master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ege University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ege Univesity

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dunbar-Reid K, Sinclair PM, Hudson D. Advancing renal education: hybrid simulation, using simulated patients to enhance realism in haemodialysis education. J Ren Care. 2015 Jun;41(2):134-9. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12112. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25631292 (View on PubMed)

Bakke E, Oseth EH, Fofanah T, Sesay I, van Duinen A, Bolkan HA, Westendorp J, Lonnee-Hoffmann R. Vacuum births and barriers to its use: An observational study in governmental hospitals in Sierra Leone. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e060773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060773.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36414288 (View on PubMed)

Duff J, Kardong-Edgren S, Chang TP, Elkin RL, Ramachandra G, Stapleton S, Palaganas JC, Kou M, Gross IT. Closing the gap: a call for a common blueprint for remote distance telesimulation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Apr 12;7(4):185-187. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000875. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35516822 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E.1161

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Simulator Use in Newborn First Care
NCT06406738 COMPLETED NA
Scenario-Based Simulation
NCT06870227 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Normal Birth Management and Use of Simulation
NCT05999409 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA