Assessment of Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Septic Shock Patients by OCTA
NCT ID: NCT04593212
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
165 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-16
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary objective: To characterize the alterations of retinal and choroidal microcirculation in septic shock.
We will test the hypothesis that retinal and/or choroidal microcirculation shows dysfunctional changes (lower vascular density, lower percentage of perfused small vessel, lower blood flow index and higher vascular heterogeneity) in septic shock patients.
Secondary objective: To test the prognostic value of retinal and choroidal microcirculatory dysfunction in septic shock.
We will test the hypothesis that higher magnitude and persistence of retinal and/or choroidal microcirculatory dysfunction beyond the successful macro-hemodynamic resuscitation are independent predictors of organ failure and mortality in septic shock patients.
Study type: Two sequential observational studies.
Study design: A cross-sectional case-control study followed by a prospective cohort study with a 90-days longitudinal follow-up period.
Study population: 165 septic shock patients and 30 healthy controls.
Study duration: 90 days from enrolment to final follow-up assessment. One to two years of enrolment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Microcirculatory Oxygen Uptake in Sepsis
NCT02430142
Diagnostic Accuracy in Sepsis
NCT03956043
Strain Echocardiography During Septic Shock : an Observational Pilot Study
NCT03663192
Evaluation of Impaired Microcirculation During Septic Shock With Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
NCT02277977
Macro and Micro Haemodynamic Responses to Shock in the Renal and Systemic - MICROSHOCK - RENAL
NCT03713307
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objective (specific aim 1): To characterize the alterations of retinal and choroidal microcirculation in septic shock.
We will test the hypothesis that retinal and/or choroidal microcirculation shows dysfunctional changes (lower vascular density, lower percentage of perfused small vessel, lower blood flow index and higher vascular heterogeneity) in septic shock patients.
Secondary objective (specific aim 2): To test the prognostic value of retinal and choroidal microcirculatory dysfunction in septic shock.
We will test the hypothesis that higher magnitude and persistence of retinal and/or choroidal microcirculatory dysfunction beyond the successful macro-hemodynamic resuscitation are independent predictors of organ failure and mortality in septic shock patients.
Study type: Two sequential observational studies.
Study design: A cross-sectional case-control study followed by a prospective cohort study with a 90-days longitudinal follow-up period.
Study population: 165 septic shock patients and 30 healthy controls. Power and sample size calculations: Based on sublingual percentage of perfused small vessel (PPV) difference previously reported between septic shock patients and healthy controls (60% vs. 95%), we estimate that we will need to enrol 27 patients and 27 controls to demonstrate the same difference at the retina and choroid. To show a PPV difference between survivors and non-survivors (70% vs. 46%) in the septic shock group, also based on previous reports at the sublingual microcirculatory level, we estimate that we will need to enrol 150 septic shock patients. These calculations assumed an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Our Department admits about 200 septic shock patients annually, so to account for drop-outs and limitations with enrolment (10-20% refusal to participate) we decided to increase our enrolment goal by 10% to 165 septic shock patients and 30 healthy controls.
Recruitment and inform consent: Recruitment will take place at the Intensive Care Medicine Department of Hospital da Luz Lisboa. Patients admitted to the Department with the diagnosis of septic shock will be screened for eligibility. If the patients are eligible to participate, they will be invited to enrol in the study by the principal investigator or other ICU medical team member. The study objectives and procedures will be explained to them. If the patient agrees to participate in the study, a written informed consent will be sign before enrolment. If the patient is unable to give informed consent to participate in the study, it will be asked to the reference next of kin using the same procedures as described before.
Study duration: 90 days from enrolment to final follow-up assessment. One to two years of enrolment.
Study procedures:
Baseline Assessment: After confirmation of eligibility and enrolment in the studies, demographic data (age, gender), type of admission (urgent/elective, medical/surgical/trauma), patient origin (emergency department, ward, operation room), source of infection (lung, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, skin and soft tissues, others), prognostic scores (APACHE II, SAPS II) and organic dysfunction scores (SOFA, quick SOFA) will be collected at baseline for septic shock patients.
Study Assessments:
OCTA: OCTA examination will be performed daily to septic shock patients from day 1 (less than 24 hours after diagnosis) until successful shock resolution (weaning from vasopressors) or until a maximum of 7 days. The healthy controls will be submitted to a single OCTA evaluation. We will use the Cirrus 6000® OCTA system (ZEISS, Germany) and the interpretation of OCTA images will be performed by two independent specialized ophthalmologists blinded to the clinical condition of patients. Images will be stored at the device working station.
Hemodynamic assessment: Every septic shock patient will have a central venous catheter and an arterial line in place according to the standard of care. Daily, during or within a maximum of 1 hour of OCTA examination, we will record the values of temperature, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, capillary refill time, central venous pressure, cardiac index, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, PvCO2, SaO2, SvO2, haemoglobin, serum lactate, fluid balance, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption and oxygen extraction ratio.
Vasoactive and sedo-analgesic drugs: Daily we will record the vasoactive and sedo-analgesic drugs administered to septic shock patients and its total daily dose until complete weaning (defined as 24 hours free of vasopressors). Daily vasopressor score will also be calculated as suggested by Póvoa, P. et al.
Ventilatory and renal replacement therapy support: Daily we will record the type of ventilatory support (oxygen therapy, high flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation) and of renal replacement therapy (continuous, sustained low-efficiency, intermittent) used, if needed, until complete weaning.
Data analysis: In both studies, we will perform a descriptive statistical analysis of studied variables. Comparisons between healthy controls (single OCTA) and septic shock patients (first OCTA) to address endpoints related to specific aim 1 will be performed using t-Student test or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. To address endpoints related to specific aim 2, we will compare survivors to non-survivors by doing a survival analysis using Kaplan-Meyer curves and Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression with microcirculatory measures as predictors. Additional comparisons will be performed using χ2 test, t-Student test, Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression as appropriate. We will assess confounding by adding significant variables in the regression models. We intend to perform a prespecified subgroup analysis of septic shock patients by serum lactate \<4mmol/L vs. ≥4mmol/L and \<2mmol/L vs. ≥2mmol/L. The correlation between retinal and choroidal microcirculation variables and macrohemodynamic variables will be assessed by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of OCTA for prognostic outcomes will be calculated. A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis will be performed with STATA® 15 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Septic Shock Survivors
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Evaluation of microcirculatory dysfunction by assessment of retinal and choroidal microvasculature with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
Septic Shock Non-Survivors
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Evaluation of microcirculatory dysfunction by assessment of retinal and choroidal microvasculature with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Evaluation of microcirculatory dysfunction by assessment of retinal and choroidal microvasculature with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* septic shock diagnosis (defined by the presence of sepsis according to Sepsis-3 definition plus a SOFA score ≥ 3 points at cardiovascular system despite adequate volume resuscitation) less than 24 hours before the first OCTA assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Shock due to any other cause without septic shock
* Bilateral eye absence
* Previously known retinopathy
* Previous retinal surgery or photocoagulation
* Pregnant women
* Participants with psychiatry disorders
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital da Luz, Portugal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
André Alexandre, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
11170
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital da Luz Lisboa
Lisbon, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Backer D, Cecconi M, Lipman J, Machado F, Myatra SN, Ostermann M, Perner A, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Walley KR. Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):420-433. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05544-x. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Lipinska-Gediga M. Sepsis and septic shock-is a microcirculation a main player? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(4):261-265. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0037. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Ince C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care. 2015;19 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S8. doi: 10.1186/cc14726. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Ait-Oufella H, Bourcier S, Lehoux S, Guidet B. Microcirculatory disorders during septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Aug;21(4):271-5. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000217.
Ince C. The rationale for microcirculatory guided fluid therapy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):301-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000091.
De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Scolletta S, Vincent JL. Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome. Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):791-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742e8b.
Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 May;64:1-55. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Onishi AC, Fawzi AA. An overview of optical coherence tomography angiography and the posterior pole. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 3;11:2515841419840249. doi: 10.1177/2515841419840249. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Sambhav K, Grover S, Chalam KV. The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov-Dec;62(6):838-866. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Alnawaiseh M, Ertmer C, Seidel L, Arnemann PH, Lahme L, Kampmeier TG, Rehberg SW, Heiduschka P, Eter N, Hessler M. Feasibility of optical coherence tomography angiography to assess changes in retinal microcirculation in ovine haemorrhagic shock. Crit Care. 2018 May 29;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2056-3.
Erikson K, Liisanantti JH, Hautala N, Koskenkari J, Kamakura R, Herzig KH, Syrjala H, Ala-Kokko TI. Retinal arterial blood flow and retinal changes in patients with sepsis: preliminary study using fluorescein angiography. Crit Care. 2017 Apr 10;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1676-3.
De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):98-104. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200109-016oc.
Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1825-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000138558.16257.3f.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Povoa P, Salluh JI, Martinez ML, Guillamat-Prats R, Gallup D, Al-Khalidi HR, Thompson BT, Ranieri VM, Artigas A. Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 28;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0921-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
id.215
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.